Literature DB >> 28400264

The influence of low-level stimulus features on the representation of contexts, items, and their mnemonic associations.

Derek J Huffman1, Craig E L Stark2.   

Abstract

Since the earliest attempts to characterize the "receptive fields" of neurons, a central aim of many neuroscience experiments is to elucidate the information that is represented in various regions of the brain. Recent studies suggest that, in the service of memory, information is represented in the medial temporal lobe in a conjunctive or associative form with the contextual aspects of the experience being the primary factor or highest level of the conjunctive hierarchy. A critical question is whether the information that has been observed in these studies reflects notions such as a cognitive representation of context or whether the information reflects the low-level sensory differences between stimuli. We performed two functional magnetic resonance imaging experiments to address this question and we found that associative representations observed between context and item (and order) in the human brain can be highly influenced by low-level sensory differences between stimuli. Our results place clear constraints on the experimental design of studies that aim to investigate the representation of contexts and items during performance of associative memory tasks. Moreover, our results raise interesting theoretical questions regarding the disambiguation of memory-related representations from processing-related representations.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Associative memory; Fine-grained semantic representations; Medial temporal lobe (MTL); Perirhinal cortex (PRC); Retrosplenial cortex; confound

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28400264      PMCID: PMC5511560          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.04.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  109 in total

1.  Functional magnetic resonance imaging activity during the gradual acquisition and expression of paired-associate memory.

Authors:  Jon R Law; Marci A Flanery; Sylvia Wirth; Marianna Yanike; Anne C Smith; Loren M Frank; Wendy A Suzuki; Emery N Brown; Craig E L Stark
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2005-06-15       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Continuous carry-over designs for fMRI.

Authors:  Geoffrey Karl Aguirre
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2007-02-15       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Thinking outside the box: rectilinear shapes selectively activate scene-selective cortex.

Authors:  Shahin Nasr; Cesar E Echavarria; Roger B H Tootell
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-05-14       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Cortical representations are reinstated by the hippocampus during memory retrieval.

Authors:  Kazumasa Z Tanaka; Aleksandr Pevzner; Anahita B Hamidi; Yuki Nakazawa; Jalina Graham; Brian J Wiltgen
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2014-10-09       Impact factor: 17.173

5.  Automatic parcellation of human cortical gyri and sulci using standard anatomical nomenclature.

Authors:  Christophe Destrieux; Bruce Fischl; Anders Dale; Eric Halgren
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2010-06-12       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 6.  Hierarchical organization of cognitive memory.

Authors:  M Mishkin; W A Suzuki; D G Gadian; F Vargha-Khadem
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1997-10-29       Impact factor: 6.237

7.  A cardinal orientation bias in scene-selective visual cortex.

Authors:  Shahin Nasr; Roger B H Tootell
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-10-24       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Hippocampal representation of related and opposing memories develop within distinct, hierarchically organized neural schemas.

Authors:  Sam McKenzie; Andrea J Frank; Nathaniel R Kinsky; Blake Porter; Pamela D Rivière; Howard Eichenbaum
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2014-06-05       Impact factor: 17.173

9.  Accurate prediction of V1 location from cortical folds in a surface coordinate system.

Authors:  Oliver P Hinds; Niranjini Rajendran; Jonathan R Polimeni; Jean C Augustinack; Graham Wiggins; Lawrence L Wald; H Diana Rosas; Andreas Potthast; Eric L Schwartz; Bruce Fischl
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2007-11-06       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  Representational similarity analysis - connecting the branches of systems neuroscience.

Authors:  Nikolaus Kriegeskorte; Marieke Mur; Peter Bandettini
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2008-11-24
View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  A Closer Look at the Hippocampus and Memory.

Authors:  Joel L Voss; Donna J Bridge; Neal J Cohen; John A Walker
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2017-06-15       Impact factor: 20.229

Review 2.  Interacting networks of brain regions underlie human spatial navigation: a review and novel synthesis of the literature.

Authors:  Arne D Ekstrom; Derek J Huffman; Michael Starrett
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-09-20       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 3.  What's in a context? Cautions, limitations, and potential paths forward.

Authors:  Shauna M Stark; Zachariah M Reagh; Michael A Yassa; Craig E L Stark
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2017-05-18       Impact factor: 3.046

4.  Different types of associative encoding evoke differential processing in both younger and older adults: Evidence from univariate and multivariate analyses.

Authors:  Nancy A Dennis; Amy A Overman; Courtney R Gerver; Kayla E McGraw; M Andrew Rowley; Joanna M Salerno
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2019-11-02       Impact factor: 3.139

5.  A Modality-Independent Network Underlies the Retrieval of Large-Scale Spatial Environments in the Human Brain.

Authors:  Derek J Huffman; Arne D Ekstrom
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2019-09-17       Impact factor: 17.173

6.  Acute stress-induced cortisol elevation during memory consolidation enhances pattern separation.

Authors:  Alice Jiang; Tammy T Tran; Farrah N Madison; Arnold Bakker
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2019-03-21       Impact factor: 2.460

7.  Increasing stimulus similarity drives nonmonotonic representational change in hippocampus.

Authors:  Jeffrey Wammes; Kenneth A Norman; Nicholas Turk-Browne
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2022-01-06       Impact factor: 8.140

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.