Literature DB >> 23558282

Predictive value of S-100β protein for prognosis in patients with moderate and severe traumatic brain injury: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Eric Mercier1, Amélie Boutin, François Lauzier, Dean A Fergusson, Jean-François Simard, Ryan Zarychanski, Lynne Moore, Lauralyn A McIntyre, Patrick Archambault, François Lamontagne, France Légaré, Edward Randell, Linda Nadeau, François Rousseau, Alexis F Turgeon.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To determine the ability and accuracy of the S-100β protein in predicting prognosis after a moderate or severe traumatic brain injury.
DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials and observational studies. DATA SOURCES: Medline, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, BIOSIS (from their inception to April 2012), conference abstracts, bibliographies of eligible articles, and relevant narrative reviews. STUDY SELECTION: Two reviewers independently reviewed citations and selected eligible studies, defined as cohort studies or randomised control trials including patients with moderate or severe traumatic brain injury and evaluating the prognostic value of S-100β protein. Outcomes evaluated were mortality, score on the Glasgow outcome scale, or brain death. DATA EXTRACTION: Two independent reviewers extracted data using a standardised form and evaluated the methodological quality of included studies. Pooled results were presented with geometric means ratios and analysed with random effect models. Prespecified sensitivity analyses were performed to explain heterogeneity.
RESULTS: The search strategy yielded 9228 citations. Two randomised controlled trials and 39 cohort studies were considered eligible (1862 patients). Most studies (n=23) considered Glasgow outcome score ≤ 3 as an unfavourable outcome. All studies reported at least one measurement of S-100β within 24 hours after traumatic brain injury. There was a significant positive association between S-100β protein concentrations and mortality (12 studies: geometric mean ratio 2.55, 95% confidence interval 2.02 to 3.21, I(2)=56%) and score ≤ 3 (18 studies: 2.62, 2.01 to 3.42, I(2)=79%). Sensitivity analysis based on sampling time, sampling type, blinding of outcome assessors, and timing of outcome assessment yielded similar results. Thresholds for serum S-100β protein values with 100% specificity ranged from 1.38 to 10.50 µg/L for mortality (six studies) and from 2.16 to 14.00 µg/L for unfavourable neurological prognosis as defined by the Glasgow outcome score.
CONCLUSIONS: After moderate or severe traumatic brain injury, serum S-100β protein concentrations are significantly associated with unfavourable prognosis in the short, mid, or long term. Optimal thresholds for discrimination remain unclear. Measuring the S-100β protein could be useful in evaluating the severity of traumatic brain injury and in the determination of long term prognosis in patients with moderate and severe injury.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23558282     DOI: 10.1136/bmj.f1757

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ        ISSN: 0959-8138


  37 in total

1.  Comparison of the effect of minocycline and simvastatin on functional recovery and gene expression in a rat traumatic brain injury model.

Authors:  Cole Vonder Haar; Gail D Anderson; Brandy E Elmore; Lynn H Moore; Amanda M Wright; Eric D Kantor; Fred M Farin; Theo K Bammler; James W MacDonald; Michael R Hoane
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2014-01-20       Impact factor: 5.269

2.  S100B and its association with HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders.

Authors:  Nath Limpruttidham; Brooks I Mitchell; Kalpana J Kallianpur; Beau K Nakamoto; Scott A Souza; Bruce Shiramizu; Lishomwa C Ndhlovu; Dominic C Chow; Cecilia M Shikuma
Journal:  J Neurovirol       Date:  2019-07-05       Impact factor: 2.643

3.  Letter to the Editor.

Authors:  Mahsa Abassi; Ned Sacktor
Journal:  J Neurovirol       Date:  2019-07-05       Impact factor: 2.643

Review 4.  Moderate Traumatic Brain Injury: The Grey Zone of Neurotrauma.

Authors:  Daniel Agustín Godoy; Andrés Rubiano; Alejandro A Rabinstein; Ross Bullock; Juan Sahuquillo
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 3.210

5.  Predictive value of neuron-specific enolase for prognosis in patients with moderate or severe traumatic brain injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Eric Mercier; Amélie Boutin; Michèle Shemilt; François Lauzier; Ryan Zarychanski; Dean A Fergusson; Lynne Moore; Lauralyn A McIntyre; Patrick Archambault; France Légaré; François Rousseau; François Lamontagne; Linda Nadeau; Alexis F Turgeon
Journal:  CMAJ Open       Date:  2016-07-22

Review 6.  White matter damage after traumatic brain injury: A role for damage associated molecular patterns.

Authors:  Molly Braun; Kumar Vaibhav; Nancy M Saad; Sumbul Fatima; John R Vender; Babak Baban; Md Nasrul Hoda; Krishnan M Dhandapani
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Basis Dis       Date:  2017-05-19       Impact factor: 5.187

7.  Inflammation and Outcome in Traumatic Brain Injury: Does Gender Effect on Survival and Prognosis?

Authors:  Taraneh Naghibi; Mina Mohajeri; Faramarz Dobakhti
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2017-02-01

8.  Evaluation of eight plasma proteins as candidate blood-based biomarkers for malignant gliomas.

Authors:  Ryan P Lange; Allen Everett; Pratima Dulloor; Frederick K Korley; Chetan Bettegowda; Cherie Blair; Stuart A Grossman; Matthias Holdhoff
Journal:  Cancer Invest       Date:  2014-07-14       Impact factor: 2.176

Review 9.  Development of prognostic models for patients with traumatic brain injury: a systematic review.

Authors:  Jinxi Gao; Zhaocong Zheng
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-11-15

Review 10.  Chronic cerebrovascular dysfunction after traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Amandine Jullienne; Andre Obenaus; Aleksandra Ichkova; Catherine Savona-Baron; William J Pearce; Jerome Badaut
Journal:  J Neurosci Res       Date:  2016-04-27       Impact factor: 4.164

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.