| Literature DB >> 23560070 |
Jian-Li Zhao1, Lu Zhang, Selvadurai Dayanandan, Shivaprakash Nagaraju, Dong-Mei Liu, Qiao-Ming Li.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The origin of extraordinarily rich biodiversity in tropical forests is often attributed to evolution under stable climatic conditions over a long period or to climatic fluctuations during the recent Quaternary period. Here, we test these two hypotheses using Dracaena cambodiana, a plant species distributed in paleotropical forests.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23560070 PMCID: PMC3613351 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0060102
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Figure 1Geographic distribution and evolutionary relationships of 18 cpDNA haplotypes in Dracaena cambodiana.
a: Different colors in pies charts represent haplotypes. The dashed lines indicate the division of fifteen populations into four groups based upon their geographic location. Black triangles represent main geographical barriers originated during the Tertiary era (modified from Lacassin et al., 1993; Huchon et al.,1994; Searle, 2006). b: Colorsrepresent populations. The black dots are the missing haplotypes or missing samples. The numbers on the branches represent number of mutations between two connected haplotypes. The gray connected lines among haplotypes were resolved based on the methods of Crandall & Templeton (1993). Segmented-elliptic-dashed lines represent the cluster of S-I populations. Straight-dashed line is the connection to outgroups. The detailed connections of outgroups is given in Figure S2. c: general position of map A in Southeast Asia. d: The trend of altitudes shifting along latitudes.
Sampling information of Dracaena cambodiana for cpDNA and nuclear microsatellite (nSSR) analyses.
| Code | Population | Latitude (N)/Longitude (E) | Altitude (m) | N cpDNA/nSSR | cpDNAhaplotypes (no. of individuals) | |
|
|
| |||||
| QM | Chiang Mai, Thailand | 15°50′/100°12′ | 220 | 7/− | H6(7) | |
| TL | Ubon, Thailand | 14°45/104°38′ | 150 | 4/28 | H14(1), H15(2), | |
| BA | Batdambang, Cambodia | 13°04′/103°11′ | 110 | 10/28 |
| |
| KP | Kampot, Cambodia | 10°47′/104°19′ | 250 | 10/28 | H17(8), H18(2) | |
|
|
| |||||
| PX | Pingxiang, Guangxi Province, China | 22°05′/106°45′ | 320 | 10/24 | H7(10) | |
| JC | Jingxi, Guangxi Province, China | 22°58′/106°21′ | 800 | 9/24 |
| |
| HF | Haiphong, Vietnam | 20°57′/106°57′ | 120 | 9/30 |
| |
| PM | Pumat National Park, Vietnam | 19°45′/105°19′ | 330 | 6/− | H12(3), H13(3) | |
|
|
| |||||
| JG | Jinggu, Yunnan Province, China | 23°06′/100°35′ | 1100 | 10/23 |
| |
| ML | Menglian, Yunnan Province, China | 22°20′/99°34′ | 1000 | 9/42 |
| |
| NX | Zhenkang, Yunnan Province, China | 23°30′/98°54′ | 1300 | 11/30 |
| |
| MM | Mengyuan, Yunnan Province, China | 21°42′/101°22′ | 800 | 17/30 | H4(17) | |
| LA | LouangPhrabang,Laos | 20°27′/101°49′ | 817 | 9/31 |
| |
|
|
| |||||
| DF | Dongfang, Hainan Province, China | 19°00′/108°49′ | 450 | 10/24 | H10(10) | |
| SY | Sanya, Hainan Province, China | 18°17′/109°09′ | 200 | 9/21 |
| |
| Overall | – | – |
| H1-18 (140) | ||
The shared haplotypes are indicated in .
(−) = no individuals were available for nuclear microsatellite analysis.
Genetic diversity and phylogeographic structure estimated from cpDNA and nSSR data of Dracaena cambodiana.
| Group | cpDNA | nSSR | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| S-I | 0.297 | 0.958 | 0.772 | 0.86 | 0.690 | 0.807 | 0.580 | 0.856 | 0.343 | 0.321 | 0.080 |
| NE-I | 0.289 | 0.963 | 0.784 | 1.35 | 0.700 | 0.732 | 0.706 | 0.890 | 0.298 | 0.438 | 0.011 |
| N-I | 0.081 | 0.739 | 0.643 | 0.72 | 0.891 | 0.817 | 0.678 | 0.919 | 0.324 | 0.406 | 0.047 |
| HN | – | – | 0.573 | 0.63 | – | – | 0.474 | 0.747 | 0.395 | 0.701 | 0.170 |
| Overall | 0.198 | 0.968 | 0.911 | 1.81 | 0.796 | 0.876* | 0.637 | 0.948 | 0.329 | 0.449* | 0.050 |
Genetic diversity for each loci and each population was summarize in Table S3 and Table S4.
H S, genetic diversity within populations; H O, observed heterozygosity; H E, expected heterozygosity; H T, total genetic diversity; h, haplotype diversity; π, nucleotide diversity; G ST, N ST, F ST-SSR and R ST, genetic differentiation for and phylogeographic signal test; *, N ST>G ST, F ST-SSR>R ST; P<0.05, means significant phylogeographic structure; F IS, inbreeding coefficient; -, Populations that are smaller than two cannot be analyzed in the PERMUTCPSSR program.
Results of Analysis of Molecular Variance (AMOVA, cpDNA/nSSR) of Dracaena cambodiana.
| Source of variation | d.f. | Sum of squares | Variance components | Percentage of variation | Fixation Indices |
| Among groups | 3/3 | 15.94/125.78 | 0.05/0.002 | 10.39/0.10 |
|
| Among populations within groups | 11/9 | 38.10/392.27 | 0.37/0.75 | 74.62/32.22 |
|
| Within populations | 125/350 | 9.26/549.79 | 0.07/0.01 | 15.00/0.22 |
|
| Within individuals | −/363 | −/566.50 | −/1.56 | −/67.46 |
P<0.05;
for cpDNA, Nm = 0.5 (1–F ST)/F ST, for microsatellite, Nm = 0.25 (1–F ST)/F ST (Wright 1931; Wright 1965).
Figure 2Results of Bayesian model based clustering of individuals using the STRUCTURE program.
a) Distribution of likelihood value LnP(D) and the distribution of model parameter DeltaK (ΔK). All estimated values are based on 20 replicates and values of LnP(D)(±SD) and ΔK are plotted against its corresponding K. b) Barplots showing the results of the Bayesian cluster analysis. The colour in each barplot represents the probability of each individual to belong to an admixture group. Populations are ordered based on their population IDs as given in Table1.
Figure 3The Phylogenetic tree representing evolutionary relationships of four geographically based groups of Dracaena cambodiana populations.
The coalescent times of the most recent common ancestor (T TMRCA) for overall populations and each group (A, B, C, D) based on IMa2 (★)and BEAST (♦) analyses. The divergence times among the four geographic groups are T0 T1 and T2. Dashed lines corresponds to T TMRCA. The 95% highest posterior density intervals (95%HPD) are given in parentheses. The unit time is in million years ago (Ma).
Figure 4Population demographics of Dracaena cambodiana.
a: mismatch distribution. dashed lines are observed and black lines are expected values. b (change in population size over time) and c (divergence of lineages): x-axis is the median time in millions years ago (Ma); black lines represent median estimate and gray lines represent 95% confidence intervals.
The neutrality tests and mismatch distribution analysis within four groups and overall populations of Dracaena cambodiana.
| Group | SSD | HRag | Tajima's | Fu's |
| S-I | 0.079 |
| 0.679 | −1.169 |
| NE-I |
|
| 0.751 | 0.420 |
| N-I | 0.026 | 0.101 | −0.003 | −0.941 |
| HN | 0.132 | 0.483 | 0.875 | 1.473 |
| Overall |
|
| 0.549 | −2.597 |
Tajima's D and Fu's F and their significance values are reported. The sum of squared deviation (SSD) and raggedness index (HRag) are for testing the sudden expansion model. The bolds indicate P<0.05.