Literature DB >> 15682348

Postoperative evaluation of femoral tunnel position in ACL reconstruction: plain radiography versus computed tomography.

Christian Hoser1, Katja Tecklenburg, Karl Heinz Kuenzel, Christian Fink.   

Abstract

Inaccurate femoral tunnel placement has been identified as one of the most frequent errors in failed anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions. Most surgeons evaluate the femoral tunnel position on plain radiographs but in a lot of cases it is difficult to detect the femoral tunnel. The goal of this study was to compare plain digital radiographs and multiplanar computed tomography (CT) scans for the evaluation of femoral tunnel position. We examined 50 patients 24-60 months postoperatively, following an arthroscopically-assisted anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with central third bone-patellar tendon-bone graft. Endobutton fixation was used on the femoral side and titanium interference screws on the tibial side. Standard antero-posterior and lateral X-rays and a CT scan were obtained from each patient. Sagittal and frontal reconstructions of the CT scan were used for the evaluation. We measured the height of the center of the tunnel in the notch in the frontal plane, and the position of the tunnel along Blumensaat's line (BL) in the lateral plane. Measurements are reported as percentages of total notch height and of the length of BL. On plain X-rays the tunnel was invisible in 46 cases in the anterior-posterior plane and in eight cases on the lateral plane. The average position in the frontal plane was 89.8%, and in the lateral plane 38.6%. In the CT scans, measurements were able to be done in 48 patients. The frontal-plane position averaged 90.5% and the lateral-plane position 34.1%. Pearson's correlation coefficient for the values in the lateral plane for CT and X-rays was low at 0.22, with p>0.05. In our group of 50 patients we were able to detect the femoral tunnel on both plains of standard X-rays in only four patients, whereas it was possible to take accurate measurements in 48 patients on reconstructed CT scans. We advocate the use of CT technology for the evaluation of femoral position whenever precise measurements are needed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15682348     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-004-0548-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  20 in total

1.  Single-incision technique misses the anatomical femoral anterior cruciate ligament insertion: a cadaver study.

Authors:  M P Arnold; J Kooloos; A van Kampen
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Anterior cruciate ligament injury: evaluation of intraarticular reconstruction of acute tears without repair. Two to seven year followup of 155 athletes.

Authors:  K D Shelbourne; H J Whitaker; J R McCarroll; A C Rettig; L D Hirschman
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1990 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 6.202

3.  Tunnel placement in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: MRI analysis as an important factor in the radiological report.

Authors:  R J Tomczak; G Hehl; P J Mergo; E Merkle; A Rieber; H J Brambs
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  Radiographic evaluation of native anterior cruciate ligament attachments and graft placement for reconstruction. A cadaveric study.

Authors:  D M Lintner; S E Dewitt; J B Moseley
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1996 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 6.202

5.  Functional anatomy of the anterior cruciate ligament and a rationale for reconstruction.

Authors:  M Odensten; J Gillquist
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1985-02       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  Proceedings of the ESSKA Scientific Workshop on Reconstruction of the Anterior and Posterior Cruciate Ligaments.

Authors:  A A Amis; B Beynnon; L Blankevoort; P Chambat; P Christel; L Durselen; N Friederich; E Grood; P Hertel; R Jakob
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  [Choice of femoral reinsertion sites after rupture of the anterior cruciate ligament--a roentgenologic evaluation model].

Authors:  E Sim
Journal:  Aktuelle Traumatol       Date:  1993-11

8.  Bone-block iliotibial-band transfer for anterior cruciate insufficiency.

Authors:  J Insall; D M Joseph; P Aglietti; R D Campbell
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1981-04       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  MR imaging and metallic implants for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: assessment of ferromagnetism and artifact.

Authors:  F G Shellock; J H Mink; S Curtin; M J Friedman
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1992 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.813

10.  The relationship between tunnel placement and clinical results after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  E E Khalfayan; P F Sharkey; A H Alexander; J D Bruckner; E B Bynum
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1996 May-Jun       Impact factor: 6.202

View more
  32 in total

1.  A CT-based classification of prior ACL femoral tunnel location for planning revision ACL surgery.

Authors:  Robert A Magnussen; Pedro Debieux; Biju Benjamin; Sébastien Lustig; Guillaume Demey; Elvire Servien; Philippe Neyret
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-12-08       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Transtibial versus low anteromedial portal drilling for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a radiographic study of femoral tunnel position.

Authors:  Cecilia Pascual-Garrido; Britta L Swanson; Kyle E Swanson
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-04-04       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Radiographic description of femoral tunnel placement expressed as intercondylar clock time in double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Junya Yamazaki; Takeshi Muneta; Hideyuki Koga; Ichiro Sekiya; Young-Jin Ju; Toshiyuki Morito; Kazuyoshi Yagishita
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2010-08-24       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Does bone impaction technique reduce tunnel enlargement in ACL reconstruction?

Authors:  Alper Gokce; Tahsin Beyzadeoglu; Fatih Ozyer; Halil Bekler; Fahri Erdogan
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2008-01-11       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Avoiding pitfalls in anatomic ACL reconstruction.

Authors:  Alexis Chiang Colvin; Wei Shen; Volker Musahl; Freddie H Fu
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2009-04-28       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Clinical outcome of anatomic double-bundle ACL reconstruction and 3D CT model-based validation of femoral socket aperture position.

Authors:  Shuji Taketomi; Hiroshi Inui; Kensuke Nakamura; Jinso Hirota; Takaki Sanada; Hironari Masuda; Hideki Takeda; Sakae Tanaka; Takumi Nakagawa
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-10-02       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  A modified quadrant method for describing the femoral tunnel aperture positions in ACL reconstruction using two-view plain radiographs.

Authors:  Masafumi Horie; Takeshi Muneta; Junya Yamazaki; Tomomasa Nakamura; Hideyuki Koga; Toshifumi Watanabe; Ichiro Sekiya
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-11-28       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  Radiological evaluation for conflict of the femoral tunnel entrance area prior to anterior cruciate ligament revision surgery.

Authors:  Philippe M Tscholl; Roland M Biedert; Imre Gal
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-10-26       Impact factor: 3.075

9.  Femoral bone tunnel placement using the transtibial tunnel or the anteromedial portal in ACL reconstruction: a radiographic evaluation.

Authors:  Jens Dargel; Rüdiger Schmidt-Wiethoff; Sören Fischer; Konrad Mader; Jürgen Koebke; Thomas Schneider
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2008-10-09       Impact factor: 4.342

10.  Knee rotation influences the femoral tunnel angle measurement after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a 3-dimensional computed tomography model study.

Authors:  Jing Tang; Eric Thorhauer; Chelsea Marsh; Freddie H Fu; Scott Tashman
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-04-16       Impact factor: 4.342

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.