Literature DB >> 23588709

A prospective, randomized, single-blind trial of 5-mm versus 3-mm ports for laparoscopic cholecystectomy: is smaller better?

M Bignell1, M P N Lewis, E C K Cheong, M Rhodes.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC) is said to provide improved cosmesis with a reduction in postoperative pain, but SILC involves a change in operative technique. A single-blind, randomized controlled trial compared cosmetic outcomes and postoperative pain between 3- and 5-mm ports used for laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC).
METHODS: For this study, 80 patients with symptomatic gallstones were recruited from a single center and randomized to a LC using either a 5-mm port and three 3-mm ports (group A) or a 10-mm port and three 5-mm ports (group B). Operative details; pain scores at 1 h, 6 h, and 1 week; and analgesia required during the first week were collected. Cosmetic outcome was assessed at 6 months using a validated questionnaire.
RESULTS: For each group, 40 patients were recruited. The two groups were well matched except for sex. Group A had 11 males, and Group B had 4 males. The mean operative time was 49 ± 12 min (range, 24-120 min) in the 3-mm group versus 46 ± 19 min (range, 21-124 min) in the control group (p = 0.40). The two groups did not differ statistically in the day case rate. The pain scores in Group A were 2.5 ± 2.1 at 1 h, 3.2 ± 2.2 at 6 h, and 0.8 ± 2.2 at 1 week versus 4.2 ± 2.9 at 1 h, 3.3 ± 2.4 at 6 h, and 2.1 ± 2.4 at 1 week in Group B (p = 0.003, 0.63, and 0.002, respectively). No difference in the analgesia consumption was observed during the first postoperative week. The patients in Group A had significantly better cosmetic outcome scores at 6 months.
CONCLUSION: The use of 3-mm ports is technically feasible in patients undergoing LC for gallstones. The operating times are comparable with those for conventional LC, whereas the pain scores are reduced, and the cosmetic outcome is better.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23588709     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-013-2933-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  17 in total

1.  Endoscopic surgery: the history, the pioneers.

Authors:  G S Litynski
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 2.  Critical appraisal of single port access cholecystectomy.

Authors:  P Allemann; M Schafer; N Demartines
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 6.939

3.  Randomized controlled trial comparing single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy and four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Jun Ma; Maria A Cassera; Georg O Spaun; Chet W Hammill; Paul D Hansen; Shaghayegh Aliabadi-Wahle
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: surgery without a visible scar.

Authors:  R Tacchino; F Greco; D Matera
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-09-25       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Prospective randomized trial of 5- and 10-mm epigastric ports in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  M Golder; M Rhodes
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 6.939

6.  Prospective randomized comparative study of single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus conventional four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Eric C H Lai; George P C Yang; Chung Ngai Tang; Patricia C L Yih; Oliver C Y Chan; Michael K W Li
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 2.565

7.  Intermediate results of a prospective randomized controlled trial of traditional four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Melissa S Phillips; Jeffrey M Marks; Kurt Roberts; Roberto Tacchino; Raymond Onders; George DeNoto; Homero Rivas; Arsalla Islam; Nathaniel Soper; Gary Gecelter; Eugene Rubach; Paraskevas Paraskeva; Sajani Shah
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-11-15       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic cholecystectomy performed with mini-instruments.

Authors:  L Sarli; D Iusco; S Gobbi; C Porrini; M Ferro; L Roncoroni
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 6.939

Review 9.  Is smaller necessarily better? A systematic review comparing the effects of minilaparoscopic and conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy on patient outcomes.

Authors:  Rory McCloy; Delia Randall; Stephan A Schug; Henrik Kehlet; Christian Simanski; Francis Bonnet; Frederic Camu; Barrie Fischer; Girish Joshi; Narinder Rawal; Edmund A M Neugebauer
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-09-20       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Postoperative pain after cholecystectomy: Conventional laparoscopy versus single-incision laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  A Prasad; K A Mukherjee; S Kaul; M Kaur
Journal:  J Minim Access Surg       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 1.407

View more
  7 in total

1.  Transvaginal hybrid NOTES cholecystectomy--results of a randomized clinical trial after 6 months.

Authors:  Dirk Rolf Bulian; Jurgen Knuth; Nicola Cerasani; Jonas Lange; Michael Alfred Ströhlein; Axel Sauerwald; Markus Maria Heiss
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2014-06-22       Impact factor: 3.445

2.  Cosmetic Appearance of Port-site Scars 1 Year After Laparoscopic Versus Robotic Sacrocolpopexy: A Supplementary Study of the ACCESS Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Elizabeth Rose Mueller; Kimberly Kenton; Jennifer T Anger; Catherine Bresee; Christopher Tarnay
Journal:  J Minim Invasive Gynecol       Date:  2016-05-12       Impact factor: 4.137

3.  Patient-Reported Outcomes for Acute Gallstone Pathology.

Authors:  Ed Parkin; Martyn Stott; Joy Brockbank; Simon Galloway; Ian Welch; Andrew Macdonald
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy with two incisions: an improved, feasible and safe technique with superior cosmetic outcomes.

Authors:  Yongfu Xu; Aidong Wang; Qiqiang Dai; Zheping Fang; Zhenyu Li
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 1.671

5.  Evidence-based surgery for laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Andrea T Fisher; Kovi E Bessoff; Rida I Khan; Gavin C Touponse; Maggie M K Yu; Advait A Patil; Jeff Choi; Christopher D Stave; Joseph D Forrester
Journal:  Surg Open Sci       Date:  2022-08-18

6.  Longitudinal versus transverse hip arthroscopy portal cosmesis: a case-control trial of simultaneous bilateral cases.

Authors:  Sina Babazadeh; Matthew J Kraeutler; Tigran Garabekyan; K Linnea Welton; Omer Mei-Dan
Journal:  J Hip Preserv Surg       Date:  2019-09-09

7.  Identification and categorisation of relevant outcomes for symptomatic uncomplicated gallstone disease: in-depth analysis to inform the development of a core outcome set.

Authors:  Moira Cruickshank; Rumana Newlands; Jane Blazeby; Irfan Ahmed; Mohamed Bekheit; Miriam Brazzelli; Bernard Croal; Karen Innes; Craig Ramsay; Katie Gillies
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-06-24       Impact factor: 2.692

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.