Literature DB >> 26586822

Structural Organization of the Corpus Callosum Predicts Attentional Shifts after Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation.

Magdalena Chechlacz1, Glyn W Humphreys2, Stamatios N Sotiropoulos3, Christopher Kennard4, Dario Cazzoli5.   

Abstract

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) applied over the right posterior parietal cortex (PPC) in healthy participants has been shown to trigger a significant rightward shift in the spatial allocation of visual attention, temporarily mimicking spatial deficits observed in neglect. In contrast, rTMS applied over the left PPC triggers a weaker or null attentional shift. However, large interindividual differences in responses to rTMS have been reported. Studies measuring changes in brain activation suggest that the effects of rTMS may depend on both interhemispheric and intrahemispheric interactions between cortical loci controlling visual attention. Here, we investigated whether variability in the structural organization of human white matter pathways subserving visual attention, as assessed by diffusion magnetic resonance imaging and tractography, could explain interindividual differences in the effects of rTMS. Most participants showed a rightward shift in the allocation of spatial attention after rTMS over the right intraparietal sulcus (IPS), but the size of this effect varied largely across participants. Conversely, rTMS over the left IPS resulted in strikingly opposed individual responses, with some participants responding with rightward and some with leftward attentional shifts. We demonstrate that microstructural and macrostructural variability within the corpus callosum, consistent with differential effects on cross-hemispheric interactions, predicts both the extent and the direction of the response to rTMS. Together, our findings suggest that the corpus callosum may have a dual inhibitory and excitatory function in maintaining the interhemispheric dynamics that underlie the allocation of spatial attention. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: The posterior parietal cortex (PPC) controls allocation of attention across left versus right visual fields. Damage to this area results in neglect, characterized by a lack of spatial awareness of the side of space contralateral to the brain injury. Transcranial magnetic stimulation over the PPC is used to study cognitive mechanisms of spatial attention and to examine the potential of this technique to treat neglect. However, large individual differences in behavioral responses to stimulation have been reported. We demonstrate that the variability in the structural organization of the corpus callosum accounts for these differences. Our findings suggest novel dual mechanism of the corpus callosum function in spatial attention and have broader implications for the use of stimulation in neglect rehabilitation.
Copyright © 2015 the authors 0270-6474/15/3515353-16$15.00/0.

Entities:  

Keywords:  TMS; corpus callosum; diffusion tractography; individual differences; neglect; spatial attention

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26586822      PMCID: PMC4649006          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2610-15.2015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  114 in total

Review 1.  The role of the corpus callosum in interhemispheric transfer of information: excitation or inhibition?

Authors:  Juliana S Bloom; George W Hynd
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rev       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 7.444

2.  Hemispheric lateralization of spatial attention in right- and left-hemispheric language dominance.

Authors:  A Flöel; A Buyx; C Breitenstein; H Lohmann; S Knecht
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2005-03-30       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Neural basis and recovery of spatial attention deficits in spatial neglect.

Authors:  Maurizio Corbetta; Michelle J Kincade; Chris Lewis; Abraham Z Snyder; Ayelet Sapir
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2005-10-23       Impact factor: 24.884

4.  Sexual dimorphism in the human corpus callosum: an MRI study using the OASIS brain database.

Authors:  Babak A Ardekani; Khadija Figarsky; John J Sidtis
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2012-08-13       Impact factor: 5.357

5.  Threshold-free cluster enhancement: addressing problems of smoothing, threshold dependence and localisation in cluster inference.

Authors:  Stephen M Smith; Thomas E Nichols
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2008-04-11       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  One session of repeated parietal theta burst stimulation trains induces long-lasting improvement of visual neglect.

Authors:  Thomas Nyffeler; Dario Cazzoli; Christian W Hess; René M Müri
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2009-06-11       Impact factor: 7.914

7.  Frontal eye fields control attentional modulation of alpha and gamma oscillations in contralateral occipitoparietal cortex.

Authors:  Tom R Marshall; Jacinta O'Shea; Ole Jensen; Til O Bergmann
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-01-28       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 8.  Spatial neglect and attention networks.

Authors:  Maurizio Corbetta; Gordon L Shulman
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 12.449

9.  Explaining function with anatomy: language lateralization and corpus callosum size.

Authors:  Goulven Josse; Mohamed L Seghier; Ferath Kherif; Cathy J Price
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-12-24       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  The compensatory dynamic of inter-hemispheric interactions in visuospatial attention revealed using rTMS and fMRI.

Authors:  Ela B Plow; Zaira Cattaneo; Thomas A Carlson; George A Alvarez; Alvaro Pascual-Leone; Lorella Battelli
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-04-17       Impact factor: 3.169

View more
  11 in total

1.  Right fronto-parietal networks mediate the neurocognitive benefits of enriched environments.

Authors:  Méadhbh B Brosnan; Nir Shalev; Jivesh Ramduny; Stamatios N Sotiropoulos; Magdalena Chechlacz
Journal:  Brain Commun       Date:  2022-03-28

2.  Microstructural Injury to Corpus Callosum and Intrahemispheric White Matter Tracts Correlate With Attention and Processing Speed Decline After Brain Radiation.

Authors:  Minh-Phuong Huynh-Le; Michelle D Tibbs; Roshan Karunamuni; Mia Salans; Kathryn R Tringale; Anthony Yip; Michael Connor; Aaron B Simon; Lucas K Vitzthum; Anny Reyes; Anna Christina Macari; Vitali Moiseenko; Carrie R McDonald; Jona A Hattangadi-Gluth
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2021-01-04       Impact factor: 8.013

3.  Right hemisphere occipital rTMS impairs working memory in visualizers but not in verbalizers.

Authors:  Sven Hilbert; Michaela McAssey; Markus Bühner; Patrick Schwaferts; Monika Gruber; Stephan Goerigk; Paul Christopher John Taylor
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-04-19       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Modulating the interhemispheric activity balance in the intraparietal sulcus using real-time fMRI neurofeedback: Development and proof-of-concept.

Authors:  Tianlu Wang; Ronald Peeters; Dante Mantini; Céline R Gillebert
Journal:  Neuroimage Clin       Date:  2020-11-27       Impact factor: 4.881

5.  Functional and Structural Architectures of Allocentric and Egocentric Spatial Coding in Aging: A Combined DTI and fMRI Study.

Authors:  Abiot Y Derbie; Bolton K H Chau; Chetwyn C H Chan
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2022-01-28       Impact factor: 4.086

6.  Connectivity alterations underlying the breakdown of pseudoneglect: New insights from healthy and pathological aging.

Authors:  Chiara Bagattini; Marco Esposito; Clarissa Ferrari; Veronica Mazza; Debora Brignani
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2022-09-01       Impact factor: 5.702

7.  Offline Parietal Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation or Alpha Frequency Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation Has No Effect on Visuospatial or Temporal Attention.

Authors:  Jessica Moretti; Welber Marinovic; Alan R Harvey; Jennifer Rodger; Troy A W Visser
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2022-06-14       Impact factor: 5.152

8.  Comparative morphology of the corpus callosum across the adult lifespan in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and humans.

Authors:  René Westerhausen; Anders M Fjell; Kristiina Kompus; Steven J Schapiro; Chet C Sherwood; Kristine B Walhovd; William D Hopkins
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2020-09-26       Impact factor: 3.215

9.  The Energy Landscape of Neurophysiological Activity Implicit in Brain Network Structure.

Authors:  Shi Gu; Matthew Cieslak; Benjamin Baird; Sarah F Muldoon; Scott T Grafton; Fabio Pasqualetti; Danielle S Bassett
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-02-06       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Cyfip1 haploinsufficient rats show white matter changes, myelin thinning, abnormal oligodendrocytes and behavioural inflexibility.

Authors:  Ana I Silva; Josephine E Haddon; Yasir Ahmed Syed; Simon Trent; Tzu-Ching E Lin; Yateen Patel; Jenny Carter; Niels Haan; Robert C Honey; Trevor Humby; Yaniv Assaf; Michael J Owen; David E J Linden; Jeremy Hall; Lawrence S Wilkinson
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 14.919

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.