Literature DB >> 11882754

Five-year follow-up of patients undergoing laparoscopic or open groin hernia repair: a randomized controlled trial.

David Wright1, Caron Paterson, Neil Scott, Alan Hair, Patrick J O'Dwyer.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare laparoscopic with open hernia repair in a randomized clinical trial at a median follow-up of 5 years. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Follow-up of patients in clinical trials evaluating laparoscopic hernia repair has been short.
METHODS: Of 379 consecutive patients admitted for surgery under the care of one surgeon, 300 were randomized to totally extraperitoneal hernia repair or open repair, with the open operation individualized to the patient's age and hernia type. All patients, both randomized and nonrandomized, were followed up by clinical examination annually by an independent observer.
RESULTS: Recurrence rates were similar for both randomized groups. In 1 of the 79 nonrandomized patients, a recurrent hernia developed. Groin or testicular pain was the most common symptom on follow-up of randomized patients. The most common reason for reoperation was development of a contralateral hernia, which was noted in 9% of patients; 11% of all patients died on follow-up, mainly as a result of cardiovascular disease or cancer.
CONCLUSIONS: These data show a similar outcome for laparoscopic and open hernia repair, and both procedures have a place in managing this common problem.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11882754      PMCID: PMC1422438          DOI: 10.1097/00000658-200203000-00004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  7 in total

Review 1.  Laparoscopic compared with open methods of groin hernia repair: systematic review of randomized controlled trials.

Authors: 
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 6.939

2.  The tension-free hernioplasty.

Authors:  I L Lichtenstein; A G Shulman; P K Amid; M M Montllor
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 2.565

3.  Individualization of hernia repair: a new era.

Authors:  L M Nyhus
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 3.982

4.  Laparoscopic versus open repair of groin hernia: a randomised comparison. The MRC Laparoscopic Groin Hernia Trial Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1999-07-17       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Groin hernia repair in Scotland.

Authors:  A Hair; K Duffy; J McLean; S Taylor; H Smith; A Walker; I M MacIntyre; P J O'Dwyer
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 6.939

6.  Cooperative hernia study. Pain in the postrepair patient.

Authors:  J Cunningham; W J Temple; P Mitchell; J A Nixon; R M Preshaw; N A Hagen
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  The management of certain abdominal herniae by intra-abdominal closure of the neck of the sac. Preliminary communication.

Authors:  R Ger
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1982-09       Impact factor: 1.891

  7 in total
  56 in total

1.  Closer to an ideal solution for inguinal hernia repair: comparison between general surgeons and hernia specialists.

Authors:  A I Gilbert; M F Graham; J Young; B G Patel; K Shaw
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2005-12-23       Impact factor: 4.739

Review 2.  Laparoscopic vs conventional tension free inguinal herniorrhaphy: 2005 society of American Gastrointestinal Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) annual meeting debate.

Authors:  V Puri; E Felix; R J Fitzgibbons
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Recurrence following endoscopic extraperitoneal inguinal hernioplasty.

Authors:  H Lau
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2007-07-03       Impact factor: 4.739

4.  Total Extraperitoneal Hernia Repair: Residency Teaching Program and Outcome Evaluation.

Authors:  Fabio Garofalo; Pau Mota-Moya; Andrew Munday; Sébastien Romy
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  A prospective, randomized comparison of long-term outcomes: chronic groin pain and quality of life following totally extraperitoneal (TEP) and transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair.

Authors:  Virinder Kumar Bansal; Mahesh C Misra; Divya Babu; Jonathan Victor; Subodh Kumar; Rajesh Sagar; S Rajeshwari; Asuri Krishna; Vimi Rewari
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-02-07       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Comparison of endoscopic procedures vs Lichtenstein and other open mesh techniques for inguinal hernia repair: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  C G Schmedt; S Sauerland; R Bittner
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-12-02       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  A modified laparoscopic hernioplasty (TAPP) is the standard procedure for inguinal and femoral hernias: a retrospective 17-year analysis with 1,123 hernia repairs.

Authors:  Werner K J Peitsch
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-09-17       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Predicting chronic post-operative pain following laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair.

Authors:  K J Dickinson; M Thomas; A S Fawole; P J Lyndon; C M White
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2008-07-26       Impact factor: 4.739

9.  Total extra-peritoneal repair of groin hernia: prospective evaluation at a tertiary care center.

Authors:  M C Misra; V K Bansal; S Kumar; B Prashant; H K Bhattacharjee
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2007-09-09       Impact factor: 4.739

10.  Chronic pain after hernia repair: a randomized trial comparing Shouldice, Lichtenstein and TAPP.

Authors:  Jörg Köninger; Jens Redecke; Michael Butters
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2004-07-09       Impact factor: 3.445

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.