Literature DB >> 23568112

Assessment of postoperative pain: Contributing factors to the differences between patients and doctors.

S Sakura1, T Nonoue, T Nomura, T Nakatani.   

Abstract

This study was undertaken to compare the assessment of pain intensity by 50 patients and by their doctors according to a visual analog scale 5 h and 20 h after major abdominal surgery, and to examine the relationships between the differences in rating of patients and doctors and the factors inherent in the patients which include preoperative expectation of pain, level of anxiety, and the surgical history of the patient. The ratings given by the patients were significantly higher than those given by the doctors at both time periods. However, the correlation between the ratings given by the two was low:r=0.31 andr s=0.27 at 5 h after the operations, andr=0.58 andr s=0.49 at 20 h. The results of analysis using Hayashi's quantification theory Type II indicated a moderate association between the rating difference and the patient's age, surgical history, preoperative state of anxiety, and expectation of pain. It is concluded that postoperative pain management, whether in clinical practice or in research, necessitates more consideration of the several above-mentioned individual factors and a preoperative interview in which the patient's level of anxiety and the amount of information the patient has concerning the surgery and post-operative pain is clearly assessed.

Entities:  

Year:  1994        PMID: 23568112     DOI: 10.1007/BF02514650

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anesth        ISSN: 0913-8668            Impact factor:   2.078


  14 in total

1.  Anxiety and pain in surgical patients.

Authors:  A Martinez-Urrutia
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  1975-08

2.  Differences in the assessment of postoperative pain when evaluated by patients and doctors.

Authors:  S Sakura; T Nonoue; T Nomura; K Hara; H Iwakura; Y Kosaka
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 2.078

3.  The reliability of a linear analogue for evaluating pain.

Authors:  S I Revill; J O Robinson; M Rosen; M I Hogg
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  1976-11       Impact factor: 6.955

4.  Pain tolerance: differences according to age, sex and race.

Authors:  K M Woodrow; G D Friedman; A B Siegelaub; M F Collen
Journal:  Psychosom Med       Date:  1972 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.312

5.  An approach to the measurement of the pain and anxiety responses of surgical patients.

Authors:  F L Drew; R W Moriarty; A P Shapiro
Journal:  Psychosom Med       Date:  1968 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.312

6.  Adverse cognitive effects of general anaesthesia in young and elderly patients.

Authors:  R J Smith; N M Roberts; R J Rodgers; S Bennett
Journal:  Int Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  1986-07       Impact factor: 1.659

7.  Preoperative predictors of postoperative pain.

Authors:  L E Scott; G A Clum; J B Peoples
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1983-03       Impact factor: 6.961

8.  Measurement of pain: patient preference does not confound pain measurement.

Authors:  E Kremer; J H Atkinson; R J Ignelzi
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1981-04       Impact factor: 6.961

9.  REDUCTION OF POSTOPERATIVE PAIN BY ENCOURAGEMENT AND INSTRUCTION OF PATIENTS. A STUDY OF DOCTOR-PATIENT RAPPORT.

Authors:  L D EGBERT; G E BATTIT; C E WELCH; M K BARTLETT
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1964-04-16       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Postthoracotomy pain and pulmonary function following epidural and systemic morphine.

Authors:  M Shulman; A N Sandler; J W Bradley; P S Young; J Brebner
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1984-11       Impact factor: 7.892

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.