| Literature DB >> 26927279 |
Daniel Agustín Godoy1, Andrés Rubiano2, Alejandro A Rabinstein3, Ross Bullock4, Juan Sahuquillo5.
Abstract
Moderate traumatic brain injury (MTBI) is poorly defined in the literature and the nomenclature "moderate" is misleading, because up to 15 % of such patients may die. MTBI is a heterogeneous entity that shares many aspects of its pathophysiology and management with severe traumatic brain injury. Many patients who ''talk and died'' are MTBI. The role of neuroimaging is essential for the proper management of these patients. To analyze all aspects of the pathophysiology and management of MTBI, proposing a new way to categorize it considering the clinical picture and neuroimaging findings. We proposed a different approach to the group of patients with Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) ranging from 9 through 13 and we discuss the rationale for this proposal. Patients with lower GCS scores (9-10), especially those with significant space-occupying lesions on the CT scan, should be managed following the guidelines for severe traumatic brain injury, with ICU observation, frequent serial computed tomography (CT) scanning and ICP monitoring. On the other hand, those with higher range GCS (11-13) can be managed more conservatively with serial neurological examination and CT scans. Given the available evidence, MTBI is an entity that needs reclassification. Large-scale and well-designed studies are urgently needed.Entities:
Keywords: Categorization; Cerebral contusions; Glasgow coma scale; Moderate TBI; Talk and died
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26927279 DOI: 10.1007/s12028-016-0253-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Neurocrit Care ISSN: 1541-6933 Impact factor: 3.210