OBJECTIVE: This study examined whether a telehealth chronic disease self-management program (CDSMP) would lead to improvements in self-efficacy, health behaviors, and health status for chronically ill adults living in Northern Ontario, Canada. Two telehealth models were used: (1) single site, groups formed by participants at one telehealth site; and (2) multi-site, participants linked from multiple sites to form one telehealth group, as a strategy to increase access to the intervention for individuals living in rural and remote communities. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Two hundred thirteen participants diagnosed with heart disease, stroke, lung disease, or arthritis attended the CDSMP at a preexisting Ontario Telemedicine Network studio from September 2007 to June 2008. The program includes six weekly, peer-facilitated sessions designed to help participants develop important self-management skills to improve their health and quality of life. Baseline and 4-month follow-up surveys were administered to assess self-efficacy beliefs, health behaviors, and health status information. Results were compared between single- and multi-site delivery models. RESULTS: Statistically significant improvements from baseline to 4-month follow-up were found for self-efficacy (6.6±1.8 to 7.0±1.8; p<0.001), exercise behavior, cognitive symptom management, communication with physicians, role function, psychological well-being, energy, health distress, and self-rated health. There were no statistically significant differences in outcomes between single- and multi-site groups. CONCLUSIONS: Improvements in self-efficacy, health status, and health behaviors were equally effective in single- and multi-site groups. Access to self-management programs could be greatly increased with telehealth using single- and multi-site groups in rural and remote communities.
OBJECTIVE: This study examined whether a telehealth chronic disease self-management program (CDSMP) would lead to improvements in self-efficacy, health behaviors, and health status for chronically ill adults living in Northern Ontario, Canada. Two telehealth models were used: (1) single site, groups formed by participants at one telehealth site; and (2) multi-site, participants linked from multiple sites to form one telehealth group, as a strategy to increase access to the intervention for individuals living in rural and remote communities. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Two hundred thirteen participants diagnosed with heart disease, stroke, lung disease, or arthritis attended the CDSMP at a preexisting Ontario Telemedicine Network studio from September 2007 to June 2008. The program includes six weekly, peer-facilitated sessions designed to help participants develop important self-management skills to improve their health and quality of life. Baseline and 4-month follow-up surveys were administered to assess self-efficacy beliefs, health behaviors, and health status information. Results were compared between single- and multi-site delivery models. RESULTS: Statistically significant improvements from baseline to 4-month follow-up were found for self-efficacy (6.6±1.8 to 7.0±1.8; p<0.001), exercise behavior, cognitive symptom management, communication with physicians, role function, psychological well-being, energy, health distress, and self-rated health. There were no statistically significant differences in outcomes between single- and multi-site groups. CONCLUSIONS: Improvements in self-efficacy, health status, and health behaviors were equally effective in single- and multi-site groups. Access to self-management programs could be greatly increased with telehealth using single- and multi-site groups in rural and remote communities.
Authors: K R Lorig; D S Sobel; A L Stewart; B W Brown; A Bandura; P Ritter; V M Gonzalez; D D Laurent; H R Holman Journal: Med Care Date: 1999-01 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: Kelly Warmington; Carol Flewelling; Carol A Kennedy; Rachel Shupak; Angelo Papachristos; Caroline Jones; Denise Linton; Dorcas E Beaton; Sydney Lineker Journal: Open Access Rheumatol Date: 2017-02-24
Authors: Matthew Lee Smith; Caroline D Bergeron; SangNam Ahn; Samuel D Towne; Chivon A Mingo; Kayin T Robinson; Jamarcus Mathis; Lu Meng; Marcia G Ory Journal: Am J Mens Health Date: 2018-01-22
Authors: Cherry Chu; Peter Cram; Andrea Pang; Vess Stamenova; Mina Tadrous; R Sacha Bhatia Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2021-03-24 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: Manon H J Veldman; Hilde P A van der Aa; Christina Bode; Hans Knoop; Carel T J Hulshof; Marc Koopmanschap; Edwin Stavleu; Ger H M B van Rens; Ruth M A van Nispen Journal: Trials Date: 2021-12-28 Impact factor: 2.279
Authors: Susan B Jaglal; Sara J T Guilcher; Gillian Hawker; Wendy Lou; Nancy M Salbach; Michael Manno; Merrick Zwarenstein Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2014-05-01 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: J A Inskip; H Novak Lauscher; L C Li; G A Dumont; A Garde; K Ho; A M Hoens; J D Road; C J Ryerson; P G Camp Journal: Chron Respir Dis Date: 2017-06-01 Impact factor: 2.444