Literature DB >> 23574586

Hemispheric differences in the voluntary control of spatial attention: direct evidence for a right-hemispheric dominance within frontal cortex.

Felix Duecker1, Elia Formisano, Alexander T Sack.   

Abstract

Lesion studies in neglect patients have inspired two competing models of spatial attention control, namely, Heilman's "hemispatial" theory and Kinsbourne's "opponent processor" model. Both assume a functional asymmetry between the two hemispheres but propose very different mechanisms. Neuroimaging studies have identified a bilateral dorsal frontoparietal network underlying voluntary shifts of spatial attention. However, lateralization of attentional processes within this network has not been consistently reported. In the current study, we aimed to provide direct evidence concerning the functional asymmetry of the right and left FEF during voluntary shifts of spatial attention. To this end, we applied fMRI-guided neuronavigation to disrupt individual FEF activation foci with a longer-lasting inhibitory patterned TMS protocol followed by a spatial cueing task. Our results indicate that right FEF stimulation impaired the ability of shifting spatial attention toward both hemifields, whereas the effects of left FEF stimulation were limited to the contralateral hemifield. These results provide strong direct evidence for right-hemispheric dominance in spatial attention within frontal cortex supporting Heilman's "hemispatial" theory. This complements previous TMS studies that generally conform to Kinsbourne's "opponent processor" model after disruption of parietal cortex, and we therefore propose that both theories are not mutually exclusive.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23574586     DOI: 10.1162/jocn_a_00402

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci        ISSN: 0898-929X            Impact factor:   3.225


  20 in total

Review 1.  Anticlockwise or clockwise? A dynamic Perception-Action-Laterality model for directionality bias in visuospatial functioning.

Authors:  A K M Rezaul Karim; Michael J Proulx; Lora T Likova
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2016-06-24       Impact factor: 8.989

2.  Strong rightward lateralization of the dorsal attentional network in left-handers with right sighting-eye: an evolutionary advantage.

Authors:  Laurent Petit; Laure Zago; Emmanuel Mellet; Gaël Jobard; Fabrice Crivello; Marc Joliot; Bernard Mazoyer; Nathalie Tzourio-Mazoyer
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2014-11-19       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  FEF-Controlled Alpha Delay Activity Precedes Stimulus-Induced Gamma-Band Activity in Visual Cortex.

Authors:  Tzvetan Popov; Sabine Kastner; Ole Jensen
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-03-17       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Frontal eye fields control attentional modulation of alpha and gamma oscillations in contralateral occipitoparietal cortex.

Authors:  Tom R Marshall; Jacinta O'Shea; Ole Jensen; Til O Bergmann
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-01-28       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Transcranial direct current stimulation of the prefrontal cortex increases attention to visual target stimuli.

Authors:  Nina Vierheilig; Andreas Mühlberger; Thomas Polak; Martin J Herrmann
Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)       Date:  2016-04-08       Impact factor: 3.575

Review 6.  Asymmetric development of the nervous system.

Authors:  Amel Alqadah; Yi-Wen Hsieh; Zachery D Morrissey; Chiou-Fen Chuang
Journal:  Dev Dyn       Date:  2017-10-13       Impact factor: 3.780

7.  Bilateral parietal contributions to spatial language.

Authors:  Julie Conder; Julius Fridriksson; Gordon C Baylis; Cameron M Smith; Timothy W Boiteau; Amit Almor
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2016-09-28       Impact factor: 2.381

8.  Spatial distribution of attention and inter-hemispheric competition.

Authors:  Kao Yamaoka; Chikashi Michimata
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2015-08-20

9.  Probing the Neural Mechanisms for Distractor Filtering and Their History-Contingent Modulation by Means of TMS.

Authors:  Carlotta Lega; Oscar Ferrante; Francesco Marini; Elisa Santandrea; Luigi Cattaneo; Leonardo Chelazzi
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-08-06       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Structural Organization of the Corpus Callosum Predicts Attentional Shifts after Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation.

Authors:  Magdalena Chechlacz; Glyn W Humphreys; Stamatios N Sotiropoulos; Christopher Kennard; Dario Cazzoli
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-11-18       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.