Jay Duckett1, P Fell1, K Han1, C Kimber1, C Taylor1. 1. Department of Clinical Care and Patient Safety, North East Ambulance Service NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, UK.
Abstract
AIM: To clinically review the use of basic and advanced airway management techniques within the North East Ambulance Service National Health Service Foundation Trust (NEAS) for cardiac arrests following the introduction of the i-gel. METHOD: Two retrospective clinical audits were carried out over a monthly period (May 2011 and January 2012) using electronic and paper NEAS patient records. RESULTS: This audit confirmed that a range of basic and/or advanced airway management techniques are being successfully used to manage the airways of cardiac arrest patients. I-gel is emerging as a popular choice for maintaining and securing the airway during prehospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Success rates for i-gel insertion are higher (94%, 92%) than endotracheal (ET) tube insertion (90%, 86%). Documentation of the airway management method was poor in 11% of the records. The Quality Improvement Officers addressed this by providing individual feedback. CONCLUSIONS: I-gel shows a higher success rate in cardiac arrest patients compared to the ET tube. Staff who chose to use methods other than i-gel indicated this was a confidence issue when using new equipment. The re-audit indicated an upward trend in the popularity of i-gel; insertion is faster with a higher success rate, which allows the crew to progress with the other resuscitation measures more promptly. Airway soiling and aspiration beforehand have been reasons staff resort to ET intubation. It is anticipated by the authors that i-gel will emerge as the first choice of airway management device in prehospital cardiac arrests. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.
AIM: To clinically review the use of basic and advanced airway management techniques within the North East Ambulance Service National Health Service Foundation Trust (NEAS) for cardiac arrests following the introduction of the i-gel. METHOD: Two retrospective clinical audits were carried out over a monthly period (May 2011 and January 2012) using electronic and paper NEAS patient records. RESULTS: This audit confirmed that a range of basic and/or advanced airway management techniques are being successfully used to manage the airways of cardiac arrestpatients. I-gel is emerging as a popular choice for maintaining and securing the airway during prehospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Success rates for i-gel insertion are higher (94%, 92%) than endotracheal (ET) tube insertion (90%, 86%). Documentation of the airway management method was poor in 11% of the records. The Quality Improvement Officers addressed this by providing individual feedback. CONCLUSIONS:I-gel shows a higher success rate in cardiac arrestpatients compared to the ET tube. Staff who chose to use methods other than i-gel indicated this was a confidence issue when using new equipment. The re-audit indicated an upward trend in the popularity of i-gel; insertion is faster with a higher success rate, which allows the crew to progress with the other resuscitation measures more promptly. Airway soiling and aspiration beforehand have been reasons staff resort to ET intubation. It is anticipated by the authors that i-gel will emerge as the first choice of airway management device in prehospital cardiac arrests. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.
Authors: Jonathan R Benger; Kim Kirby; Sarah Black; Stephen J Brett; Madeleine Clout; Michelle J Lazaroo; Jerry P Nolan; Barnaby C Reeves; Maria Robinson; Lauren J Scott; Helena Smartt; Adrian South; Elizabeth A Stokes; Jodi Taylor; Matthew Thomas; Sarah Voss; Sarah Wordsworth; Chris A Rogers Journal: Health Technol Assess Date: 2022-04 Impact factor: 4.106
Authors: Sarah Voss; Megan Rhys; David Coates; Rosemary Greenwood; Jerry P Nolan; Matthew Thomas; Jonathan Benger Journal: Resuscitation Date: 2014-09-26 Impact factor: 5.262
Authors: C Jänig; A Poplawski; S Sammito; S Liebler; W Schmidbauer; T Piepho Journal: Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed Date: 2020-02-13 Impact factor: 0.840
Authors: Daniel G Ostermayer; Elizabeth A Camp; James R Langabeer; Charles A Brown; Juan Mondragon; David E Persse; Manish I Shah Journal: West J Emerg Med Date: 2019-10-21
Authors: Kamil Krzyżanowski; Daniel Ślęzak; Sebastian Dąbrowski; Przemysław Żuratyński; Wioletta Mędrzycka-Dąbrowska; Paulina Buca; Paweł Jastrzębski; Marlena Robakowska Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-04-30 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Jonathan R Benger; Kim Kirby; Sarah Black; Stephen J Brett; Madeleine Clout; Michelle J Lazaroo; Jerry P Nolan; Barnaby C Reeves; Maria Robinson; Lauren J Scott; Helena Smartt; Adrian South; Elizabeth A Stokes; Jodi Taylor; Matthew Thomas; Sarah Voss; Sarah Wordsworth; Chris A Rogers Journal: JAMA Date: 2018-08-28 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Mi Jin Lee; Tai Ho Rho; Hyun Kim; Gu Hyun Kang; June Soo Kim; Sang Gyun Rho; Hyun Kyung Park; Dong Jin Oh; Seil Oh; Jin Wi; Sangmo Je; Sung Phil Chung; Sung Oh Hwang Journal: Clin Exp Emerg Med Date: 2016-07-05