Literature DB >> 23588999

Five-year downstream outcomes following prostate-specific antigen screening in older men.

Louise C Walter1, Kathy Z Fung, Katharine A Kirby, Ying Shi, Roxanne Espaldon, Sarah O'Brien, Stephen J Freedland, Adam A Powell, Richard M Hoffman.   

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: Despite ongoing controversies surrounding prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening, many men 65 years or older undergo screening. However, few data exist that quantify the chain of events following screening in clinical practice to better inform decisions.
OBJECTIVE: To quantify 5-year downstream outcomes following a PSA screening result exceeding 4.0 ng/mL in older men. DESIGN AND
SETTING: Longitudinal cohort study in the national Veterans Affairs health care system. PARTICIPANTS: In total, 295,645 men 65 years or older who underwent PSA screening in the Veterans Affairs health care system in 2003 and were followed up for 5 years using national Veterans Affairs and Medicare data. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Among men whose index screening PSA level exceeded 4.0 ng/mL, we determined the number who underwent prostate biopsy, were diagnosed as having prostate cancer, were treated for prostate cancer, and were treated for prostate cancer and were alive at 5 years according to baseline characteristics. Biopsy and treatment complications were also assessed.
RESULTS: In total, 25,208 men (8.5%) had an index PSA level exceeding 4.0 ng/mL. During the 5-year follow-up period, 8313 men (33.0%) underwent at least 1 prostate biopsy, and 5220 men (62.8%) who underwent prostate biopsy were diagnosed as having prostate cancer, of whom 4284 (82.1%) were treated for prostate cancer. Performance of prostate biopsy decreased with advancing age and worsening comorbidity (P < .001), whereas the percentage treated for biopsy-detected cancer exceeded 75% even among men 85 years or older, those with a Charlson-Deyo Comorbidity Index of 3 or higher, and those having low-risk cancer. Among men with biopsy-detected cancer, the risk of death from non-prostate cancer causes increased with advancing age and worsening comorbidity (P < .001). In total, 468 men (5.6%) had complications within 7 days after prostate biopsy. Complications of prostate cancer treatment included new urinary incontinence in 584 men (13.6%) and new erectile dysfunction 588 men (13.7%). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Performance of prostate biopsy is uncommon in older men with abnormal screening PSA levels and decreases with advancing age and worsening comorbidity. However, once cancer is detected on biopsy, most men undergo immediate treatment regardless of advancing age, worsening comorbidity, or low-risk cancer. Understanding downstream outcomes in clinical practice should better inform individualized decisions among older men considering PSA screening.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23588999      PMCID: PMC3712749          DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.323

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Intern Med        ISSN: 2168-6106            Impact factor:   21.873


  44 in total

1.  Prostate cancer screening--the evidence, the recommendations, and the clinical implications.

Authors:  Roger Chou; Michael L LeFevre
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2011-12-28       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Ability of Medicare claims data and cancer registries to identify cancer cases and treatment.

Authors:  D K McClish; L Penberthy; M Whittemore; C Newschaffer; D Woolard; C E Desch; S Retchin
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1997-02-01       Impact factor: 4.897

3.  Population-based patterns and predictors of prostate-specific antigen screening among older men in the United States.

Authors:  Michael W Drazer; Dezheng Huo; Mara A Schonberg; Aria Razmaria; Scott E Eggener
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-03-28       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Long-term quality-of-life outcomes after radical prostatectomy or watchful waiting: the Scandinavian Prostate Cancer Group-4 randomised trial.

Authors:  Eva Johansson; Gunnar Steineck; Lars Holmberg; Jan-Erik Johansson; Tommy Nyberg; Mirja Ruutu; Anna Bill-Axelson
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2011-08-05       Impact factor: 41.316

5.  Prostate-cancer mortality at 11 years of follow-up.

Authors:  Fritz H Schröder; Jonas Hugosson; Monique J Roobol; Teuvo L J Tammela; Stefano Ciatto; Vera Nelen; Maciej Kwiatkowski; Marcos Lujan; Hans Lilja; Marco Zappa; Louis J Denis; Franz Recker; Alvaro Páez; Liisa Määttänen; Chris H Bangma; Gunnar Aus; Sigrid Carlsson; Arnauld Villers; Xavier Rebillard; Theodorus van der Kwast; Paula M Kujala; Bert G Blijenberg; Ulf-Hakan Stenman; Andreas Huber; Kimmo Taari; Matti Hakama; Sue M Moss; Harry J de Koning; Anssi Auvinen
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-03-15       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Veterans' access to and use of Medicare and Veterans Affairs health care.

Authors:  Denise M Hynes; Kristin Koelling; Kevin Stroupe; Noreen Arnold; Katherine Mallin; Min-Woong Sohn; Frances M Weaver; Larry Manheim; Linda Kok
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 2.983

7.  PSA screening among elderly men with limited life expectancies.

Authors:  Louise C Walter; Daniel Bertenthal; Karla Lindquist; Badrinath R Konety
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2006-11-15       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Time trends and local variation in primary treatment of localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Matthew R Cooperberg; Jeanette M Broering; Peter R Carroll
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-02-01       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Prostate-specific antigen levels in the United States: implications of various definitions for abnormal.

Authors:  H Gilbert Welch; Lisa M Schwartz; Steven Woloshin
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2005-08-03       Impact factor: 13.506

10.  The impact of PSA screening on prostate cancer mortality and overdiagnosis of prostate cancer in the United States.

Authors:  Bret T Howrey; Yong-Fang Kuo; Yu-Li Lin; James S Goodwin
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  2012-05-04       Impact factor: 6.053

View more
  11 in total

1.  Reducing PSA-Based Prostate Cancer Screening in Men Aged 75 Years and Older with the Use of Highly Specific Computerized Clinical Decision Support.

Authors:  Jeremy B Shelton; Lee Ochotorena; Carol Bennett; Paul Shekelle; Lorna Kwan; Ted Skolarus; Caroline Goldzweig
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2015-03-05       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Elevated hardness of peripheral gland on real-time elastography is an independent marker for high-risk prostate cancers.

Authors:  Qi Zhang; Jing Yao; Yehua Cai; Limin Zhang; Yishuo Wu; Jingyu Xiong; Jun Shi; Yuanyuan Wang; Yi Wang
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2017-08-23       Impact factor: 3.469

3.  6-gene promoter methylation assay is potentially applicable for prostate cancer clinical staging based on urine collection following prostatic massage.

Authors:  Kostyantyn A Nekrasov; Mark V Vikarchuk; Evgeniya E Rudenko; Igor V Ivanitskiy; Viacheslav M Grygorenko; Rostyslav O Danylets; Alexander G Kondratov; Liubov A Stoliar; Bizhan R Sharopov; Volodymyr I Kashuba
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2019-10-29       Impact factor: 2.967

4.  Statin medications are associated with a lower probability of having an abnormal screening prostate-specific antigen result.

Authors:  Ying Shi; Kathy Z Fung; Stephen J Freedland; Richard M Hoffman; Victoria L Tang; Louise C Walter
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2014-10-24       Impact factor: 2.649

5.  Probability of an abnormal screening prostate-specific antigen result based on age, race, and prostate-specific antigen threshold.

Authors:  Roxanne Espaldon; Katharine A Kirby; Kathy Z Fung; Richard M Hoffman; Adam A Powell; Stephen J Freedland; Louise C Walter
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2014-01-16       Impact factor: 2.649

6.  Patient-Provider Communication About Prostate Cancer Screening and Treatment: New Evidence From the Health Information National Trends Survey.

Authors:  Soumitra S Bhuyan; Aastha Chandak; Niodita Gupta; Sudhir Isharwal; Chad LaGrange; Asos Mahmood; Dan Gentry
Journal:  Am J Mens Health       Date:  2016-07-07

7.  Influence of Age and Comorbidity on Colorectal Cancer Screening in the Elderly.

Authors:  Carrie N Klabunde; Yingye Zheng; Virginia P Quinn; Elisabeth F Beaber; Carolyn M Rutter; Ethan A Halm; Jessica Chubak; Chyke A Doubeni; Jennifer S Haas; Aruna Kamineni; Marilyn M Schapira; Pamela M Vacek; Michael P Garcia; Douglas A Corley
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2016-06-22       Impact factor: 5.043

8.  General health checks in adults for reducing morbidity and mortality from disease.

Authors:  Lasse T Krogsbøll; Karsten Juhl Jørgensen; Peter C Gøtzsche
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-01-31

9.  Exploring factors that might influence primary-care provider discussion of and recommendation for prostate and colon cancer screening.

Authors:  Christine E Kistler; Maihan Vu; Anne Sutkowi-Hemstreet; Ziya Gizlice; Russell P Harris; Noel T Brewer; Carmen L Lewis; Rowena J Dolor; Colleen Barclay; Stacey L Sheridan
Journal:  Int J Gen Med       Date:  2018-05-17

10.  Downstream tests, treatments, and annual direct payments in older men cared for by primary care providers with high or low prostate-specific antigen screening rates using 100 percent Texas U.S. Medicare public insurance claims data: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Preeti Zanwar; Yu-Li Lin; Yong-Fang Kuo; James S Goodwin
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2016-01-15       Impact factor: 2.655

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.