Literature DB >> 28565284

DOES EVOLUTIONARY PLASTICITY EVOLVE?

Andreas Wagner1.   

Abstract

During the development of a multicellular organism from a zygote, a large number of epigenetic interactions take place on every level of suborganismal organization. This raises the possibility that the system of epigenetic interactions may compensate or "buffer" some of the changes that occur as mutations on its lowest levels, and thus stabilize the phenotype with respect to mutations. This hypothetical phenomenon will be called "epigenetic stability." Its potential importance stems from the fact that phenotypic variation with a genetic basis is an essential prerequisite for evolution. Thus, variation in epigenetic stability might profoundly affect attainable rates of evolution. While representing a systemic property of a developmental system, epigenetic stability might itself be genetically determined and thus be subject to evolutionary change. Whether or not this is the case should ideally be answered directly, that is, by experimentation. The time scale involved and our insufficient quantitative understanding of developmental pathways will probably preclude such an approach in the foreseeable future. Preliminary answers are sought here by using a biochemically motivated model of a small but central part of a developmental pathway. Modeled are sets of transcriptional regulators that mutually regulate each other's expression and thereby form stable gene expression patterns. Such gene-expression patterns, crucially involved in determining developmental pattern formation events, are most likely subject to strong stabilizing natural selection. After long periods of stabilizing selection, the fraction of mutations causing changes in gene-expression patterns is substantially reduced in the model. Epigenetic stability has increased. This phenomenon is found for widely varying regulatory scenarios among transcription factor genes. It is discussed that only epistatic (nonlinear) gene interactions can cause such change in epigenetic stability. Evidence from paleontology, molecular evolution, development, and genetics, consistent with the existence of variation in epigenetic stability, is discussed. The relation of epigenetic stability to developmental canalization is outlined. Experimental scenarios are suggested that may provide further evidence. © 1996 The Society for the Study of Evolution.

Keywords:  Developmental canalization; epigenetic system; epistatic gene interactions; gene networks; neutral mutations; transcriptional regulators

Year:  1996        PMID: 28565284     DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1996.tb02342.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  50 in total

1.  On the evolution of primitive genetic codes.

Authors:  Günter Weberndorfer; Ivo L Hofacker; Peter F Stadler
Journal:  Orig Life Evol Biosph       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 1.950

2.  Evolutionary capacitance may be favored by natural selection.

Authors:  Joanna Masel
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-05-23       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Impact of epistasis and pleiotropy on evolutionary adaptation.

Authors:  Bjørn Ostman; Arend Hintze; Christoph Adami
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-06-22       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Genetic redundancy caused by gene duplications and its evolution in networks of transcriptional regulators.

Authors:  A Wagner
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 2.086

5.  Surviving evolutionary escape on complex genotype-phenotype networks.

Authors:  Esther Ibáñez-Marcelo; Tomás Alarcón
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2015-05-23       Impact factor: 2.259

6.  Design specifications for cellular regulation.

Authors:  David C Krakauer; Lydia Müller; Sonja J Prohaska; Peter F Stadler
Journal:  Theory Biosci       Date:  2016-11-18       Impact factor: 1.919

7.  Long-term evolution on complex fitness landscapes when mutation is weak.

Authors:  David M McCandlish
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2018-09-19       Impact factor: 3.821

Review 8.  Decanalizing thinking on genetic canalization.

Authors:  Kerry Geiler-Samerotte; Federica M O Sartori; Mark L Siegal
Journal:  Semin Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2018-05-24       Impact factor: 7.727

9.  Dynamics of hybrid incompatibility in gene networks in a constant environment.

Authors:  Michael E Palmer; Marcus W Feldman
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 3.694

10.  Genes confer similar robustness to environmental, stochastic, and genetic perturbations in yeast.

Authors:  Ben Lehner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-02-03       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.