Literature DB >> 23572220

TEP under general anesthesia is superior to Lichtenstein under local anesthesia in terms of pain 6 weeks after surgery: results from a randomized clinical trial.

Ursula Dahlstrand1, Gabriel Sandblom, Mikael Ljungdahl, Staffan Wollert, Ulf Gunnarsson.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Persistent pain is common after inguinal hernia repair. The methods of surgery and anesthesia influence the risk. Local anesthesia and laparoscopic procedures reduce the risk for postoperative pain in different time perspectives. The aim of this study was to compare open Lichtenstein repair under local anesthesia (LLA) with laparoscopic total extraperitoneal repair (TEP) with respect to postoperative pain.
METHODS: Between 2006 and 2010, a total of 389 men with a unilateral primary groin hernia were randomized, in an open-label study, to either TEP (n = 194) or LLA (n = 195). One patient in the TEP group and four in the LLA group were excluded due to protocol violation. Details about the procedure and patient and hernia characteristics were registered. Patients completed the Inguinal Pain Questionnaire (IPQ) 6 weeks after surgery. [The study is registered in ClinicalTrials.gov (No. NCT01020058)].
RESULTS: A total of 378 (98.4 %) patients completed the IPQ. One hundred forty-eight patients (39.1 %) reported some degree of pain, 22 of whom had pain that affected concentration during daily activities. Men in the TEP group had less risk for pain affecting daily activities (6/191 vs. 16/187; odds ratio [OR] 0.35; 95 % CI 0.13-0.91; p = 0.025). Pain prevented participation in sporting activities less frequently after TEP (4.2 vs. 15.5 %; OR 0.24; 95 % CI 0.09-0.56; p < 0.001). Twenty-nine patients (7.7 %) reported sick leave exceeding 1 week due to groin pain, with no difference between the treatment groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients who underwent the laparoscopic TEP procedure suffered less pain 6 weeks after inguinal hernia repair than those who underwent LLA. Groin pain affected the LLA patients' ability to perform strenuous activities such as sports more than TEP patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23572220     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-013-2936-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  30 in total

Review 1.  Postherniorrhaphy urinary retention--effect of local, regional, and general anesthesia: a review.

Authors:  Peter Jensen; Trine Mikkelsen; Henrik Kehlet
Journal:  Reg Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2002 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 6.288

2.  Tension-free inguinal hernia repair: TEP versus mesh-plug versus Lichtenstein: a prospective randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Sven Bringman; Stig Ramel; Timo-Jaakko Heikkinen; Tord Englund; Bo Westman; Bo Anderberg
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Five-year follow-up of patients undergoing laparoscopic or open groin hernia repair: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  David Wright; Caron Paterson; Neil Scott; Alan Hair; Patrick J O'Dwyer
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Long-term cost-minimization analysis comparing laparoscopic with open (Lichtenstein) inguinal hernia repair.

Authors:  A Eklund; P Carlsson; A Rosenblad; A Montgomery; L Bergkvist; C Rudberg
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 6.939

5.  Short-term results of a randomized clinical trial comparing Lichtenstein open repair with totally extraperitoneal laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair.

Authors:  A Eklund; C Rudberg; S Smedberg; L K Enander; C E Leijonmarck; J Osterberg; A Montgomery
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 6.939

6.  Open mesh versus laparoscopic mesh repair of inguinal hernia.

Authors:  Leigh Neumayer; Anita Giobbie-Hurder; Olga Jonasson; Robert Fitzgibbons; Dorothy Dunlop; James Gibbs; Domenic Reda; William Henderson
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-04-25       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  European Hernia Society guidelines on the treatment of inguinal hernia in adult patients.

Authors:  M P Simons; T Aufenacker; M Bay-Nielsen; J L Bouillot; G Campanelli; J Conze; D de Lange; R Fortelny; T Heikkinen; A Kingsnorth; J Kukleta; S Morales-Conde; P Nordin; V Schumpelick; S Smedberg; M Smietanski; G Weber; M Miserez
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2009-07-28       Impact factor: 4.739

Review 8.  Open mesh versus non-mesh for repair of femoral and inguinal hernia.

Authors:  N W Scott; K McCormack; P Graham; P M Go; S J Ross; A M Grant
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2002

9.  Local anesthesia for inguinal hernia repair step-by-step procedure.

Authors:  P K Amid; A G Shulman; I L Lichtenstein
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Long-term results of a randomized clinical trial of Shouldice, Lichtenstein and transabdominal preperitoneal hernia repairs.

Authors:  M Butters; J Redecke; J Köninger
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 6.939

View more
  9 in total

1.  Laparoscopic total extraperitoneal hernia repair under regional anesthesia: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Ioannis Baloyiannis; Konstantinos Perivoliotis; Chamaidi Sarakatsianou; George Tzovaras
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-02-05       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  Open versus laparoscopic mesh repair of primary unilateral uncomplicated inguinal hernia: a systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis.

Authors:  N L Bullen; L H Massey; S A Antoniou; N J Smart; R H Fortelny
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2019-06-03       Impact factor: 4.739

3.  Primary inguinal hernia: systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis comparing open, laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal, totally extraperitoneal, and robotic preperitoneal repair.

Authors:  A Aiolfi; M Cavalli; G Micheletto; F Lombardo; G Bonitta; A Morlacchi; P G Bruni; G Campanelli; D Bona
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2019-05-14       Impact factor: 4.739

Review 4.  Varying convalescence recommendations after inguinal hernia repair: a systematic scoping review.

Authors:  S Harmankaya; S Öberg; J Rosenberg
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2022-06-29       Impact factor: 2.920

Review 5.  Results from patient-reported outcome measures are inconsistently reported in inguinal hernia trials: a systematic review.

Authors:  A Gram-Hanssen; C Christophersen; J Rosenberg
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2021-09-04       Impact factor: 2.920

6.  International guidelines for groin hernia management.

Authors: 
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2018-01-12       Impact factor: 4.739

7.  Correlation analysis between the magnetic resonance imaging characteristics of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures and the efficacy of percutaneous vertebroplasty: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Wei Xu; Silian Wang; Chao Chen; Yifan Li; Yunhan Ji; Xiaodong Zhu; Zhikun Li
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2018-04-12       Impact factor: 2.362

8.  TEP for elective primary unilateral inguinal hernia repair in men: what do we know?

Authors:  F Köckerling
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2019-05-06       Impact factor: 4.739

9.  Quadratus Lumborum Block As A Single Anesthetic Method For Laparoscopic Totally Extraperitoneal (Tep) Inguinal Hernia Repair: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Murillo de Lima Favaro; Silvio Gabor; Diogo Barros Florenzano Souza; Anderson Alcoforado Araújo; Ana Luiza Castro Milani; Marcelo Augusto Fontenelle Ribeiro Junior
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-05-22       Impact factor: 4.379

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.