Literature DB >> 23590221

Perceptions of genetic counseling services in direct-to-consumer personal genomic testing.

B F Darst1, L Madlensky, N J Schork, E J Topol, C S Bloss.   

Abstract

To describe consumers' perceptions of genetic counseling services in the context of direct-to-consumer personal genomic testing is the purpose of this research. Utilizing data from the Scripps Genomic Health Initiative, we assessed direct-to-consumer genomic test consumers' utilization and perceptions of genetic counseling services. At long-term follow-up, approximately 14 months post-testing, participants were asked to respond to several items gauging their interactions, if any, with a Navigenics genetic counselor, and their perceptions of those interactions. Out of 1325 individuals who completed long-term follow-up, 187 (14.1%) indicated that they had spoken with a genetic counselor. The most commonly given reason for not utilizing the counseling service was a lack of need due to the perception of already understanding one's results (55.6%). The most common reasons for utilizing the service included wanting to take advantage of a free service (43.9%) and wanting more information on risk calculations (42.2%). Among those who utilized the service, a large fraction reported that counseling improved their understanding of their results (54.5%) and genetics in general (43.9%). A relatively small proportion of participants utilized genetic counseling after direct-to-consumer personal genomic testing. Among those individuals who did utilize the service, however, a large fraction perceived it to be informative, and thus presumably beneficial.
© 2013 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  direct-to-consumer; disclosure of genetic results; genetic counseling; genomic education; genomics; outcomes; personal genomic testing; personalized medicine; utilization

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23590221     DOI: 10.1111/cge.12166

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Genet        ISSN: 0009-9163            Impact factor:   4.438


  14 in total

1.  Case Report: Direct Access Genetic Testing and A False-Positive Result For Long QT Syndrome.

Authors:  Sarah Predham; Sara Hamilton; Alison M Elliott; William T Gibson
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2015-08-30       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  Genomic counseling: next generation counseling.

Authors:  Rachel Mills; Susanne B Haga
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2013-09-12       Impact factor: 2.537

3.  EMR documentation of physician-patient communication following genomic counseling for actionable complex disease and pharmacogenomic results.

Authors:  K Sweet; A C Sturm; T Schmidlen; S Hovick; J Peng; K Manickam; A Salikhova; J McElroy; L Scheinfeldt; A E Toland; J S Roberts; M Christman
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  2016-07-28       Impact factor: 4.438

4.  Direct to consumer genetic testing-law and policy concerns in Ireland.

Authors:  Aisling de Paor
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2017-11-25       Impact factor: 1.568

5.  Personalized genomic results: analysis of informational needs.

Authors:  Tara J Schmidlen; Lisa Wawak; Rachel Kasper; J Felipe García-España; Michael F Christman; Erynn S Gordon
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2014-02-03       Impact factor: 2.537

6.  Utilization of Genetic Counseling after Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing: Findings from the Impact of Personal Genomics (PGen) Study.

Authors:  Diane R Koeller; Wendy R Uhlmann; Deanna Alexis Carere; Robert C Green; J Scott Roberts
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2017-05-16       Impact factor: 2.537

7.  Impact of delivery models on understanding genomic risk for type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  S B Haga; W T Barry; R Mills; L Svetkey; S Suchindran; H F Willard; G S Ginsburg
Journal:  Public Health Genomics       Date:  2014-02-27       Impact factor: 2.000

8.  Should I Perform Genetic Testing? A Qualitative Look into the Decision Making Considerations of Religious Israeli Undergraduate Students.

Authors:  Merav Siani; Orit Ben-Zvi Assaraf
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2016-03-15       Impact factor: 2.537

9.  Direct to consumer testing in reproductive contexts--should health professionals be concerned?

Authors:  Heather Skirton
Journal:  Life Sci Soc Policy       Date:  2015-04-29

10.  Genetic tests obtainable through pharmacies: the good, the bad, and the ugly.

Authors:  George P Patrinos; Darrol J Baker; Fahd Al-Mulla; Vasilis Vasiliou; David N Cooper
Journal:  Hum Genomics       Date:  2013-07-08       Impact factor: 4.639

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.