Literature DB >> 23584962

Bioenergetics of photoheterotrophic bacteria in the oceans.

David L Kirchman1, Thomas E Hanson.   

Abstract

Photoheterotrophic microbes, such as proteorhodopsin (PR)-based phototrophic (PRP) and aerobic anoxygenic phototrophic (AAP) bacteria, are well known to be abundant in the oceans, potentially playing unique roles in biogeochemical cycles. However, the contribution of phototrophy to the energy requirements of these bacteria has not been quantitatively examined to date. To better understand the implications of photoheterophy in the oceans, we calculated energy benefits and costs of phototrophy and compared net benefits with maintenance costs. Benefits depend on the number of photosynthetic units (PSUs), absorption cross-section area of each PSU as function of wavelength, the in situ light quality, and the energy yield per absorbed photon. For costs we considered the energy required for the synthesis of pigments, amino acids and proteins in each PSU. Our calculations indicate that AAP bacteria harvest more light energy than do PRP bacteria, but the costs of phototrophy are much higher for AAP bacteria. Still, the net energy gained by AAP bacteria is often sufficient to meet maintenance costs, while that is not the case for PRP bacteria except with high light intensities and large numbers of proteorhodopsin molecules per cell. The low costs and simplicity of PR-based phototrophy explain the high abundance of proteorhodopsin genes in the oceans. However, even for AAP bacteria, the net energy yield of phototrophy is apparently too low to influence the distribution of photoheterotrophic bacteria among various marine systems.
© 2012 Society for Applied Microbiology and Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23584962     DOI: 10.1111/j.1758-2229.2012.00367.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Microbiol Rep        ISSN: 1758-2229            Impact factor:   3.541


  26 in total

1.  The variability of light-harvesting complexes in aerobic anoxygenic phototrophs.

Authors:  Vadim Selyanin; Dzmitry Hauruseu; Michal Koblížek
Journal:  Photosynth Res       Date:  2015-10-19       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Ecological Genomics of the Uncultivated Marine Roseobacter Lineage CHAB-I-5.

Authors:  Yao Zhang; Ying Sun; Nianzhi Jiao; Ramunas Stepanauskas; Haiwei Luo
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2016-01-29       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Distribution and Diversity of Rhodopsin-Producing Microbes in the Chesapeake Bay.

Authors:  Julia A Maresca; Kelsey J Miller; Jessica L Keffer; Chandran R Sabanayagam; Barbara J Campbell
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2018-06-18       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Winter diversity and expression of proteorhodopsin genes in a polar ocean.

Authors:  Dan Nguyen; Roxane Maranger; Vanessa Balagué; Montserrat Coll-Lladó; Connie Lovejoy; Carlos Pedrós-Alió
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2015-02-20       Impact factor: 10.302

5.  acI Actinobacteria Assemble a Functional Actinorhodopsin with Natively Synthesized Retinal.

Authors:  Jeffrey R Dwulit-Smith; Joshua J Hamilton; David M Stevenson; Shaomei He; Ben O Oyserman; Francisco Moya-Flores; Sarahi L Garcia; Daniel Amador-Noguez; Katherine D McMahon; Katrina T Forest
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2018-11-30       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  Comparable light stimulation of organic nutrient uptake by SAR11 and Prochlorococcus in the North Atlantic subtropical gyre.

Authors:  Paola R Gómez-Pereira; Manuela Hartmann; Carolina Grob; Glen A Tarran; Adrian P Martin; Bernhard M Fuchs; David J Scanlan; Mikhail V Zubkov
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2012-10-25       Impact factor: 10.302

Review 7.  Microbial oceanography and the Hawaii Ocean Time-series programme.

Authors:  David M Karl; Matthew J Church
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2014-08-26       Impact factor: 60.633

Review 8.  Harnessing the power of microbial autotrophy.

Authors:  Nico J Claassens; Diana Z Sousa; Vitor A P Martins Dos Santos; Willem M de Vos; John van der Oost
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2016-09-26       Impact factor: 60.633

Review 9.  Marine Bacterial and Archaeal Ion-Pumping Rhodopsins: Genetic Diversity, Physiology, and Ecology.

Authors:  Jarone Pinhassi; Edward F DeLong; Oded Béjà; José M González; Carlos Pedrós-Alió
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  2016-09-14       Impact factor: 11.056

10.  Using total internal reflection fluorescence microscopy to visualize rhodopsin-containing cells.

Authors:  J L Keffer; C R Sabanayagam; M E Lee; E F DeLong; M W Hahn; J A Maresca
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2015-03-13       Impact factor: 4.792

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.