| Literature DB >> 23577221 |
Paulina Kleniewska1, Aleksandra Piechota-Polanczyk, Lukasz Michalski, Marta Michalska, Ewa Balcerczak, Marta Zebrowska, Anna Goraca.
Abstract
The aim of the present study was to assess whether BAY 11-7082, a nuclear factor-kappaB (NF- κ B) inhibitor, influences the level of reactive oxygen species (ROS), tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF- α), and NF- κ B related signaling pathways in the liver. The animals were divided into 4 groups: I: saline; II: saline + endothelin-1 (ET-1) (1.25 μg/kg b.w., i.v.); III: saline + ET-1 (12.5 μg/kg b.w., i.v.); and IV: BAY 11-7082 (10 mg/kg b.w., i.v.) + ET-1 (12.5 μg/kg b.w., i.v.). Injection of ET-1 alone at a dose of 12.5 μg/kg b.w. showed a significant (P < 0.001) increase in thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS) and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) level and decrease (P < 0.01) in GSH level (vs. control). ET-1 administration slightly downregulated gene expression of p65 of NF- κ B but potently and in a dose-dependent way downregulated p21-cip gene expression in the liver. BAY 11-7082 significantly decreased TBARS (P < 0.001), H2O2 (P < 0.01) and improved the redox status (P < 0.05), compared to ET-1 group. The concentration of TNF- α was increased in the presence of ET-1 (P < 0.05), while BAY 11-7082 decreased TNF- α concentration (P < 0.01). Inhibition of IkB α before ET-1 administration downregulated gene expression of p21-cip but had no effect on p65.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23577221 PMCID: PMC3612439 DOI: 10.1155/2013/308358
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Oxid Med Cell Longev ISSN: 1942-0994 Impact factor: 6.543
Effect of administration of BAY 11-7082 on oxidative stress parameters in liver homogenates of rats with endothelin-1-induced endotoxemia. Mean ± S.E.M. (n = 8).
| Parameter | 0.9% NaCl | ET-1 | ET-1 | BAY 11-7082 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TBARS ( | 5.96 ± 1.075 | 10.93 ± 1.16### | 22.26 ± 2.43∗# | 0.44 ± 0.22*** |
| H2O2 ( | 1.44 ± 0.15 | 1.79 ± 0.06**** | 2.56 ± 0.15∗ | 1.55 ± 0.19 |
| GSH/GSSG ratio | 7.13 ± 1.09 | 3.69 ± 0.27∗# | 3.84 ± 1.02#### | 7.30 ± 0.46 |
TBARS: thiobarbituric acid-reactive substances; H2O2: hydrogen peroxide; redox status: GSH/GSSG ratio; *P < 0.001,**P < 0.01, ***P < 0.02, and ****P < 0.05 versus saline; # P < 0.001, ## P < 0.01, ### P < 0.02, and #### P < 0.05 versus BAY 11-7082 + ET-1; P < 0.001, P < 0.01 versus ET-1 (1.25 mg/kg b.w.).
Figure 1Liver status of the glutathione metabolism in the control group, the endothelin-1 groups, (1.25 and 12.5 μg/kg/b.w.) and BAY 11-7082 (10 mg/kg b.w.) administered 1 hour before ET-1 (12.5 μg/kg b.w.) group (n = 8, per group). Data is shown as mean ± S.E.M. ET-1-endothelin-1 at doses of 1.25 and 12.5 μg/kg b.w.; BAY+ET-1-BAY 11-7082 (10 mg/kg b.w.) administered 1 hour before endothelin-1 (12.5 μg/kg b.w.) group; tGSH-total glutathione; GSH-reduced glutathione; GSSG-oxidized glutathione.*P < 0.001,**P < 0.01, ***P < 0.02, and ****P < 0.05 versus saline; # P < 0.001, ## P < 0.01, ### P < 0.02, and #### P < 0.05 versus BAY 11-7082 + ET-1; ∧ P < 0.001, ∧∧ P < 0.01 versus ET-1 (1.25 μg/kg b.w).
Figure 2TNF-α concentration in liver homogenates in the control group, after endothelin-1 (1.25 and 12.5 μg/kg b.w.) and BAY 11-7082 + endothelin-1 (10 mg/kg b.w. and 12.5 μg/kg b.w., resp.) group. (n = 8, per group). Data is shown as mean ± S.E.M. ET-1-endothelin-1 at doses of 1.25 and 12.5 μg/kg b.w.; BAY+ET-1-BAY 11-7082 (10 mg/kg b.w.) administered 1 hour before ET-1 (12.5 μg/kg b.w.) group; TNF-α-tumor necrosis factor; §§ P < 0.01 versus ET-1 (12.5 μg/kg).
Figure 3The p65 and p21-cip relative gene expression in the control group, after endothelin-1 (1.25 and 12.5 μg/kg b.w.) and BAY 11-7082 + endothelin-1 (10 mg/kg b.w. and 12.5 μg/kg b.w., resp.) group. (n = 4, per group). Data is shown as mean ± S.E.M.