Literature DB >> 23571081

Human hippocampal increases in low-frequency power during associative prediction violations.

Janice Chen1, Mohammad Dastjerdi, Brett L Foster, Karen F LaRocque, Andreas M Rauschecker, Josef Parvizi, Anthony D Wagner.   

Abstract

Environmental cues often trigger memories of past events (associative retrieval), and these memories are a form of prediction about imminent experience. Learning is driven by the detection of prediction violations, when the past and present diverge. Using intracranial electroencephalography (iEEG), we show that associative prediction violations elicit increased low-frequency power (in the slow-theta range) in human hippocampus, that this low-frequency power increase is modulated by whether conditions allow predictions to be generated, that the increase rapidly onsets after the moment of violation, and that changes in low-frequency power are not present in adjacent perirhinal cortex. These data suggest that associative mismatch is computed within hippocampus when cues trigger predictions that are violated by imminent experience.
© 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Associative memory; Hippocampus; Intracranial EEG; Mismatch; Novelty; Prediction violation

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23571081      PMCID: PMC3805697          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2013.03.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychologia        ISSN: 0028-3932            Impact factor:   3.139


  26 in total

1.  High gamma power is phase-locked to theta oscillations in human neocortex.

Authors:  R T Canolty; E Edwards; S S Dalal; M Soltani; S S Nagarajan; H E Kirsch; M S Berger; N M Barbaro; R T Knight
Journal:  Science       Date:  2006-09-15       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Novelty responses to relational and non-relational information in the hippocampus and the parahippocampal region: a comparison based on event-related fMRI.

Authors:  Stefan Köhler; Stacey Danckert; Joseph S Gati; Ravi S Menon
Journal:  Hippocampus       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 3.899

3.  An unexpected sequence of events: mismatch detection in the human hippocampus.

Authors:  Dharshan Kumaran; Eleanor A Maguire
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 8.029

Review 4.  Which computational mechanisms operate in the hippocampus during novelty detection?

Authors:  Dharshan Kumaran; Eleanor A Maguire
Journal:  Hippocampus       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 3.899

Review 5.  Event-related potentials and recognition memory.

Authors:  Michael D Rugg; Tim Curran
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2007-05-03       Impact factor: 20.229

Review 6.  The hippocampal-VTA loop: controlling the entry of information into long-term memory.

Authors:  John E Lisman; Anthony A Grace
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2005-06-02       Impact factor: 17.173

Review 7.  Free recall and recognition in a network model of the hippocampus: simulating effects of scopolamine on human memory function.

Authors:  M E Hasselmo; B P Wyble
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Phase-locking within human mediotemporal lobe predicts memory formation.

Authors:  Juergen Fell; Eva Ludowig; Timm Rosburg; Nikolai Axmacher; Christian E Elger
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2008-07-22       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 9.  Novelty signals: a window into hippocampal information processing.

Authors:  Dharshan Kumaran; Eleanor A Maguire
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2009-01-08       Impact factor: 20.229

10.  Match mismatch processes underlie human hippocampal responses to associative novelty.

Authors:  Dharshan Kumaran; Eleanor A Maguire
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-08-08       Impact factor: 6.167

View more
  13 in total

1.  Prediction strength modulates responses in human area CA1 to sequence violations.

Authors:  Janice Chen; Paul A Cook; Anthony D Wagner
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-06-10       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Medial Orbitofrontal Cortex, Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex, and Hippocampus Differentially Represent the Event Saliency.

Authors:  Anna Jafarpour; Sandon Griffin; Jack J Lin; Robert T Knight
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2019-03-18       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Direct brain recordings reveal hippocampal rhythm underpinnings of language processing.

Authors:  Vitória Piai; Kristopher L Anderson; Jack J Lin; Callum Dewar; Josef Parvizi; Nina F Dronkers; Robert T Knight
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-09-19       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  The hippocampus is sensitive to the mismatch in novelty between items and their contexts.

Authors:  Preston P Thakral; Sarah S Yu; Michael D Rugg
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2015-01-24       Impact factor: 3.252

5.  Hippocampal theta coordinates memory processing during visual exploration.

Authors:  James E Kragel; Stephen VanHaerents; Jessica W Templer; Stephan Schuele; Joshua M Rosenow; Aneesha S Nilakantan; Donna J Bridge
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-03-13       Impact factor: 8.140

6.  Body representations as indexed by oscillatory EEG activities in the context of tactile novelty processing.

Authors:  Guannan Shen; Andrew N Meltzoff; Peter J Marshall
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2019-07-15       Impact factor: 3.139

7.  The limited role of hippocampal declarative memory in transient semantic activation during online language processing.

Authors:  Sarah Brown-Schmidt; Sun-Joo Cho; Nazbanou Nozari; Nathaniel Klooster; Melissa Duff
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2020-12-18       Impact factor: 3.139

8.  Ventromedial prefrontal cortex drives hippocampal theta oscillations induced by mismatch computations.

Authors:  Marta I Garrido; Gareth R Barnes; Dharshan Kumaran; Eleanor A Maguire; Raymond J Dolan
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  Sequence learning modulates neural responses and oscillatory coupling in human and monkey auditory cortex.

Authors:  Yukiko Kikuchi; Adam Attaheri; Benjamin Wilson; Ariane E Rhone; Kirill V Nourski; Phillip E Gander; Christopher K Kovach; Hiroto Kawasaki; Timothy D Griffiths; Matthew A Howard; Christopher I Petkov
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2017-04-25       Impact factor: 8.029

10.  Attention, in and Out: Scalp-Level and Intracranial EEG Correlates of Interoception and Exteroception.

Authors:  Indira García-Cordero; Sol Esteves; Ezequiel P Mikulan; Eugenia Hesse; Fabricio H Baglivo; Walter Silva; María Del Carmen García; Esteban Vaucheret; Carlos Ciraolo; Hernando S García; Federico Adolfi; Marcos Pietto; Eduar Herrera; Agustina Legaz; Facundo Manes; Adolfo M García; Mariano Sigman; Tristán A Bekinschtein; Agustín Ibáñez; Lucas Sedeño
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2017-07-19       Impact factor: 4.677

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.