Literature DB >> 17443855

Long-term results of a randomized clinical trial of Shouldice, Lichtenstein and transabdominal preperitoneal hernia repairs.

M Butters1, J Redecke, J Köninger.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: There is an ongoing debate about the preferred technique for inguinal hernia repair. In this randomized study the long-term results of Shouldice, Lichtenstein and transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) hernia repair were compared.
METHODS: Some 280 men with a primary hernia were randomized prospectively to undergo Shouldice, tension-free Lichtenstein or laparoscopic TAPP repair. Patients were examined after 52 months to assess hernia recurrence, nerve damage, testicular atrophy and patient satisfaction.
RESULTS: Hernia recurrence occurred in six patients after Shouldice repair, and in one patient each after Lichtenstein and TAPP repairs. All recurrences after tension-free repairs were diagnosed within the first year after surgery. Nerve injuries were significantly more frequent after open Shouldice and Lichtenstein repairs. Patient satisfaction was greatest after laparoscopic TAPP repair.
CONCLUSION: Tension-free repair was superior to the non-mesh Shouldice technique. The open anterior approach to the groin was associated with demonstrable nerve injury, and laparoscopic TAPP repair was the most effective approach in the hands of an experienced surgeon.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17443855     DOI: 10.1002/bjs.5733

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Surg        ISSN: 0007-1323            Impact factor:   6.939


  49 in total

Review 1.  Inguinal hernia repair: current surgical techniques.

Authors:  R Bittner; J Schwarz
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2011-11-25       Impact factor: 3.445

2.  Outcomes and impact of laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair versus open inguinal hernia repair on healthcare spending and employee absenteeism.

Authors:  Gurteshwar Rana; Priscila Rodrigues Armijo; Shariq Khan; Nathan Bills; Marsha Morien; Jianying Zhang; Dmitry Oleynikov
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-05-28       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 3.  Inguinal hernias.

Authors:  John T Jenkins; Patrick J O'Dwyer
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2008-02-02

Review 4.  Inguinal hernia.

Authors:  Sanjay Purkayastha; Andre Chow; Thanos Athanasiou; Paris Tekkis; Ara Darzi
Journal:  BMJ Clin Evid       Date:  2008-07-16

5.  Do we follow evidence-based medicine recommendations during inguinal hernia surgery? Results of a survey covering 2441 hernia repairs in 2007.

Authors:  Gerwin A Bernhardt; Peter Kornprat; Herwig Cerwenka; Azab El-Shabrawi; Hans-Jörg Mischinger
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  Current opinion on laparoscopic repair of inguinal hernia.

Authors:  Theodoros E Pavlidis
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-09-19       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Inguinal hernia repair: are the results from a general hospital comparable to those from dedicated hernia centres?

Authors:  Kai Xiong Cheong; Hong Yee Lo; Jun Xiang Andy Neo; Vijayan Appasamy; Ming Terk Chiu
Journal:  Singapore Med J       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 1.858

8.  Laparoscopic extraperitoneal repair versus open inguinal hernia repair: 20-year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  A Barbaro; H Kanhere; J Bessell; G J Maddern
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 4.739

9.  Recurrence of inguinal hernias repaired in a large hernia surgical specialty hospital and general hospitals in Ontario, Canada.

Authors:  Atiqa Malik; Chaim M Bell; Thérèse A Stukel; David R Urbach
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 2.089

Review 10.  Mesh repair of common abdominal hernias: a review on experimental and clinical studies.

Authors:  R Penttinen; J M Grönroos
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2008-03-20       Impact factor: 4.739

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.