Literature DB >> 23558095

Confounds in multivariate pattern analysis: Theory and rule representation case study.

Michael T Todd1, Leigh E Nystrom, Jonathan D Cohen.   

Abstract

Multivariate pattern analysis (MVPA) is a relatively recent innovation in functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) methods. MVPA is increasingly widely used, as it is apparently more effective than classical general linear model analysis (GLMA) for detecting response patterns or representations that are distributed at a fine spatial scale. However, we demonstrate that widely used approaches to MVPA can systematically admit certain confounds that are appropriately eliminated by GLMA. Thus confounds rather than distributed representations may explain some cases in which MVPA produced positive results but GLMA did not. The issue is that it is common practice in MVPA to conduct group tests on single-subject summary statistics that discard the sign or direction of underlying effects, whereas GLMA group tests are conducted directly on single-subject effects themselves. We describe how this common MVPA practice undermines standard experiment design logic that is intended to control at the group level for certain types of confounds, such as time on task and individual differences. Furthermore, we note that a simple application of linear regression can restore experimental control when using MVPA in many situations. Finally, we present a case study with novel fMRI data in the domain of rule representations, or flexible stimulus-response mappings, which has seen several recent MVPA publications. In our new dataset, as with recent reports, standard MVPA appears to reveal rule representations in prefrontal cortex regions, whereas GLMA produces null results. However, controlling for a variable that is confounded with rule at the individual-subject level but not the group level (reaction time differences across rules) eliminates the MVPA results. This raises the question of whether recently reported results truly reflect rule representations, or rather the effects of confounds such as reaction time, difficulty, or other variables of no interest.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23558095     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.03.039

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  72 in total

1.  Feature-based face representations and image reconstruction from behavioral and neural data.

Authors:  Adrian Nestor; David C Plaut; Marlene Behrmann
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-12-28       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Neural representation of emotion regulation goals.

Authors:  Carmen Morawetz; Stefan Bode; Juergen Baudewig; Arthur M Jacobs; Hauke R Heekeren
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2015-11-05       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  The Role of the Parietal Cortex in the Representation of Task-Reward Associations.

Authors:  David Wisniewski; Carlo Reverberi; Ida Momennejad; Thorsten Kahnt; John-Dylan Haynes
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-09-09       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  The Behavioral Relevance of Task Information in Human Prefrontal Cortex.

Authors:  Michael W Cole; Takuya Ito; Todd S Braver
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2015-04-13       Impact factor: 5.357

5.  The influence of low-level stimulus features on the representation of contexts, items, and their mnemonic associations.

Authors:  Derek J Huffman; Craig E L Stark
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2017-04-08       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  What do differences between multi-voxel and univariate analysis mean? How subject-, voxel-, and trial-level variance impact fMRI analysis.

Authors:  Tyler Davis; Karen F LaRocque; Jeanette A Mumford; Kenneth A Norman; Anthony D Wagner; Russell A Poldrack
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2014-04-21       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  Distinct neural mechanisms for body form and body motion discriminations.

Authors:  Joris Vangeneugden; Marius V Peelen; Duje Tadin; Lorella Battelli
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-01-08       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 8.  Neural overlap in processing music and speech.

Authors:  Isabelle Peretz; Dominique Vuvan; Marie-Élaine Lagrois; Jorge L Armony
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2015-03-19       Impact factor: 6.237

9.  Decoding the content of recollection within the core recollection network and beyond.

Authors:  Preston P Thakral; Tracy H Wang; Michael D Rugg
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2016-12-22       Impact factor: 4.027

Review 10.  Revisiting the role of persistent neural activity during working memory.

Authors:  Kartik K Sreenivasan; Clayton E Curtis; Mark D'Esposito
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2014-01-14       Impact factor: 20.229

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.