OBJECTIVES: To examine whether white matter hyperintensities (WMHs) on brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in tracts in older adults with mobility impairment are linked to outcomes of gait rehabilitation interventions. DESIGN: Twelve-week randomized controlled single-blind trial. SETTING: University-based mobility research laboratory. PARTICIPANTS: Ambulatory adults aged 65 and older with mobility impairment. INTERVENTION: A conventional gait intervention focusing on walking, endurance, balance, and strength (WEBS, n = 21) and a task-oriented intervention focused on timing and coordination of gait (TC, n = 23). MEASUREMENTS: Self-paced gait speed was measured over an instrumented walkway before and after the intervention, and WMH and brain volumes were quantified on preintervention brain MRI using an automated segmentation process. A white matter tract atlas was overlaid on the segmented images to measure tract WMH volumes, and WMH volumes were normalized to total brain volume. Aggregate WMH volumes in all white matter tracts and individual WMH volumes in specific longitudinal tracts (superior longitudinal fasciculus, inferior longitudinal fasciculus, and fronto-occipital fasciculus) and the cingulum were measured. RESULTS:Gait speed gains in the TC group were of the same magnitude, independent of WMH volume measures in all except the cingulum, but in the WEBS group, gain in gait speed was smaller with greater overall tract WMH volumes (P < .001) and with greater WMH volume in the three longitudinal tracts (P < .001 to .02). CONCLUSION: Gains in gait speed with two types of gait rehabilitation are associated with individual differences in WMHs. Task-oriented therapy that targets timing and coordination of gait may particularly benefit older adults with WMHs in brain tracts that influence gait and cognition.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVES: To examine whether white matter hyperintensities (WMHs) on brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in tracts in older adults with mobility impairment are linked to outcomes of gait rehabilitation interventions. DESIGN: Twelve-week randomized controlled single-blind trial. SETTING: University-based mobility research laboratory. PARTICIPANTS: Ambulatory adults aged 65 and older with mobility impairment. INTERVENTION: A conventional gait intervention focusing on walking, endurance, balance, and strength (WEBS, n = 21) and a task-oriented intervention focused on timing and coordination of gait (TC, n = 23). MEASUREMENTS: Self-paced gait speed was measured over an instrumented walkway before and after the intervention, and WMH and brain volumes were quantified on preintervention brain MRI using an automated segmentation process. A white matter tract atlas was overlaid on the segmented images to measure tract WMH volumes, and WMH volumes were normalized to total brain volume. Aggregate WMH volumes in all white matter tracts and individual WMH volumes in specific longitudinal tracts (superior longitudinal fasciculus, inferior longitudinal fasciculus, and fronto-occipital fasciculus) and the cingulum were measured. RESULTS: Gait speed gains in the TC group were of the same magnitude, independent of WMH volume measures in all except the cingulum, but in the WEBS group, gain in gait speed was smaller with greater overall tract WMH volumes (P < .001) and with greater WMH volume in the three longitudinal tracts (P < .001 to .02). CONCLUSION: Gains in gait speed with two types of gait rehabilitation are associated with individual differences in WMHs. Task-oriented therapy that targets timing and coordination of gait may particularly benefit older adults with WMHs in brain tracts that influence gait and cognition.
Authors: Joe Verghese; Jeannette Mahoney; Anne F Ambrose; Cuiling Wang; Roee Holtzer Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2010-07-19 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Stephanie Studenski; Subashan Perera; Kushang Patel; Caterina Rosano; Kimberly Faulkner; Marco Inzitari; Jennifer Brach; Julie Chandler; Peggy Cawthon; Elizabeth Barrett Connor; Michael Nevitt; Marjolein Visser; Stephen Kritchevsky; Stefania Badinelli; Tamara Harris; Anne B Newman; Jane Cauley; Luigi Ferrucci; Jack Guralnik Journal: JAMA Date: 2011-01-05 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Velandai Srikanth; Thanh G Phan; Jian Chen; Richard Beare; Jennifer M Stapleton; David C Reutens Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 2010-02 Impact factor: 10.422
Authors: Karlijn F de Laat; Anil M Tuladhar; Anouk G W van Norden; David G Norris; Marcel P Zwiers; Frank-Erik de Leeuw Journal: Brain Date: 2010-12-14 Impact factor: 13.501
Authors: Teresa Liu-Ambrose; Jennifer C Davis; Lindsay S Nagamatsu; Chun Liang Hsu; Lindsay A Katarynych; Karim M Khan Journal: BMC Geriatr Date: 2010-05-19 Impact factor: 3.921
Authors: Vijay K Venkatraman; Howard Aizenstein; Jack Guralnik; Anne B Newman; Nancy W Glynn; Christopher Taylor; Stephanie Studenski; Lenore Launer; Marco Pahor; Jeff Williamson; Caterina Rosano Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2009-11-14 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Jessie M VanSwearingen; Subashan Perera; Jennifer S Brach; Rakie Cham; Caterina Rosano; Stephanie A Studenski Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2009-07-30 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Andu Turken; Susan Whitfield-Gabrieli; Roland Bammer; Juliana V Baldo; Nina F Dronkers; John D E Gabrieli Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2008-04-11 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Stephen D Anton; Adam J Woods; Tetso Ashizawa; Diana Barb; Thomas W Buford; Christy S Carter; David J Clark; Ronald A Cohen; Duane B Corbett; Yenisel Cruz-Almeida; Vonetta Dotson; Natalie Ebner; Philip A Efron; Roger B Fillingim; Thomas C Foster; David M Gundermann; Anna-Maria Joseph; Christy Karabetian; Christiaan Leeuwenburgh; Todd M Manini; Michael Marsiske; Robert T Mankowski; Heather L Mutchie; Michael G Perri; Sanjay Ranka; Parisa Rashidi; Bhanuprasad Sandesara; Philip J Scarpace; Kimberly T Sibille; Laurence M Solberg; Shinichi Someya; Connie Uphold; Stephanie Wohlgemuth; Samuel Shangwu Wu; Marco Pahor Journal: Ageing Res Rev Date: 2015-10-14 Impact factor: 10.895
Authors: Neelesh K Nadkarni; Karen A Nunley; Howard Aizenstein; Tamara B Harris; Kristine Yaffe; Suzanne Satterfield; Anne B Newman; Caterina Rosano Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2013-10-29 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Andrea L Rosso; Stephanie A Studenski; W T Longstreth; Jennifer S Brach; Robert M Boudreau; Caterina Rosano Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2017-09-01 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Barbara Landsmann; Daniela Pinter; Eva Pirker; Gerald Pichler; Walter Schippinger; Elisabeth M Weiss; Gabriel Mathie; Thomas Gattringer; Franz Fazekas; Christian Enzinger Journal: Clin Interv Aging Date: 2016-01-28 Impact factor: 4.458