Literature DB >> 23560979

Comparing simulations of lipid bilayers to scattering data: the GROMOS 43A1-S3 force field.

Anthony R Braun1, Jonathan N Sachs, John F Nagle.   

Abstract

Simulations of DOPC at T = 303 K were performed using the united atom force field 43A1-S3 at six fixed projected areas, A(P) = 62, 64, 66, 68, 70, and 72 Å(2), as well as a tensionless simulation that produced an average A(NPT) = 65.8 Å(2). After a small undulation correction for the system size consisting of 288 lipids, results were compared to experimental data. The best, and excellent, fit to neutron scattering data occurs at an interpolated A(N) = 66.6 Å(2) and the best, but not as good, fit to the more extensive X-ray scattering data occurs at A(X) = 68.7 Å(2). The distance ΔDB-H between the Gibbs dividing surface for water and the peak in the electron density profile agrees with scattering experiments. The calculated area compressibility K(A) = 277 ± 10 mN/m is in excellent agreement with the micromechanical experiment. The volume per lipid V(L) is smaller than volume experiments which suggests a workaround that raises all the areas by about 1.5%. Although A(X) ≠ A(N) ≠ A(NPT), this force field obtains acceptable agreement with experiment for A(L) = 67.5 Å(2) (68.5 Å(2) in the workaround), which we suggest is a better DOPC result from 43A1-S3 simulations than its value from the tensionless NPT simulation. However, nonsimulation modeling obtains better simultaneous fits to both kinds of scattering data, which suggests that the force fields can still be improved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23560979      PMCID: PMC3673311          DOI: 10.1021/jp401718k

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Phys Chem B        ISSN: 1520-5207            Impact factor:   2.991


  43 in total

1.  Back to the future: mechanics and thermodynamics of lipid biomembranes.

Authors:  E Evans; W Rawicz; B A Smith
Journal:  Faraday Discuss       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 4.008

2.  Undulation contributions to the area compressibility in lipid bilayer simulations.

Authors:  Qaiser Waheed; Olle Edholm
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2009-11-18       Impact factor: 4.033

3.  Interpretation of fluctuation spectra in lipid bilayer simulations.

Authors:  Erik G Brandt; Anthony R Braun; Jonathan N Sachs; John F Nagle; Olle Edholm
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2011-05-04       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  Introductory lecture: basic quantities in model biomembranes.

Authors:  John F Nagle
Journal:  Faraday Discuss       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 4.008

5.  Comparing membrane simulations to scattering experiments: introducing the SIMtoEXP software.

Authors:  Norbert Kucerka; John Katsaras; John F Nagle
Journal:  J Membr Biol       Date:  2010-04-21       Impact factor: 1.843

6.  MDAnalysis: a toolkit for the analysis of molecular dynamics simulations.

Authors:  Naveen Michaud-Agrawal; Elizabeth J Denning; Thomas B Woolf; Oliver Beckstein
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2011-04-15       Impact factor: 3.376

7.  Effect of chain length and unsaturation on elasticity of lipid bilayers.

Authors:  W Rawicz; K C Olbrich; T McIntosh; D Needham; E Evans
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 4.033

8.  Structure and elasticity of lipid membranes with genistein and daidzein bioflavinoids using X-ray scattering and MD simulations.

Authors:  Mohit Raghunathan; Yuriy Zubovski; Richard M Venable; Richard W Pastor; John F Nagle; Stephanie Tristram-Nagle
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2012-02-29       Impact factor: 2.991

9.  Interpretation of small angle X-ray measurements guided by molecular dynamics simulations of lipid bilayers.

Authors:  Jonathan N Sachs; Horia I Petrache; Thomas B Woolf
Journal:  Chem Phys Lipids       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 3.329

10.  Derivation and systematic validation of a refined all-atom force field for phosphatidylcholine lipids.

Authors:  Joakim P M Jämbeck; Alexander P Lyubartsev
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2012-03-01       Impact factor: 2.991

View more
  7 in total

1.  Revisiting Volumes of Lipid Components in Bilayers.

Authors:  John F Nagle; Richard M Venable; Ezekiel Maroclo-Kemmerling; Stephanie Tristram-Nagle; Paul E Harper; Richard W Pastor
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2019-03-18       Impact factor: 2.991

2.  The Role of Cholesterol in Driving IAPP-Membrane Interactions.

Authors:  Michele F M Sciacca; Fabio Lolicato; Giacomo Di Mauro; Danilo Milardi; Luisa D'Urso; Cristina Satriano; Ayyalusamy Ramamoorthy; Carmelo La Rosa
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2016-07-12       Impact factor: 4.033

3.  What are the true values of the bending modulus of simple lipid bilayers?

Authors:  John F Nagle; Michael S Jablin; Stephanie Tristram-Nagle; Kiyotaka Akabori
Journal:  Chem Phys Lipids       Date:  2014-04-16       Impact factor: 3.329

Review 4.  Structural Significance of Lipid Diversity as Studied by Small Angle Neutron and X-ray Scattering.

Authors:  Norbert Kučerka; Frederick A Heberle; Jianjun Pan; John Katsaras
Journal:  Membranes (Basel)       Date:  2015-09-21

5.  Bending Modulus of Lipid Membranes from Density Correlation Functions.

Authors:  Jose Hernández-Muñoz; Fernando Bresme; Pedro Tarazona; Enrique Chacón
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2022-04-07       Impact factor: 6.578

6.  Lipid14: The Amber Lipid Force Field.

Authors:  Callum J Dickson; Benjamin D Madej; Age A Skjevik; Robin M Betz; Knut Teigen; Ian R Gould; Ross C Walker
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2014-01-30       Impact factor: 6.006

7.  Determining Structural and Mechanical Properties from Molecular Dynamics Simulations of Lipid Vesicles.

Authors:  Anthony R Braun; Jonathan N Sachs
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2014-08-06       Impact factor: 6.006

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.