Literature DB >> 23569352

Scleral buckling with a noncontact wide-angle viewing system in the management of retinal detachment with undetected retinal break: a case report.

Mihori Kita1, Yukiko Fujii, Naoaki Kawagoe, Sachiyo Hama.   

Abstract

A young patient who showed rhegmatogenous retinal detachment with preoperatively undetected retinal break was successfully treated by scleral buckling using a noncontact wide-angle viewing system.

Entities:  

Keywords:  noncontact wide-angle viewing system; retinal breaks; retinal detachment; scleral buckling

Year:  2013        PMID: 23569352      PMCID: PMC3615845          DOI: 10.2147/OPTH.S42923

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol        ISSN: 1177-5467


Introduction

Traditionally, rhegmatogenous retinal detachments with undetectable breaks have been managed using circumferential buckling and cryopexy of suspicious areas, providing a success rate of 53%–85%.1–5 Recently, the effectiveness of primary pars plana vitrectomy or combined pars plana vitrectomy and scleral buckling procedures has been reported.6–8 It has been reported that endoscope-assisted vitrectomy seems promising in the management of pseudophakic and aphakic retinal detachments with undetected retinal breaks because of the ability to diagnose retinal breaks.9 Here, the case of a young phakic patient who presented showing rhegmatogenous retinal detachment with an undetected retinal break preoperatively and was successfully treated with scleral buckling using a noncontact wide-angle viewing system is reported.

Case presentation

A 16-year-old Japanese boy was referred to the authors’ clinic with retinal detachment of the right eye. At the time of the first visit to the clinic, the best corrected visual acuity was 0.7, with myopia of 9 D in the right eye. Axial length was 26.95 mm. Intraocular pressure was within the normal range. Slit-lamp examination revealed intact anterior segments. Fundus examination showed retinal detachment in the two inferior quadrants associated with multiple lattice degenerations and subretinal strands in the right eye. Despite careful fundus examination, retinal breaks could not be identified. The macula remained attached in the right eye. The patient had no history of trauma or atopy. The patient subsequently underwent repair of the retinal detachment in the right eye with scleral buckling procedure using a noncontact wide-angle viewing system.

Surgical procedures for the right eye

Following conjunctival peritomy 360 degrees around the limbus, four rectus muscles were isolated for encircling buckling. A trocar for a 25-gauge light fiber (Alcon Laboratories, Fort Worth, TX, USA) was placed 4.0 mm behind the limbus at the 8 o’clock position. The noncontact wide-angle viewing system (Resight™; Carl Zeiss Meditec AG, Jena, Germany) was activated after the light fiber was inserted through the trocar and the light was turned on. Dynamic scleral compression with a cryoprobe was performed to identify the retinal breaks. A tiny retinal hole was found at the 4 o’clock position (Figure 1). The retinopexy with cryopexy and diathermy to the break and to the area of lattice degeneration was applied.
Figure 1

Intraoperative view using the wide-angle viewing system.

Note: A tiny retinal break is apparent (arrow).

After the light fiber was pulled off and a plug was inserted into the trocar, the encircling buckling procedure using a silicone tire and belt (numbers 277, 240, and 270; MIRA Inc, Waltham, MA, USA) and external drainage of subretinal fluid through the sclerotomy at the 5 o’clock position were performed under the surgical microscope. The fundus was checked, if necessary, under panoramic view using the noncontact wide-angle viewing system with 25-gauge light fiber during surgery. No intra- or postoperative complications were encountered. At the 6-month follow-up, the retina remained attached, and best corrected visual acuity was 0.9 in the right eye. The lens showed neither subcapsular opacity nor nuclear sclerosis.

Discussion

In rhegmatogenous retinal detachments, one of the prognostic factors for poor surgical outcomes is the inability to detect retinal breaks. Various strategies, including endoscopic-assisted vitrectomy, have been proposed to manage retinal detachments without detected breaks preoperatively.2,3,6–13 Traditionally, scleral buckling has been considered the procedure of choice for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment in young patients. During scleral buckling procedures, visualization of the fundus is performed using an indirect ophthalmoscope. The image is inverted and small, and cannot be readily shared with medical staff, representing a disadvantage for identifying tiny retinal breaks. Recently, use of a wide-angle viewing system in vitrectomy surgery has become popular, as this option can easily provide a panoramic view of the surgical field. Two types of the wide-angle viewing system exist, with both contact and noncontact types available. The noncontact type is more popular because of the stability of the image against the tilt of the eyeball and the ease of manipulation. A few reports demonstrated that simultaneous use of a noncontact wide-angle viewing system combined with light fiber illumination for fundus visualization is also feasible for scleral buckling procedures for retinal detachment with preoperatively detected retinal breaks.14,15 The advantages of this method are that the clear images of the retina are directed through the surgical microscope, and can thus be enlarged and seen even with the small pupil. This allows easier detection of retinal breaks using dynamic scleral compression with a cryoprobe under the wide-angle viewing system. In this system, all procedures of scleral buckling can be performed under surgical microscopy, improving the ease of operation for surgeons with refractive errors, especially presbyopia. Images of the fundus can be shared during retinopexy, which will undoubtedly prove useful in surgical education. Caution should be taken due to the possible risks of surgical complications including vitreous wick from the scleral wound, endophthalmitis, lens damage, and light toxicity. The smaller gauge fiber illumination could be ideal for preventing complications.

Conclusion

Scleral buckling with a noncontact wide-angle viewing system seems promising for the management of rhegmatogenous retinal detachments, not only with preoperatively detected retinal breaks but also those with undetected retinal breaks.
  14 in total

1.  Scleral buckling with a non-contact wide-angle viewing system.

Authors:  Cengiz Aras; Didar Ucar; Arif Koytak; Huseyin Yetik
Journal:  Ophthalmologica       Date:  2011-11-10       Impact factor: 3.250

2.  RETINAL DETACHMENT IN APHAKIA.

Authors:  E W NORTON
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1964-07       Impact factor: 5.258

3.  Indentation microsurgery: internal searching for retinal breaks.

Authors:  P H Rosen; H C Wong; D McLeod
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 3.775

4.  Combined scleral buckle and pars plana vitrectomy as a primary procedure for pseudophakic retinal detachments.

Authors:  R G Devenyi; H de Carvalho Nakamura
Journal:  Ophthalmic Surg Lasers       Date:  1999 Sep-Oct

5.  Pars plana vitrectomy for retinal detachment with unseen retinal holes.

Authors:  D Wong; B M Billington; A H Chignell
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 3.117

6.  Retinal detachment. 360 degree scleral buckling as a primary procedure.

Authors:  V G Criswick; R J Brockhurst
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1969-11

7.  Primary retinal detachments without apparent breaks.

Authors:  R D Griffith; E A Ryan; G F Hilton
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1976-04       Impact factor: 5.258

8.  Management of retinal detachment when no break is found.

Authors:  Alberto Salicone; William E Smiddy; Anna Venkatraman; William Feuer
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2006-01-10       Impact factor: 12.079

9.  Identification of retinal breaks using subretinal trypan blue injection.

Authors:  Timothy L Jackson; Anthony S L Kwan; Alistair H Laidlaw; William Aylward
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2006-11-21       Impact factor: 12.079

10.  A multivariate analysis of anatomic success of retinal detachments treated with scleral buckling.

Authors:  W S Grizzard; G F Hilton; M E Hammer; D Taren
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 3.117

View more
  20 in total

1.  Preventing condensation of objective lens in noncontact wide-angle viewing systems during vitrectomy.

Authors:  Jung Pil Lee; Jinsoo Kim; Inwon Park; Ho Ra; Soonil Kwon
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-11-18       Impact factor: 1.779

2.  Comparison of scleral buckling using wide-angle viewing systems and indirect ophthalmoscope for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment.

Authors:  Xiu-Juan Li; Xiao-Peng Yang; Xiao-Bei Lyu
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-09-18       Impact factor: 1.779

3.  Scleral buckling procedure with chandelier illumination for pediatric rhegmatogenous retinal detachment.

Authors:  Toshiyuki Yokoyama; Koki Kanbayashi; Tamaki Yamaguchi
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-01-23

Review 4.  Vitreoretinal instruments: vitrectomy cutters, endoillumination and wide-angle viewing systems.

Authors:  Paulo Ricardo Chaves de Oliveira; Alan Richard Berger; David Robert Chow
Journal:  Int J Retina Vitreous       Date:  2016-12-05

5.  Scleral Buckling Using a Non-contact Wide-Angle Viewing System with a 25-Gauge Chandelier Endoilluminator.

Authors:  Jaehyuck Jo; Byung Gil Moon; Joo Yong Lee
Journal:  Korean J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-12

6.  Acute bacterial endophthalmitis after scleral buckling surgery with chandelier endoillumination.

Authors:  Takato Sakono; Hiroki Otsuka; Hideki Shiihara; Naoya Yoshihara; Taiji Sakamoto
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol Case Rep       Date:  2017-07-21

7.  Wide-Angle Viewing System versus Conventional Indirect Ophthalmoscopy for Scleral Buckling.

Authors:  Yohei Tomita; Toshihide Kurihara; Atsuro Uchida; Norihiro Nagai; Hajime Shinoda; Kazuo Tsubota; Yoko Ozawa
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Scleral buckling for primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment using noncontact wide-angle viewing system with a cannula-based 25 G chandelier endoilluminator.

Authors:  Hisanori Imai; Mizuki Tagami; Atsushi Azumi
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-11-11

Review 9.  Scleral Buckling with Chandelier Illumination.

Authors:  Michael I Seider; Riikka E K Nomides; Paul Hahn; Prithvi Mruthyunjaya; Tamer H Mahmoud
Journal:  J Ophthalmic Vis Res       Date:  2016 Jul-Sep

10.  Applying Sutureless Encircling Number 41 Band and Transscleral Chandelier-Assisted Laser Retinopexy for Scleral Buckling Procedure.

Authors:  Amir Ramadan Gomaa; Samir Mohamed Elbaha
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-11-30       Impact factor: 1.909

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.