Literature DB >> 23580454

Comparison of free-breathing with navigator-controlled acquisition regimes in abdominal diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance images: Effect on ADC and IVIM statistics.

Neil P Jerome1, Matthew R Orton, James A d'Arcy, David J Collins, Dow-Mu Koh, Martin O Leach.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect on diffusion-weighted image-derived parameters in the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and intra-voxel incoherent motion (IVIM) models from choice of either free-breathing or navigator-controlled acquisition.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Imaging was performed with consent from healthy volunteers (n = 10) on a 1.5T Siemens Avanto scanner. Parameter-matched free-breathing and navigator-controlled diffusion-weighted images were acquired, without averaging in the console, for a total scan time of ∼10 minutes. Regions of interest were drawn for renal cortex, renal pyramid, whole kidney, liver, spleen, and paraspinal muscle. An ADC diffusion model for these regions was fitted for b-values ≥ 250 s/mm(2) , using a Levenberg-Marquardt algorithm, and an IVIM model was fitted for all images using a Bayesian method.
RESULTS: ADC and IVIM parameters from the two acquisition regimes show no significant differences for the cohort; individual cases show occasional discrepancies, with outliers in parameter estimates arising more commonly from navigator-controlled scans. The navigator-controlled acquisitions showed, on average, a smaller range of movement for the kidneys (6.0 ± 1.4 vs. 10.0 ± 1.7 mm, P = 0.03), but also a smaller number of averages collected (3.9 ± 0.1 vs. 5.5 ± 0.2, P < 0.01) in the allocated time.
CONCLUSION: Navigator triggering offers no advantage in fitted diffusion parameters, whereas free-breathing appears to offer greater confidence in fitted diffusion parameters, with fewer outliers, for matched acquisition periods.
Copyright © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  abdominal; diffusion; free-breathing; motion; navigator; renal

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23580454     DOI: 10.1002/jmri.24140

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 1053-1807            Impact factor:   4.813


  25 in total

1.  Using intravoxel incoherent motion MR imaging to study the renal pathophysiological process of contrast-induced acute kidney injury in rats: Comparison with conventional DWI and arterial spin labelling.

Authors:  Long Liang; Wen-Bo Chen; Kannie W Y Chan; Yu-Guo Li; Bin Zhang; Chang-Hong Liang; Guan-Shu Liu; Shui-Xing Zhang
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-09-15       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Characterisation of solitary pulmonary lesions combining visual perfusion and quantitative diffusion MR imaging.

Authors:  Johan Coolen; Johan Vansteenkiste; Frederik De Keyzer; Herbert Decaluwé; Walter De Wever; Christophe Deroose; Christophe Dooms; Eric Verbeken; Paul De Leyn; Vincent Vandecaveye; Dirk Van Raemdonck; Kristiaan Nackaerts; Steven Dymarkowski; Johny Verschakelen
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-10-31       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 3.  Liver intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) magnetic resonance imaging: a comprehensive review of published data on normal values and applications for fibrosis and tumor evaluation.

Authors:  Yáo T Li; Jean-Pierre Cercueil; Jing Yuan; Weitian Chen; Romaric Loffroy; Yì Xiáng J Wáng
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2017-02

4.  Performance of U-net based pyramidal lucas-kanade registration on free-breathing multi-b-value diffusion MRI of the kidney.

Authors:  Jun Lv; Wenjian Huang; Jue Zhang; Xiaoying Wang
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2018-03-28       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  Assessment of renal function using intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted imaging and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI.

Authors:  Octavia Bane; Mathilde Wagner; Jeff L Zhang; Hadrien A Dyvorne; Matthew Orton; Henry Rusinek; Bachir Taouli
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2016-02-08       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 6.  Intravoxel Incoherent Motion Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Skeletal Muscle: Review and Future Directions.

Authors:  Erin K Englund; David A Reiter; Bahar Shahidi; Eric E Sigmund
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2021-08-14       Impact factor: 5.119

7.  Intravoxel incoherent motion analysis of abdominal organs: computation of reference parameters in a large cohort of C57Bl/6 mice and correlation to microvessel density.

Authors:  Christian Eberhardt; Moritz C Wurnig; Andrea Wirsching; Cristina Rossi; Markus Rottmar; Pinar S Özbay; Lukas Filli; Mickael Lesurtel; Andreas Boss
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2016-04-19       Impact factor: 2.310

Review 8.  Diffusion-weighted imaging outside the brain: Consensus statement from an ISMRM-sponsored workshop.

Authors:  Bachir Taouli; Ambros J Beer; Thomas Chenevert; David Collins; Constance Lehman; Celso Matos; Anwar R Padhani; Andrew B Rosenkrantz; Amita Shukla-Dave; Eric Sigmund; Lawrence Tanenbaum; Harriet Thoeny; Isabelle Thomassin-Naggara; Sebastiano Barbieri; Idoia Corcuera-Solano; Matthew Orton; Savannah C Partridge; Dow-Mu Koh
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2016-02-19       Impact factor: 4.813

9.  Use of the temporal median and trimmed mean mitigates effects of respiratory motion in multiple-acquisition abdominal diffusion imaging.

Authors:  N P Jerome; M R Orton; J A d'Arcy; T Feiweier; N Tunariu; D-M Koh; M O Leach; D J Collins
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2015-01-05       Impact factor: 3.609

10.  Renal Diffusion-Weighted Imaging in Healthy Dogs: Reproducibility, Test-Retest Repeatability, and Selection of the Optimal b-value Combination.

Authors:  Sang-Kwon Lee; Juryeoung Lee; Seolyn Jang; Eunji Lee; Chang-Yeop Jeon; Kyung-Seoub Lim; Yeung Bae Jin; Jihye Choi
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2021-07-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.