Literature DB >> 24928234

How do risk factors for mortality and overall complication rates following laparoscopic and open colectomy differ between inpatient and post-discharge phases of care? A retrospective cohort study from NSQIP.

Matthew Z Wilson1, Peter W Dillon, Christopher S Hollenbeak, David B Stewart.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Risk factors for complications differ between laparoscopic (LC) and open colectomy (OC) patients, given the selection bias between these groups. How risk factors for these outcomes differ between inpatient and post-discharge phases of care requires further study.
METHODS: A retrospective cohort study (2005-2010) using NSQIP data was performed comparing OC and LC patients. Multivariable logistic regression was used to compare covariates associated with mortality and overall complication rates both before and after hospital discharge.
RESULTS: Patients in the LC cohort were younger (64.2 vs. 62.5 years; P < 0.0001) with a lower incidence of comorbidities. OC was associated with a higher incidence of mortality compared to LC among inpatients (3.3 vs. 0.61%, P < 0.0001) and following discharge (0.88 vs. 0.29%, P < 0.0001). OC also demonstrated a higher incidence of overall complication rates for both inpatients (22.32 vs. 9.36%, P < 0.0001) and following discharge (8.83 vs. 7.24%, P < 0.0001). Risk factors (P < 0.05) for mortality following LC included age and emergency procedures for inpatients; pre-operative SIRS was associated with mortality occurring after discharge. For the OC cohort, risk for mortality was increased with smoking and contaminated/dirty wounds for inpatients; pre-operative weight loss was associated with death following discharge. Factors associated with increased risk of morbidity following LC included smoking history for inpatients and pre-operative steroid therapy following discharge. Following OC, morbidity was strongly associated with ASA scores for inpatients; pre-operative steroid therapy was a risk factor following discharge. Obesity was strongly associated with non-mortal complications in both cohorts following discharge.
CONCLUSIONS: (1) LC is associated with a lower incidence of post-operative mortality and complications. (2) Risk factors associated with adverse post-operative outcomes change during the post-operative period; surveillance for these outcomes should be tailored by operative technique and phase of post-operative care (3) Obesity is an underappreciated risk for complications following discharge for both LC and OC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24928234     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-014-3609-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  15 in total

1.  Is laparoscopic surgery for recurrent Crohn's disease beneficial in patients with previous primary resection through midline laparotomy? A case-matched study.

Authors:  Erman Aytac; Luca Stocchi; Feza H Remzi; Ravi P Kiran
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-05-31       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  Systematic review and meta-analysis of laparoscopic versus open colectomy with end ileostomy for non-toxic colitis.

Authors:  S A L Bartels; T J Gardenbroek; D T Ubbink; C J Buskens; P J Tanis; W A Bemelman
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2013-01-25       Impact factor: 6.939

3.  Impact of operative duration on postoperative pulmonary complications in laparoscopic versus open colectomy.

Authors:  Rachel M Owen; Sebastian D Perez; Nathan Lytle; Ankit Patel; S S Davis; Edward Lin; John F Sweeney
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-04-13       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Routine upper gastrointestinal imaging is superior to clinical signs for detecting gastrojejunal leak after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.

Authors:  Daniel B Leslie; Robert B Dorman; Joel Anderson; Federico J Serrot; Todd A Kellogg; Henry Buchwald; Barbara K Sampson; Bridget M Slusarek; Sayeed Ikramuddin
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 6.113

5.  Risk factors for readmission after elective colectomy: postoperative complications are more important than patient and operative factors.

Authors:  Therese G Kerwel; Stefan W Leichtle; Theodor Asgeirsson; Samantha K Hendren; Robert K Cleary; Martin A Luchtefeld
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 4.585

6.  The impact of visceral obesity on surgical outcomes of laparoscopic surgery for colon cancer.

Authors:  Jun Watanabe; Kenji Tatsumi; Mitsuyoshi Ota; Yusuke Suwa; Shinsuke Suzuki; Akira Watanabe; Atsushi Ishibe; Kazuteru Watanabe; Hirotoshi Akiyama; Yasushi Ichikawa; Satoshi Morita; Itaru Endo
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2013-12-03       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  Total abdominal colectomy for severe ulcerative colitis: does the laparoscopic approach really have benefit?

Authors:  Jinyu Gu; Luca Stocchi; Feza H Remzi; Ravi P Kiran
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-10-03       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Laparoscopic-assisted vs. open colectomy for cancer: comparison of short-term outcomes from 121 hospitals.

Authors:  Karl Y Bilimoria; David J Bentrem; Ryan P Merkow; Heidi Nelson; Edward Wang; Clifford Y Ko; Nathaniel J Soper
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2008-06-24       Impact factor: 3.452

9.  Laparoscopic colectomy is associated with a lower incidence of postoperative complications than open colectomy: a propensity score-matched cohort analysis.

Authors:  M Z Wilson; C S Hollenbeak; D B Stewart
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 3.788

10.  A statewide colectomy experience: the role of full bowel preparation in preventing surgical site infection.

Authors:  Edward K Kim; Kyle H Sheetz; Julie Bonn; Scott DeRoo; Christopher Lee; Isaac Stein; Arya Zarinsefat; Shijie Cai; Darrell A Campbell; Michael J Englesbe
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 12.969

View more
  5 in total

1.  Laparoscopic vs open partial colectomy in elderly patients: Insights from the American College of Surgeons - National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database.

Authors:  Umashankkar Kannan; Vemuru Sunil K Reddy; Amar N Mukerji; Vellore S Parithivel; Ajay K Shah; Brian F Gilchrist; Daniel T Farkas
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-12-07       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Influence of Liver Disease on Perioperative Outcome After Bariatric Surgery in a Northern German Cohort.

Authors:  Stefan Wolter; Anna Duprée; Christina Coelius; Alexander El Gammal; Johannes Kluwe; Nina Sauer; Oliver Mann
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 4.129

Review 3.  What have we learned in minimally invasive colorectal surgery from NSQIP and NIS large databases? A systematic review.

Authors:  Gabriela Batista Rodríguez; Andrea Balla; Santiago Corradetti; Carmen Martinez; Pilar Hernández; Jesús Bollo; Eduard M Targarona
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2018-04-06       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Trends in utilization of laparoscopic colectomy according to race: an analysis of the NIS database.

Authors:  Erik J DeAngelis; James A Zebley; Ikechukwu S Ileka; Sangrag Ganguli; Armon Panahi; Richard L Amdur; Khashayar Vaziri; Juliet Lee; Hope T Jackson
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2022-06-22       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Mentorship Programs in Bariatric Surgery Reduce Perioperative Complication Rate at Equal Short-Term Outcome-Results from the OPTIMIZE Trial.

Authors:  Stefan Wolter; Anna Duprée; Alexander ElGammal; Norbert Runkel; Johannes Heimbucher; Jakob R Izbicki; Oliver Mann; Philipp Busch
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 4.129

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.