Literature DB >> 23590513

Is computed tomography mandatory for the detection of residual stone fragments after percutaneous nephrolithotomy?

Petros Sountoulides1, Linda Metaxa, Luca Cindolo.   

Abstract

The introduction of minimally invasive endourologic procedures for upper urinary stone disintegration has closed the curtain on the era of open surgery for upper urinary tract stones in which complete stone eradication was the rule. This shift to minimally invasive procedures has led to the introduction of new terminology, such as stone-free rates and residual stone fragments, the presence of which after treatment was considered an acceptable therapeutic end point. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is currently considered the procedure of choice for large renal stones. Its use has been greatly facilitated by the favorable profile of multidetector CT with regard to its sensitivity in detecting small stones. Despite the fact that CT is considered essential for the diagnosis and exact localization of stones and has been used for the creation of percutaneous tracts in PCNL, however, its routine use for the post-PCNL detection of residual stones has not been established. There is evidence that routine application of post-PCNL CT provides additional advantages compared with other imaging modalities-namely, the identification of the presence and location of even small residual fragments, which has been shown to cause significant trouble and necessitate secondary procedures in a significant cohort of patients after PCNL. On the other hand, the issues of cost, availability of CT scanners, and radiation exposure along with the acceptable sensitivity, cost, and availability of other imaging studies has raised doubts as to whether CT should be the routine imaging study after PCNL. The present review will discuss the concept of clinically significant residual fragments and comment on the advantages and drawbacks of different imaging studies used for the detection of residual stones after PCNL. This review also aims to clarify the indications in which CT should routinely be performed or could be omitted in the follow-up after PCNL.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23590513     DOI: 10.1089/end.2012.0253

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endourol        ISSN: 0892-7790            Impact factor:   2.942


  11 in total

1.  What is the fate of insignificant residual fragment following percutaneous nephrolithotomy in pediatric patients with anomalous kidney? A comparison with normal kidney.

Authors:  Bimalesh Purkait; Rahul Janak Sinha; Ankur Bansal; Ashok Kumar Sokhal; Kawaljit Singh; Vishwajeet Singh
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2017-05-06       Impact factor: 3.436

2.  Residual stones after percutaneous nephrolithotomy: comparison of intraoperative assessment and postoperative non-contrast computerized tomography.

Authors:  Ahmed M Harraz; Yasser Osman; Ahmed R El-Nahas; Amr A Elsawy; Islam Fakhreldin; Osama Mahmoud; Ahmed El-Assmy; Ahmed A Shokeir
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2016-12-24       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  Should mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy (MiniPNL/Miniperc) be the ideal tract for medium-sized renal calculi (15-30 mm)?

Authors:  Rajesh A Kukreja
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2017-11-13       Impact factor: 4.226

4.  Sheathless and fluoroscopy-free retrograde intrarenal surgery: An attractive way of renal stone management in high-volume stone centers.

Authors:  Sarwar Noori Mahmood; Hewa Toffeq; Saman Fakhralddin
Journal:  Asian J Urol       Date:  2019-07-16

5.  Methylene Blue Injection as an Alternative to Antegrade Nephrostography to Assess Urinary Obstruction After Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy.

Authors:  Matthew D Truesdale; Molly Elmer-Dewitt; Marco Sandri; Bogdana Schmidt; Ian Metzler; Adam Gadzinski; Marshall L Stoller; Thomas Chi
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 2.942

6.  Low-Dose (10%) Computed Tomography May Be Inferior to Standard-Dose CT in the Evaluation of Acute Renal Colic in the Emergency Room Setting.

Authors:  Ibraheem M Malkawi; Esther Han; Christopher S Atalla; Richard A Santucci; Brian O'Neil; Jason B Wynberg
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2016-02-03       Impact factor: 2.942

7.  Comparison of imaging modalities for detection of residual fragments and prediction of stone related events following percutaneous nephrolitotomy.

Authors:  Mehmet Ilker Gokce; Eriz Ozden; Evren Suer; Basak Gulpinar; Omer Gulpınar; Semih Tangal
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2015 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.541

8.  Differences in the percutaneous nephrolithotomy practice patterns among Latin American urologists with and without endourology training.

Authors:  Braulio O Manzo; Edgar Lozada; Fabio C Vicentini; Francisco Javier Sanchez; Gildardo Manzo
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2018 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.541

9.  Rearrangement of the Guy's stone score improves prediction of stone-free rate after percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Authors:  Jorge Moreno-Palacios; Oswaldo José Avilés-Ibarra; Enrique García-Peña; Juan Ramón Torres-Anguiano; Eduardo Alonso Serrano-Brambilia; Virgilio Augusto López-Sámano; Efraín Maldonado-Alcaraz
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2018-01-08

10.  A prospective multicenter European study on flexible ureterorenoscopy for the management of renal stone.

Authors:  Francesco Berardinelli; Silvia Proietti; Luca Cindolo; Fabrizio Pellegrini; Roberto Peschechera; Hennessey Derek; Orietta Dalpiaz; Luigi Schips; Guido Giusti
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2016 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.541

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.