Literature DB >> 23559195

Validity of the 3D VECTRA photogrammetric surface imaging system for cranio-maxillofacial anthropometric measurements.

Philipp Metzler1, Yi Sun, Wolfgang Zemann, Alexander Bartella, Marc Lehner, Joachim Anton Obwegeser, Astrid L Kruse-Gujer, Heinz-Theo Lübbers.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The use of three-dimensional (3D) photography for anthropometric measurements is of increasing interest, especially in the cranio-maxillofacial field. Before standard implementation, accurate determination of the precision and accuracy of each system is mandatory.
METHODS: A mannequin head was labelled with 52 landmarks, and 28 three-dimensional images were taken using a commercially available five-pod 3D photosystem (3D VECTRA; Canfield, Fairfield, NJ) in different head positions. Distances between the landmarks were measured manually using a conventional calliper and compared with the digitally calculated distances acquired from labelling by two independent observers. The experimental set-up accounted for clinical circumstances by varying the positioning (vertical, horizontal, sagittal) of the phantom.
RESULTS: In the entire calliper measurement data set (n = 410), a significant difference (p = 0.02) between the directly measured and corresponding virtually calculated distances was found. The mean aberration between both modalities covering all data was 7.96 mm. No differences (p = 0.94) between the two groups were found using a cut-off of 10 % (leaving n = 369 distances) due to considerable errors in direct measurements and the necessary manual data translation. The mean diversity of both measurement modalities after cut-off was 1.33 mm (maximum, 6.70 mm). Inter-observer analysis of all 1,326 distances showed no difference (p = 0.99; maximal difference, 0.58 mm) in the digital measurements.
CONCLUSION: The precision and accuracy of this five-pod 3D photosystem suggests its suitability for clinical applications, particularly anthropometric studies. Three-hundred-and-sixty degree surface-contour mapping of the craniofacial region within milliseconds is particularly useful in paediatric patients. Proper patient positioning is essential for high-quality imaging.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23559195     DOI: 10.1007/s10006-013-0404-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 1865-1550


  30 in total

1.  A stereo-photogrammetric method to measure the facial dysmorphology of children in the diagnosis of fetal alcohol syndrome.

Authors:  E M Meintjes; T S Douglas; F Martinez; C L Vaughan; L P Adams; A Stekhoven; D Viljoen
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 2.242

2.  Anthropometric precision and accuracy of digital three-dimensional photogrammetry: comparing the Genex and 3dMD imaging systems with one another and with direct anthropometry.

Authors:  Seth M Weinberg; Sybill Naidoo; Daniel P Govier; Rick A Martin; Alex A Kane; Mary L Marazita
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 1.046

3.  Validation of a three-dimensional facial scanning system based on structured light techniques.

Authors:  Lili Ma; Tianmin Xu; Jiuxiang Lin
Journal:  Comput Methods Programs Biomed       Date:  2009-03-20       Impact factor: 5.428

4.  Craniofacial disproportions in Apert's syndrome: an anthropometric study.

Authors:  L G Farkas; J C Kolar; I R Munro
Journal:  Cleft Palate J       Date:  1985-10

5.  A novel anthropometric chart for craniofacial surgery.

Authors:  Efthimios Andreas Christofides; Mark Eugene Steinmann
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 1.046

6.  Value and reliability of anthropometric measurements of cranial deformity in early childhood.

Authors:  Jan-Falco Wilbrand; Martina Wilbrand; Joern Pons-Kuehnemann; Joerg-Christoph Blecher; Petros Christophis; Hans-Peter Howaldt; Heidrun Schaaf
Journal:  J Craniomaxillofac Surg       Date:  2010-04-24       Impact factor: 2.078

7.  Validity and reliability of craniofacial anthropometric measurement of 3D digital photogrammetric images.

Authors:  Julielynn Y Wong; Albert K Oh; Eiichi Ohta; Anne T Hunt; Gary F Rogers; John B Mulliken; Curtis K Deutsch
Journal:  Cleft Palate Craniofac J       Date:  2008-05

8.  Single sutural craniosynostoses: surgical outcomes and long-term growth.

Authors:  Jeffrey A Fearon; Rachel A Ruotolo; John C Kolar
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 4.730

9.  Postoperative cranial vault growth in premature sagittal craniosynostosis.

Authors:  Philipp Metzler; Wolfgang Zemann; Christine Jacobsen; Klaus Wilhelm Grätz; Joachim Anton Obwegeser
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 1.046

10.  The Reliability of a Three-Dimensional Photo System- (3dMDface-) Based Evaluation of the Face in Cleft Lip Infants.

Authors:  Rebecca Ort; Philipp Metzler; Astrid L Kruse; Felix Matthews; Wolfgang Zemann; Klaus W Grätz; Heinz-Theo Luebbers
Journal:  Plast Surg Int       Date:  2012-08-05
View more
  17 in total

1.  Reliability of periocular anthropometry using three-dimensional digital stereophotogrammetry.

Authors:  Yongwei Guo; Alexander C Rokohl; Friederike Schaub; Xiaoyi Hou; Jinhua Liu; Yue Ruan; Renbing Jia; Konrad R Koch; Ludwig M Heindl
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-08-12       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  Airflow Considerations and the Effect of Webster's Triangle in Reduction Rhinoplasty.

Authors:  Haldun O Kamburoglu; Ozan Bitik; İbrahim Vargel
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  2021-02-17       Impact factor: 2.326

3.  A portable mirror stand for clinical facial photo documentation.

Authors:  Laureen Supit; Theddeus Oh Prasetyono
Journal:  Arch Plast Surg       Date:  2015-05-14

4.  Three-dimensional facial scanner in the hands of patients: validation of a novel application on iPad/iPhone for three-dimensional imaging.

Authors:  Yuming Chong; Xinyu Liu; Mai Shi; Jiuzuo Huang; Nanze Yu; Xiao Long
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2021-07

5.  Precision and accuracy assessment of single and multicamera three-dimensional photogrammetry compared with direct anthropometry.

Authors:  Sable Staller; Justina Anigbo; Kelton Stewart; Vinicius Dutra; Hakan Turkkahraman
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2022-05-27       Impact factor: 2.684

6.  Reproducibility of Novel Soft-Tissue Landmarks on Three-Dimensional Human Facial Scan Images in Caucasian and Asian.

Authors:  Zhouxiao Li; Riccardo Enzo Giunta; Konstantin Frank; Thilo Ludwig Schenck; Konstantin Christoph Koban
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  2021-10-26       Impact factor: 2.708

7.  Expanding the Classic Facial Canons: Quantifying Intercanthal Distance in a Diverse Patient Population.

Authors:  Gabriel Bouhadana; Jordan Gornitsky; Eli Saleh; Nadia Oliveira Trabelsi; Daniel E Borsuk
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2022-04-22

8.  A novel standardized distraction test to evaluate lower eyelid tension using three-dimensional stereophotogrammetry.

Authors:  Xiaoyi Hou; Alexander C Rokohl; Marius M Meinke; Senmao Li; Jinhua Liu; Wanlin Fan; Ming Lin; Renbing Jia; Yongwei Guo; Ludwig M Heindl
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2021-08

9.  Three-dimensional facial analysis of Chinese children with repaired unilateral cleft lip and palate.

Authors:  Siti Adibah Othman; Noor Airin Aidil Koay
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-08-10       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Three-dimensional Nasolabial Morphologic Alterations Following Le Fort I.

Authors:  Christopher R DeSesa; Philip Metzler; Rajendra Sawh-Martinez; Derek M Steinbacher
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2016-08-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.