Literature DB >> 9717997

Prospective randomized trial of 5- and 10-mm epigastric ports in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

M Golder1, M Rhodes.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  1998        PMID： 9717997     DOI： 10.1046/j.1365-2168.1998.00799.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Surg        ISSN： 0007-1323            Impact factor:   6.939


× No keyword cloud information.
  5 in total

1.  Assessment of cosmetic outcome after laparoscopic cholecystectomy among women 4 years after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: is there a problem?

Authors:  Mark Bignell; Andrew Hindmarsh; Haritharan Nageswaran; Bhavani Mothe; Andrew Jenkinson; David Mahon; Michael Rhodes
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-03-18       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  A procedure-specific systematic review and consensus recommendations for postoperative analgesia following laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  H Kehlet; A W Gray; F Bonnet; F Camu; H B J Fischer; R F McCloy; E A M Neugebauer; M M Puig; N Rawal; C J P Simanski
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-08-11       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  A prospective, randomized, single-blind trial of 5-mm versus 3-mm ports for laparoscopic cholecystectomy: is smaller better?

Authors:  M Bignell; M P N Lewis; E C K Cheong; M Rhodes
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-04-16       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: do patients care?

Authors:  Kalman P Bencsath; Gavin Falk; Gareth Morris-Stiff; Matthew Kroh; R Matthew Walsh; Sricharan Chalikonda
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2011-11-29       Impact factor: 3.452

5.  Three-port microlaparoscopic cholecystectomy in 159 patients.

Authors:  P L Leggett; C D Bissell; R Churchman-Winn; C Ahn
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2000-12-12       Impact factor: 4.584
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.