Literature DB >> 23589232

MR elastography for noninvasive assessment of hepatic fibrosis: reproducibility of the examination and reproducibility and repeatability of the liver stiffness value measurement.

Ye ji Lee1, Jeong Min Lee, Jeong Eun Lee, Kyung Bun Lee, Eun Sun Lee, Jeong-Hee Yoon, Mi Hye Yu, Jee Hyun Baek, Cheong Il Shin, Joon Koo Han, Byung Ihn Choi.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the reproducibility of MR elastography (MRE) and the reproducibility and repeatability of the stiffness measurement of MRE in the staging of liver fibrosis.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ninety-four patients, who underwent liver MRE, were included in this study. The patients were classified into group 1 (n = 47) and group 2 (n = 47) according to our knowledge of their histologic hepatic fibrosis (HF) stage. To analyze the reproducibility of MRE, the group 1 patients underwent MRE twice. In addition, to evaluate the repeatability and reproducibility of the stiffness measurement of MRE, a single observer measured the stiffness values of the second MREs in group 1 twice, and two observers independently measured the stiffness values of MRE in group 2. A 95% Bland-Altman limits of agreement and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were used to evaluate the reproducibility and repeatability of MRE.
RESULTS: In group I, there was no significant difference in the mean liver stiffness values of the first and second MRE examinations, i.e., 3.45 ± 0.25 kPa vs. 3.35 ± 0.23 kPa (p = 0.22). The reproducibility of the MRE examination and the reproducibility and repeatability of the stiffness measurement were high, i.e., the ICCs of each parameter were 0.945, 0.827, and 0.963, respectively, and the 95% limits of agreement were 25.3%, 35.35%, and 18.0%, respectively.
CONCLUSION: MRE is a promising tool for evaluating HF and has high reproducibility of the examination as well as reproducibility and repeatability of the stiffness measurements.
Copyright © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  liver fibrosis; magnetic resonance elastography; reproducibility of results

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23589232     DOI: 10.1002/jmri.24147

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 1053-1807            Impact factor:   4.813


  43 in total

1.  Repeatability and reproducibility of 2D and 3D hepatic MR elastography with rigid and flexible drivers at end-expiration and end-inspiration in healthy volunteers.

Authors:  Kang Wang; Paul Manning; Nikolaus Szeverenyi; Tanya Wolfson; Gavin Hamilton; Michael S Middleton; Florin Vaida; Meng Yin; Kevin Glaser; Richard L Ehman; Claude B Sirlin
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2017-12

2.  Repeatability of MR Elastography of Liver: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Suraj D Serai; Nancy A Obuchowski; Sudhakar K Venkatesh; Claude B Sirlin; Frank H Miller; Edward Ashton; Patricia E Cole; Richard L Ehman
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2017-05-22       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 3.  Magnetic resonance elastography: basic principles, technique, and clinical applications in the liver.

Authors:  Habip Eser Akkaya; Ayşe Erden; Diğdem Kuru Öz; Sena Ünal; İlhan Erden
Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 2.630

4.  Prediction of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) activity score (NAS) with multiparametric hepatic magnetic resonance imaging and elastography.

Authors:  Ziying Yin; Matthew C Murphy; Jiahui Li; Kevin J Glaser; Amy S Mauer; Taofic Mounajjed; Terry M Therneau; Heshan Liu; Harmeet Malhi; Armando Manduca; Richard L Ehman; Meng Yin
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-03-18       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 5.  KASL clinical practice guidelines: management of hepatitis C.

Authors: 
Journal:  Clin Mol Hepatol       Date:  2016-03-28

Review 6.  MR elastography of liver: current status and future perspectives.

Authors:  Ilkay S Idilman; Jiahui Li; Meng Yin; Sudhakar K Venkatesh
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2020-07-23

7.  Magnetic Resonance Elastography of the Liver: Qualitative and Quantitative Comparison of Gradient Echo and Spin Echo Echoplanar Imaging Sequences.

Authors:  Mathilde Wagner; Cecilia Besa; Jad Bou Ayache; Temel Kaya Yasar; Octavia Bane; Maggie Fung; Richard L Ehman; Bachir Taouli
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 6.016

Review 8.  Quantitative Elastography Methods in Liver Disease: Current Evidence and Future Directions.

Authors:  Paul Kennedy; Mathilde Wagner; Laurent Castéra; Cheng William Hong; Curtis L Johnson; Claude B Sirlin; Bachir Taouli
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 9.  Magnetic resonance elastography of abdomen.

Authors:  Sudhakar Kundapur Venkatesh; Richard L Ehman
Journal:  Abdom Imaging       Date:  2015-04

Review 10.  Magnetic Resonance Elastography of Liver: Current Update.

Authors:  Safa Hoodeshenas; Meng Yin; Sudhakar Kundapur Venkatesh
Journal:  Top Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2018-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.