Literature DB >> 23589199

Numerical-spatial representation affects spatial coding: binding errors across the numerical distance effect.

Isabel Arend1, Sharon Naparstek, Avishai Henik.   

Abstract

Does numerical-spatial representation affect feature binding? Studies of visual attention show that poor spatial coding leads to illusory conjunctions (ICs). In numerical cognition, it has been shown that numbers and space are not totally dissociated. This association underlies the numerical distance effect (DE): faster responses as the distance between the compared digits becomes larger (2 7 vs. 2 4). We used the DE to test whether numerical-spatial representation is available to visual processes that rely on spatial coding, such as feature binding. Participants reported the larger of two colored numbers. Both numerical distance (distances 2 and 5) and number-space congruity (e.g., congruent pair, 1 3; incongruent pair, 3 1) were analyzed. Results showed a higher proportion of ICs for distance 2 than for distance 5, providing strong evidence that numerical-spatial representation (1) entails a strong location code and (2) is available to visual processes that rely on location information.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23589199     DOI: 10.3758/s13423-013-0428-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  28 in total

1.  Fractionating the binding process: neuropsychological evidence distinguishing binding of form from binding of surface features.

Authors:  G W Humphreys; C Cinel; J Wolfe; A Olson; N Klempen
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Number processing induces spatial performance biases.

Authors:  M H Fischer
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2001-09-11       Impact factor: 9.910

3.  Digits affect actions: the SNARC effect and response selection.

Authors:  Marwan Daar; Jay Pratt
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2007-12-23       Impact factor: 4.027

4.  Feature binding, attention and object perception.

Authors:  A Treisman
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1998-08-29       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Is numerical comparison digital? Analogical and symbolic effects in two-digit number comparison.

Authors:  S Dehaene; E Dupoux; J Mehler
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  A formal theory of feature binding in object perception.

Authors:  F G Ashby; W Prinzmetal; R Ivry; W T Maddox
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 8.934

Review 7.  Multimodal representation of space in the posterior parietal cortex and its use in planning movements.

Authors:  R A Andersen; L H Snyder; D C Bradley; J Xing
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 12.449

8.  Illusory conjunctions inside and outside the focus of attention.

Authors:  A Cohen; R Ivry
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Time required for judgements of numerical inequality.

Authors:  R S Moyer; T K Landauer
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1967-09-30       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Development of elementary numerical abilities: a neuronal model.

Authors:  S Dehaene; J P Changeux
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 3.225

View more
  1 in total

1.  Color-shape associations affect feature binding.

Authors:  Na Chen; Katsumi Watanabe
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2021-02
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.