Literature DB >> 23588624

Hepatic arterial nodal metastases in pancreatic cancer: is this the node of importance?

J LaFemina1, J F Chou, M Gönen, F G Rocha, C Correa-Gallego, T P Kingham, Y Fong, M I D'Angelica, W R Jarnagin, R P DeMatteo, P J Allen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The hepatic artery lymph node (HALN) is frequently sampled during pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). Data suggest that survival in the setting of HALN metastases is similar to that of stage IV pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). The objectives of this study were to describe the prognostic significance of HALN metastases and to assess the predictive performance of HALN compared to peripancreatic lymph node status.
METHODS: Patients undergoing PD for PDAC from January 2000-October 2010 were identified from a prospectively maintained database. Patients were included if during PD the HALN was submitted for pathologic evaluation. Patients were excluded if margins were macroscopically positive, if pathology was found to be consistent with a diagnosis other than PDAC. Overall (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were estimated by Kaplan-Meier methods.
RESULTS: Of the 671 patients who underwent PD for PDAC, HALN status was analyzed for 147 patients. HALN was positive in 23 patients (16 %), 38 were peripancreatic lymph node (PPLN) and HALN negative, and 86 were PPLN+/HALN-. Median follow-up for survivors was 10 months. In a multivariable model, lymph node status and tumor differentiation predicted OS and DFS. Hazard of death and relapse/death were highest among the HALN+ patients (hazard ratio [HR] 2.94; p = 0.017 and HR 2.66; p = 0.011, respectively). Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed significant differences in OS (p = 0.017) and DFS (p = 0.013) based on lymph node status.
CONCLUSIONS: OS and DFS are significantly reduced in patients with a positive HALN. Differentiation and lymph node status were predictors of OS and DFS. In the multivariate models, differentiation and lymph node status remain independent predictors of OS and DFS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23588624     DOI: 10.1007/s11605-012-2071-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg        ISSN: 1091-255X            Impact factor:   3.452


  6 in total

1.  Lymphatic flow in carcinoma of the head of the pancreas.

Authors:  M Kayahara; T Nagakawa; H Kobayashi; K Mori; T Nakano; N Kadoya; T Ohta; K Ueno; I Miyazaki
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1992-10-15       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  Impact of regional lymph node evaluation in staging patients with periampullary tumors.

Authors:  Shishir K Maithel; Korosh Khalili; Elijah Dixon; Maha Guindi; Mark P Callery; Mark S Cattral; Bryce R Taylor; Steven Gallinger; Paul D Greig; David R Grant; Charles M Vollmer
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 5.344

3.  Survival of patients with periampullary carcinoma is predicted by lymph node 8a but not by lymph node 16b1 status.

Authors:  S Connor; L Bosonnet; P Ghaneh; N Alexakis; M Hartley; F Campbell; R Sutton; J P Neoptolemos
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 6.939

4.  Argyrophilic nucleolar organizer region counts in exocrine pancreatic tumors.

Authors:  T Ohta; T Nagakawa; Y Tsukioka; K Mori; M Kayahara; M Kanno; K Ueno; I Miyazaki; T Terada; Y Nakanuma
Journal:  Int J Pancreatol       Date:  1992-12

5.  Significance of common hepatic artery lymph node metastases during pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic head adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Fernando Cordera; Cletus A Arciero; Tianyu Li; James C Watson; John P Hoffman
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2007-05-10       Impact factor: 5.344

6.  Pancreatic adenocarcinoma: the actual 5-year survivors.

Authors:  Cristina R Ferrone; Murray F Brennan; Mithat Gonen; Daniel G Coit; Yuman Fong; Sun Chung; Laura Tang; David Klimstra; Peter J Allen
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2007-11-20       Impact factor: 3.452

  6 in total
  4 in total

1.  The role of hepatic artery lymph node in pancreatic adenocarcinoma: prognostic factor or a selection criterion for surgery.

Authors:  Prejesh Philips; Erik Dunki-Jacobs; Steven C Agle; Charles Scoggins; Kelly M McMasters; Robert C G Martin
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2014-08-15       Impact factor: 3.647

2.  Accurate prediction of nodal status in preoperative patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma using next-gen nanoparticle.

Authors:  Shaunagh McDermott; Sarah P Thayer; Carlos Fernandez-Del Castillo; Mari Mino-Kenudson; Ralph Weissleder; Mukesh G Harisinghani
Journal:  Transl Oncol       Date:  2013-12-01       Impact factor: 4.243

Review 3.  Prognostic value of lymph node metastases detected during surgical exploration for pancreatic or periampullary cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Lennart B van Rijssen; Poorvi Narwade; Nadine C M van Huijgevoort; Dorine S J Tseng; Hjalmar C van Santvoort; Isaac Q Molenaar; Hanneke W M van Laarhoven; Casper H J van Eijck; Olivier R C Busch; Marc G H Besselink
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2016-05-27       Impact factor: 3.647

4.  Incidence and prognostic impact of para-aortic lymph nodes metastases during pancreaticoduodenectomy for peri-ampullary cancer.

Authors:  Gennaro Nappo; Domenico Borzomati; Giuseppe Perrone; Sergio Valeri; Michela Amato; Tommasangelo Petitti; Roberto Coppola
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2015-09-03       Impact factor: 3.647

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.