Literature DB >> 23572578

Default perception of high-speed motion.

Mark Wexler1, Andrew Glennerster, Patrick Cavanagh, Hiroyuki Ito, Takeharu Seno.   

Abstract

When human observers are exposed to even slight motion signals followed by brief visual transients--stimuli containing no detectable coherent motion signals--they perceive large and salient illusory jumps. This visually striking effect, which we call "high phi," challenges well-entrenched assumptions about the perception of motion, namely the minimal-motion principle and the breakdown of coherent motion perception with steps above an upper limit called dmax. Our experiments with transients, such as texture randomization or contrast reversal, show that the magnitude of the jump depends on spatial frequency and transient duration--but not on the speed of the inducing motion signals--and the direction of the jump depends on the duration of the inducer. Jump magnitude is robust across jump directions and different types of transient. In addition, when a texture is actually displaced by a large step beyond the upper step size limit of dmax, a breakdown of coherent motion perception is expected; however, in the presence of an inducer, observers again perceive coherent displacements at or just above dmax. In summary, across a large variety of stimuli, we find that when incoherent motion noise is preceded by a small bias, instead of perceiving little or no motion--as suggested by the minimal-motion principle--observers perceive jumps whose amplitude closely follows their own dmax limits.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23572578      PMCID: PMC3637700          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1213997110

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  22 in total

1.  Coherent global motion in the absence of coherent velocity signals.

Authors:  J Ross; D R Badcock; A Hayes
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2000-06-01       Impact factor: 10.834

2.  Marker correspondence, not processing latency, determines temporal binding of visual attributes.

Authors:  Shin'ya Nishida; Alan Johnston
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2002-03-05       Impact factor: 10.834

3.  Self-motion and the perception of stationary objects.

Authors:  M Wexler; F Panerai; I Lamouret; J Droulez
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-01-04       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Motion illusions as optimal percepts.

Authors:  Yair Weiss; Eero P Simoncelli; Edward H Adelson
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 24.884

5.  Speed skills: measuring the visual speed analyzing properties of primate MT neurons.

Authors:  J A Perrone; A Thiele
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 24.884

6.  Perceptual manifestations of fast neural plasticity: motion priming, rapid motion aftereffect and perceptual sensitization.

Authors:  Ryota Kanai; Frans A J Verstraten
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2005-07-14       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Probing visual motion signals with a priming paradigm.

Authors:  A Pinkus; A Pantle
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  A direct demonstration of perceptual asynchrony in vision.

Authors:  K Moutoussis; S Zeki
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  1997-03-22       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Motion aftereffect with flickering test patterns reveals higher stages of motion processing.

Authors:  S Nishida; T Sato
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 1.886

10.  Motion extrapolation in catching.

Authors:  R Nijhawan
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1994-07-28       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  9 in total

1.  Persistent states in vision break universality and time invariance.

Authors:  Mark Wexler; Marianne Duyck; Pascal Mamassian
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-11-16       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  Motion Extrapolation in Visual Processing: Lessons from 25 Years of Flash-Lag Debate.

Authors:  Hinze Hogendoorn
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-07-22       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Visuospatial Working Memory as a Fundamental Component of the Eye Movement System.

Authors:  Stefan Van der Stigchel; Andrew Hollingworth
Journal:  Curr Dir Psychol Sci       Date:  2018-03-20

4.  Time course of spatiotopic updating across saccades.

Authors:  Jasper H Fabius; Alessio Fracasso; Tanja C W Nijboer; Stefan Van der Stigchel
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-01-17       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Motion extrapolation in the High-Phi illusion: Analogous but dissociable effects on perceived position and perceived motion.

Authors:  Philippa Johnson; Sidney Davies; Hinze Hogendoorn
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2020-12-02       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  Visual Perception of Heading in the Syndrome of Oculopalatal Tremor.

Authors:  Sinem Balta Beylergil; Aasef G Shaikh
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2021-10       Impact factor: 3.847

7.  Ocular-following responses to white noise stimuli in humans reveal a novel nonlinearity that results from temporal sampling.

Authors:  Boris M Sheliga; Christian Quaia; Edmond J FitzGibbon; Bruce G Cumming
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 2.240

8.  Spatiotopic updating facilitates perception immediately after saccades.

Authors:  Jasper H Fabius; Alessio Fracasso; Stefan Van der Stigchel
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-09-30       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 9.  A review of interactions between peripheral and foveal vision.

Authors:  Emma E M Stewart; Matteo Valsecchi; Alexander C Schütz
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2020-11-02       Impact factor: 2.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.