Literature DB >> 23557881

Specific aspects of cognitive and language proficiency account for variability in neural indices of semantic and syntactic processing in children.

Amanda Hampton Wray1, Christine Weber-Fox.   

Abstract

The neural activity mediating language processing in young children is characterized by large individual variability that is likely related in part to individual strengths and weakness across various cognitive abilities. The current study addresses the following question: How does proficiency in specific cognitive and language functions impact neural indices mediating language processing in children? Thirty typically developing seven- and eight-year-olds were divided into high-normal and low-normal proficiency groups based on performance on nonverbal IQ, auditory word recall, and grammatical morphology tests. Event-related brain potentials (ERPs) were elicited by semantic anomalies and phrase structure violations in naturally spoken sentences. The proficiency for each of the specific cognitive and language tasks uniquely contributed to specific aspects (e.g., timing and/or resource allocation) of neural indices underlying semantic (N400) and syntactic (P600) processing. These results suggest that distinct aptitudes within broader domains of cognition and language, even within the normal range, influence the neural signatures of semantic and syntactic processing. Furthermore, the current findings have important implications for the design and interpretation of developmental studies of ERPs indexing language processing, and they highlight the need to take into account cognitive abilities both within and outside the classic language domain.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23557881      PMCID: PMC3676731          DOI: 10.1016/j.dcn.2013.03.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dev Cogn Neurosci        ISSN: 1878-9293            Impact factor:   6.464


  42 in total

1.  Electrophysiology reveals semantic memory use in language comprehension.

Authors: 
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2000-12-01       Impact factor: 20.229

2.  Young children learning Spanish make rapid use of grammatical gender in spoken word recognition.

Authors:  Casey Lew-Williams; Anne Fernald
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2007-03

3.  Event-related brain potentials suggest a late interaction of meter and syntax in the P600.

Authors:  Maren Schmidt-Kassow; Sonja A Kotz
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Processing syntactic relations in language and music: an event-related potential study.

Authors:  A D Patel; E Gibson; J Ratner; M Besson; P J Holcomb
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Syntax, concepts, and logic in the temporal dynamics of language comprehension: evidence from event-related potentials.

Authors:  Karsten Steinhauer; John E Drury; Paul Portner; Matthew Walenski; Michael T Ullman
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2010-02-04       Impact factor: 3.139

6.  Working memory constraints on syntactic ambiguity resolution as revealed by electrical brain responses.

Authors:  A D Friederici; K Steinhauer; A Mecklinger; M Meyer
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 3.251

7.  Semantic priming and stimulus degradation: implications for the role of the N400 in language processing.

Authors:  P J Holcomb
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 4.016

8.  Brain potentials during reading reflect word expectancy and semantic association.

Authors:  M Kutas; S A Hillyard
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1984 Jan 12-18       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Reading senseless sentences: brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity.

Authors:  M Kutas; S A Hillyard
Journal:  Science       Date:  1980-01-11       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Differences in the neural mechanisms of selective attention in children from different socioeconomic backgrounds: an event-related brain potential study.

Authors:  Courtney Stevens; Brittni Lauinger; Helen Neville
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2009-07
View more
  8 in total

1.  Decreased sensitivity to long-distance dependencies in children with a history of specific language impairment: electrophysiological evidence.

Authors:  J D Purdy; Laurence B Leonard; Christine Weber-Fox; Natalya Kaganovich
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2014-06-01       Impact factor: 2.297

2.  Neural Processes Underlying Nonword Rhyme Differentiate Eventual Stuttering Persistence and Recovery.

Authors:  Amanda Hampton Wray; Gregory Spray
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2020-07-27       Impact factor: 2.297

3.  Neural Indices of Semantic Processing in Early Childhood Distinguish Eventual Stuttering Persistence and Recovery.

Authors:  Kathryn Kreidler; Amanda Hampton Wray; Evan Usler; Christine Weber
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2017-11-09       Impact factor: 2.297

Review 4.  How Stuttering Develops: The Multifactorial Dynamic Pathways Theory.

Authors:  Anne Smith; Christine Weber
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2017-09-18       Impact factor: 2.297

5.  Processing of audiovisually congruent and incongruent speech in school-age children with a history of specific language impairment: a behavioral and event-related potentials study.

Authors:  Natalya Kaganovich; Jennifer Schumaker; Danielle Macias; Dana Gustafson
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2014-11-29

6.  Early childhood stuttering and electrophysiological indices of language processing.

Authors:  Christine Weber-Fox; Amanda Hampton Wray; Hayley Arnold
Journal:  J Fluency Disord       Date:  2013-01-20       Impact factor: 2.538

7.  Neurodevelopment for syntactic processing distinguishes childhood stuttering recovery versus persistence.

Authors:  Evan Usler; Christine Weber-Fox
Journal:  J Neurodev Disord       Date:  2015-01-20       Impact factor: 4.025

8.  Endogenous Oscillations Time-Constrain Linguistic Segmentation: Cycling the Garden Path.

Authors:  Lena Henke; Lars Meyer
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2021-07-29       Impact factor: 5.357

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.