Literature DB >> 15515111

Survival of patients with periampullary carcinoma is predicted by lymph node 8a but not by lymph node 16b1 status.

S Connor1, L Bosonnet, P Ghaneh, N Alexakis, M Hartley, F Campbell, R Sutton, J P Neoptolemos.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to assess the impact of metastatic disease in lymph nodes 8a and 16b1 (as defined by the Japanese Pancreas Society) on survival in patients with periampullary malignancy.
METHODS: Patients undergoing resection for primary pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma or intrapancreatic bile duct adenocarcinoma were identified from a prospective database (September 1997-May 2003).
RESULTS: Thirteen of 54 and ten of 44 evaluable patients had metastatic involvement of lymph nodes 8a and 16b1 respectively. Metastatic involvement of lymph node 8a was associated with a significantly shorter median survival (197 versus 470 days; P = 0.003) but metastatic involvement of lymph node 16b1 did not affect survival (457 versus 503 days; P = 0.185). Multivariate analysis showed lymph node 8a status to be the strongest predictor of outcome (P = 0.006). Median survival of those with metastatic lymph node 8a was not significantly different from that of 81 patients with overt metastatic periampullary cancer at the time of diagnosis (98 days; P = 0.072)
CONCLUSION: Lymph node 8a was an independent prognostic factor in patients with periampullary malignancy, but lymph node 16b1 was not. Survival in those with metastatic lymph node 8a was not significantly different from that in patients with metastatic disease at presentation. Preoperative determination of lymph node 8a status may have important implications in selecting patients for treatment. Copyright 2004 British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15515111     DOI: 10.1002/bjs.4761

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Surg        ISSN: 0007-1323            Impact factor:   6.939


  16 in total

1.  Prognostic impact of para-aortic lymph node metastasis in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Yoshiaki Murakami; Kenichiro Uemura; Takeshi Sudo; Yasushi Hashimoto; Yoshio Yuasa; Taijiro Sueda
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 2.  Biology and management of pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Paula Ghaneh; Eithne Costello; John P Neoptolemos
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 3.  Mesopancreas: A boundless structure, namely the rationale for dissection of the paraaortic area in pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic head carcinoma.

Authors:  Nadia Peparini
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-03-14       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  The role of hepatic artery lymph node in pancreatic adenocarcinoma: prognostic factor or a selection criterion for surgery.

Authors:  Prejesh Philips; Erik Dunki-Jacobs; Steven C Agle; Charles Scoggins; Kelly M McMasters; Robert C G Martin
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2014-08-15       Impact factor: 3.647

5.  Para-Aortic Dissection in Pancreaticoduodenectomy with Mesopancreas Excision for Pancreatic Head Carcinoma: Not Only an N-Staging Matter.

Authors:  Nadia Peparini
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2016-03-21       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 6.  Positive para-aortic lymph nodes following pancreatectomy for pancreatic cancer. Systematic review and meta-analysis of impact on short term survival and association with clinicopathologic features.

Authors:  Christos Agalianos; Nikolaos Gouvas; Kleo Papaparaskeva; Christos Dervenis
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2016-06-03       Impact factor: 3.647

7.  Hepatic arterial nodal metastases in pancreatic cancer: is this the node of importance?

Authors:  J LaFemina; J F Chou; M Gönen; F G Rocha; C Correa-Gallego; T P Kingham; Y Fong; M I D'Angelica; W R Jarnagin; R P DeMatteo; P J Allen
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2013-04-16       Impact factor: 3.452

8.  Lymph node ratio versus number of affected lymph nodes as predictors of survival for resected pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Imran Bhatti; Oliver Peacock; Altaf K Awan; David Semeraro; Michael Larvin; Richard I Hall
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 3.352

9.  Nodal sampling in pancreaticoduodenectomy: does it change our management?

Authors:  Roozbeh Rassadi; Paul R Tarnasky; Jeffrey D Linder; A Joe Saad; D Rohan Jeyarajah
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 3.647

Review 10.  Prognostic value of lymph node metastases detected during surgical exploration for pancreatic or periampullary cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Lennart B van Rijssen; Poorvi Narwade; Nadine C M van Huijgevoort; Dorine S J Tseng; Hjalmar C van Santvoort; Isaac Q Molenaar; Hanneke W M van Laarhoven; Casper H J van Eijck; Olivier R C Busch; Marc G H Besselink
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2016-05-27       Impact factor: 3.647

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.