Anthony Jerant1, Monique Moore-Hill, Peter Franks. 1. Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of California Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento, California, USA. afjerant@ucdavis.edu
Abstract
PURPOSE: Studies suggest peer-led self-management training improves chronic illness outcomes by enhancing illness management self-efficacy. Limitations of most studies, however, include use of multiple outcome measures without predesignated primary outcomes and lack of randomized follow-up beyond 6 months. We conducted a 1-year randomized controlled trial of Homing in on Health (HIOH), a Chronic Disease Self-Management Program variant, addressing these limitations. METHODS: We randomized outpatients (N = 415) aged 40 years and older and who had 1 or more of 6 common chronic illnesses, plus functional impairment, to HIOH delivered in homes or by telephone for 6 weeks or to usual care. Primary outcomes were the Medical Outcomes Study 36-ltem short-form health survey's physical component (PCS-36) and mental component (MCS-36) summary scores. Secondary outcomes included the EuroQol EQ-5D and visual analog scale (EQ VAS), hospitalizations, and health care expenditures. RESULTS: Compared with usual care, HIOH delivered in the home led to significantly higher illness management self-efficacy at 6 weeks (effect size = 0.27; 95% CI, 0.10-0.43) and at 6 months (0.17; 95% CI, 0.01-0.33), but not at 1 year. In-home HIOH had no significant effects on PCS-36 or MCS-36 scores and led to improvement in only 1 secondary outcome, the EQ VAS (1-year effect size = 0.40; CI, 0.14-0.66). HIOH delivered by telephone had no significant effects on any outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Despite leading to improvements in self-efficacy comparable to those in other CDSMP studies, in-home HIOH had a limited sustained effect on only 1 secondary health status measure and no effect on utilization. These findings question the cost-effectiveness of peer-led illness self-management training from the health system perspective.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE: Studies suggest peer-led self-management training improves chronic illness outcomes by enhancing illness management self-efficacy. Limitations of most studies, however, include use of multiple outcome measures without predesignated primary outcomes and lack of randomized follow-up beyond 6 months. We conducted a 1-year randomized controlled trial of Homing in on Health (HIOH), a Chronic Disease Self-Management Program variant, addressing these limitations. METHODS: We randomized outpatients (N = 415) aged 40 years and older and who had 1 or more of 6 common chronic illnesses, plus functional impairment, to HIOH delivered in homes or by telephone for 6 weeks or to usual care. Primary outcomes were the Medical Outcomes Study 36-ltem short-form health survey's physical component (PCS-36) and mental component (MCS-36) summary scores. Secondary outcomes included the EuroQol EQ-5D and visual analog scale (EQ VAS), hospitalizations, and health care expenditures. RESULTS: Compared with usual care, HIOH delivered in the home led to significantly higher illness management self-efficacy at 6 weeks (effect size = 0.27; 95% CI, 0.10-0.43) and at 6 months (0.17; 95% CI, 0.01-0.33), but not at 1 year. In-home HIOH had no significant effects on PCS-36 or MCS-36 scores and led to improvement in only 1 secondary outcome, the EQ VAS (1-year effect size = 0.40; CI, 0.14-0.66). HIOH delivered by telephone had no significant effects on any outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Despite leading to improvements in self-efficacy comparable to those in other CDSMP studies, in-home HIOH had a limited sustained effect on only 1 secondary health status measure and no effect on utilization. These findings question the cost-effectiveness of peer-led illness self-management training from the health system perspective.
Authors: Anne Kennedy; David Reeves; Peter Bower; Victoria Lee; Elizabeth Middleton; Gerry Richardson; Caroline Gardner; Claire Gately; Anne Rogers Journal: J Epidemiol Community Health Date: 2007-03 Impact factor: 3.710
Authors: Susan B Jaglal; Vinita A Haroun; Nancy M Salbach; Gillian Hawker; Jennifer Voth; Wendy Lou; Pia Kontos; James E Cameron; Rhonda Cockerill; Tarik Bereket Journal: Telemed J E Health Date: 2013-04-09 Impact factor: 3.536
Authors: Benjamin G Druss; Liping Zhao; Silke A von Esenwein; Joseph R Bona; Larry Fricks; Sherry Jenkins-Tucker; Evelina Sterling; Ralph Diclemente; Kate Lorig Journal: Schizophr Res Date: 2010-02-25 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: Janet L Welch; Kim Schafer Astroth; Susan M Perkins; Cynthia S Johnson; Kay Connelly; Katie A Siek; Josette Jones; Linda LaRue Scott Journal: Res Nurs Health Date: 2013-03-19 Impact factor: 2.228
Authors: Marlies Zwerink; Marjolein Brusse-Keizer; Paul D L P M van der Valk; Gerhard A Zielhuis; Evelyn M Monninkhof; Job van der Palen; Peter A Frith; Tanja Effing Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2014-03-19