Literature DB >> 28413679

Anorectal functional outcome following laparoscopic low anterior resection for rectal cancer.

Li-Guo Liu1, Xue-Bing Yan1, Ze-Zhi Shan1, Lei-Lei Yan1, Chun-Yu Jiang2, Jia Zhou2, Yuan Tian1, Zhi-Ming Jin1.   

Abstract

Low anterior resection (LAR) with total mesorectal excision has been considered a standard treatment for patients with rectal cancer. However, the functional outcome and life quality of laparoscopic LAR (LLAR) in Chinese patients remain unclear. A cohort of 51 Chinese patients (22 men and 29 women) who had undergone LLAR was included in this study. Anorectal manometry combined with the Wexner scores questionnaire were applied to assess functional outcome preoperatively (1 week) and postoperatively (at 3, 6 and 9 months). The validated Chinese versions of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30 and QLQ-CR38 questionnaires were also used to assess the patients' quality of life at the indicated time points. The results demonstrated that the manometric parameters exhibited a temporary decrease at 3 months postoperatively, but a gradual increase at 6 and 9 months, while the Wexner scores exhibited an opposite trend. Furthermore, patients with high anastomoses had significantly higher manometric parameters, a lower frequency of incontinence and lower Wexner scores compared with those with low anastomoses at 9 months (all P<0.05). For the entire cohort, quality of life at 3 months postoperatively was worse compared with the preoperative level, but returned to normal by 9 months. Patients with high anastomoses exhibited significantly better role, emotional and social function, had a better body image and sexual function, fewer problems with defecation and lower frequency of diarrhea, as well as fewer chemotherapy-related side effects at 6 months postoperatively when compared with the low anastomosis group (all P<0.05). In conclusion, LLAR is generally acceptable for Chinese patients with rectal cancer, particularly for those with middle or high rectal cancer, in terms of functional outcome and quality of life.

Entities:  

Keywords:  anorectal function; laparoscopic low anterior resection; manometry; rectal cancer

Year:  2017        PMID: 28413679      PMCID: PMC5374898          DOI: 10.3892/mco.2017.1183

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol        ISSN: 2049-9450


  34 in total

1.  Comparative quality of life in patients following abdominoperineal excision and low anterior resection for low rectal cancer.

Authors:  P How; S Stelzner; G Branagan; K Bundy; K Chandrakumaran; R J Heald; B Moran
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 4.585

2.  Evaluation of two-dimensional intraoperative neuromonitoring for predicting urinary and anorectal function after rectal cancer surgery.

Authors:  D W Kauff; K P Koch; K H Somerlik; K P Hoffmann; H Lang; W Kneist
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2013-02-26       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomised trial.

Authors:  Ruben Veldkamp; Esther Kuhry; Wim C J Hop; J Jeekel; G Kazemier; H Jaap Bonjer; Eva Haglind; Lars Påhlman; Miguel A Cuesta; Simon Msika; Mario Morino; Antonio M Lacy
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 41.316

Review 4.  Quality of life after rectal resection for cancer, with or without permanent colostomy.

Authors:  Jørn Pachler; Peer Wille-Jørgensen
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2012-12-12

5.  Rectal cancer surgery with sphincter preservation: functional results related to the level of anastomosis. Clinical and instrumental study.

Authors:  Chiara Montesani; Annamaria Pronio; Sergio Santella; Arianna Boschetto; Daniele Aguzzi; Roberto Pirozzi; Alberto D'Amato; Annatita Vestri
Journal:  Hepatogastroenterology       Date:  2004 May-Jun

6.  Quality of life in rectal cancer patients: a four-year prospective study.

Authors:  Jutta Engel; Jacqueline Kerr; Anne Schlesinger-Raab; Renate Eckel; Hansjörg Sauer; Dieter Hölzel
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Quality of life after laparoscopic vs open sphincter-preserving resection for rectal cancer.

Authors:  Simon Siu-Man Ng; Wing-Wa Leung; Cherry Yee-Ni Wong; Sophie Sok-Fei Hon; Tony Wing-Chung Mak; Dennis Kwok-Yu Ngo; Janet Fung-Yee Lee
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-08-07       Impact factor: 5.742

8.  Persisting anorectal dysfunction after rectal cancer surgery.

Authors:  A Maris; F Penninckx; A M Devreese; F Staes; P Moons; E Van Cutsem; K Haustermans; A D'Hoore
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 3.788

9.  Outcomes of cancer treatment for technology assessment and cancer treatment guidelines. American Society of Clinical Oncology.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Long term effect of surgery and radiotherapy for colorectal cancer on defecatory function and quality of life.

Authors:  Gillian Knowles; Rachel Haigh; Catriona McLean; Hamish A Phillips; Malcolm G Dunlop; Farhat V N Din
Journal:  Eur J Oncol Nurs       Date:  2013-02-27       Impact factor: 2.398

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.