Literature DB >> 29654184

Changes in the Rumen Epithelial Microbiota of Cattle and Host Gene Expression in Response to Alterations in Dietary Carbohydrate Composition.

R M Petri1, M T Kleefisch2, B U Metzler-Zebeli2, Q Zebeli2, F Klevenhusen1.   

Abstract

The inclusion of high-quality hay (HQH), in place of concentrates, shifts dietary carbohydrate intake, and the extent to which these shifts effect epimural microbiota and epithelial gene expression of the rumen has not yet been evaluated. Eight ruminally cannulated nonlactating Holstein cows were used in a replicated 4 by 4 Latin square design with four dietary treatments containing HQH, with either 0% concentrate/100% HQH (100HQH), 25% concentrate/75% HQH (75HQH), or 40% concentrate/60% HQH (60HQH). The fourth group (control [CON]) was fed 60% normal fiber-rich hay and 40% concentrate. The data showed that measures of diversity for the rumen epimural population, specifically the Shannon (P = 0.004) and Simpson (P = 0.003) indices, decreased with increasing levels of HQH in the diet. The feeding of HQH shifted the epimural population from predominantly Firmicutes to Proteobacteria Phylogenetic analysis revealed that HQH feeding markedly shifted the abundance of Campylobacter spp. from 7.8 up to 33.5% (P < 0.001), with greater ingestion of protein (r = 0.63) and sugars (r = 0.65) in HQH diet being responsible for this shift. The expression of genes targeting intracellular pH regulation, barrier function, and nutrient uptake of rumen epithelium remained stable regardless of the carbohydrate source. In conclusion, the data suggest strong alterations of the ruminal epimural microbiota in response to changes in the nutritive patterns of the diet. Further research is warranted to evaluate the long-term effects of these significant microbial changes on rumen health and food safety aspects in cattle at a transcriptional level.IMPORTANCE Feeding of forages versus starchy concentrates is a highly debated topic. Hay is believed to be healthier and more ecological sustainable for cattle than are concentrates, although the effects of feeding hay with enhanced sugar and protein content on epimural microbiota and host gene expression have not yet been evaluated. This research provides a report of the role of feeding hay with increased sugar and protein content in place of starchy concentrates in altering epimural microbiota and in generating a host response. Our research shows that the addition of high-quality hay to dairy rations shifted nutrient intake, resulting in strong alterations in the epimural microbiota in cattle. This work provides a background for further long-term research regarding the effects of feeding practices on the host-microbiome interaction and its role in rumen health and food safety in cattle.
Copyright © 2018 American Society for Microbiology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  epimural; epimural microbiota; gene expression; hay; protein

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29654184      PMCID: PMC5981066          DOI: 10.1128/AEM.00384-18

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 0099-2240            Impact factor:   4.792


  39 in total

1.  Sheep rumen and omasum primary cultures and source epithelia: barrier function aligns with expression of tight junction proteins.

Authors:  Friederike Stumpff; Maria-Ifigenia Georgi; Lars Mundhenk; Imtiaz Rabbani; Michael Fromm; Holger Martens; Dorothee Günzel
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2011-09-01       Impact factor: 3.312

2.  Effects of the replacement of concentrate and fibre-rich hay by high-quality hay on chewing, rumination and nutrient digestibility in non-lactating Holstein cows.

Authors:  Maria-Theresia Kleefisch; Qendrim Zebeli; Elke Humer; Iris Kröger; Paul Ertl; Fenja Klevenhusen
Journal:  Arch Anim Nutr       Date:  2016-11-18       Impact factor: 2.242

3.  Rumen epithelial adaptation to ruminal acidosis in lactating cattle involves the coordinated expression of insulin-like growth factor-binding proteins and a cholesterolgenic enzyme.

Authors:  M A Steele; L Dionissopoulos; O AlZahal; J Doelman; B W McBride
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 4.034

4.  Epithelial response to high-grain diets involves alteration in nutrient transporters and Na+/K+-ATPase mRNA expression in rumen and colon of goats.

Authors:  B U Metzler-Zebeli; M Hollmann; S Sabitzer; L Podstatzky-Lichtenstein; D Klein; Q Zebeli
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2013-07-03       Impact factor: 3.159

5.  Bovine rumen epithelium undergoes rapid structural adaptations during grain-induced subacute ruminal acidosis.

Authors:  Michael A Steele; Jim Croom; Melissa Kahler; Ousama AlZahal; Sarah E Hook; Kees Plaizier; Brian W McBride
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2011-03-30       Impact factor: 3.619

Review 6.  Ruminal acidosis in beef cattle: the current microbiological and nutritional outlook.

Authors:  T G Nagaraja; E C Titgemeyer
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 4.034

7.  High-grain feeding causes strong shifts in ruminal epithelial bacterial community and expression of Toll-like receptor genes in goats.

Authors:  Jun-Hua Liu; Gao-Rui Bian; Wei-Yun Zhu; Sheng-Yong Mao
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2015-03-02       Impact factor: 5.640

8.  Microbiota-liberated host sugars facilitate post-antibiotic expansion of enteric pathogens.

Authors:  Katharine M Ng; Jessica A Ferreyra; Steven K Higginbottom; Jonathan B Lynch; Purna C Kashyap; Smita Gopinath; Natasha Naidu; Biswa Choudhury; Bart C Weimer; Denise M Monack; Justin L Sonnenburg
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2013-09-01       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Induction of Subacute Ruminal Acidosis Affects the Ruminal Microbiome and Epithelium.

Authors:  Joshua C McCann; Shaoyu Luan; Felipe C Cardoso; Hooman Derakhshani; Ehsan Khafipour; Juan J Loor
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2016-05-18       Impact factor: 5.640

10.  Maintaining stability of the rumen ecosystem is associated with changes of microbial composition and epithelial TLR signaling.

Authors:  Hong Shen; Zhan Chen; Zanming Shen; Zhongyan Lu
Journal:  Microbiologyopen       Date:  2017-01-21       Impact factor: 3.139

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Effects and immune responses of probiotic treatment in ruminants.

Authors:  Sarah Raabis; Wenli Li; Laura Cersosimo
Journal:  Vet Immunol Immunopathol       Date:  2019-01-06       Impact factor: 2.046

2.  Solid diet manipulates rumen epithelial microbiota and its interactions with host transcriptomic in young ruminants.

Authors:  Jianmin Chai; Xiaokang Lv; Qiyu Diao; Hunter Usdrowski; Yimin Zhuang; Wenqin Huang; Kai Cui; Naifeng Zhang
Journal:  Environ Microbiol       Date:  2021-09-20       Impact factor: 5.476

3.  Unveiling the Bovine Epimural Microbiota Composition and Putative Function.

Authors:  Cátia Pacífico; Renée Maxine Petri; Sara Ricci; Elsayed Mickdam; Stefanie Urimare Wetzels; Viktoria Neubauer; Qendrim Zebeli
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2021-02-09

4.  Progressive microbial adaptation of the bovine rumen and hindgut in response to a step-wise increase in dietary starch and the influence of phytogenic supplementation.

Authors:  Sara Ricci; Cátia Pacífico; Ezequias Castillo-Lopez; Raul Rivera-Chacon; Heidi E Schwartz-Zimmermann; Nicole Reisinger; Franz Berthiller; Qendrim Zebeli; Renee M Petri
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-07-22       Impact factor: 6.064

5.  Characterization of microbial intolerances and ruminal dysbiosis towards different dietary carbohydrate sources using an in vitro model.

Authors:  Parisa Kheirandish; Renee Maxine Petri; Arife Sener-Aydemir; Heidi Elisabeth Schwartz-Zimmermann; Franz Berthiller; Qendrim Zebeli; Cátia Pacífico
Journal:  J Appl Microbiol       Date:  2022-04-18       Impact factor: 4.059

6.  Feed Additives Differentially Impact the Epimural Microbiota and Host Epithelial Gene Expression of the Bovine Rumen Fed Diets Rich in Concentrates.

Authors:  Renee Maxine Petri; Viktoria Neubauer; Elke Humer; Iris Kröger; Nicole Reisinger; Qendrim Zebeli
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2020-02-19       Impact factor: 5.640

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.