Literature DB >> 18855546

Event-related brain potentials suggest a late interaction of meter and syntax in the P600.

Maren Schmidt-Kassow1, Sonja A Kotz.   

Abstract

Many studies refer to the relevance of metric cues in speech segmentation during language acquisition and adult language processing. However, the on-line use (i.e., time-locking the unfolding of a sentence to EEG) of metric stress patterns that are manifested by the succession of stressed and unstressed syllables during auditory syntactic processing has not been investigated. This is surprising as both processes rely on abstract rules that allow the building up of expectancies of which element will occur next and at which point in time. Participants listened to metrically regular sentences that could either be correct, syntactically incorrect, metrically incorrect, or doubly incorrect. They either judged syntactic correctness or metric homogeneity in two different sessions. We provide first event-related potential evidence that the metric structure of a given language is processed in two stages as evidenced in a biphasic pattern of an early frontal negativity and a late posterior positivity. This pattern is comparable to the biphasic pattern reported in syntactic processing. However, metric cues are processed earlier than syntactic cues during the first stage (LAN), whereas both processes seem to interact at a later integrational stage (P600). The present results substantiate the important impact of metric cues during auditory syntactic language processing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 18855546     DOI: 10.1162/jocn.2008.21153

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci        ISSN: 0898-929X            Impact factor:   3.225


  25 in total

1.  Aesthetic appreciation of poetry correlates with ease of processing in event-related potentials.

Authors:  Christian Obermeier; Sonja A Kotz; Sarah Jessen; Tim Raettig; Martin von Koppenfels; Winfried Menninghaus
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 3.282

2.  An ERP study on whether the P600 can reflect the presence of unexpected phonology.

Authors:  Baolin Liu; Zhixing Jin; Zhongning Wang; Shuai Xin
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-06-04       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Interactions between distal speech rate, linguistic knowledge, and speech environment.

Authors:  Tuuli Morrill; Melissa Baese-Berk; Christopher Heffner; Laura Dilley
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2015-10

4.  Maturational constraints on the recruitment of early processes for syntactic processing.

Authors:  Eric Pakulak; Helen J Neville
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2010-10-22       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Time for prediction? The effect of presentation rate on predictive sentence comprehension during word-by-word reading.

Authors:  Edward W Wlotko; Kara D Federmeier
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2015-04-01       Impact factor: 4.027

Review 6.  Perspectives on the rhythm-grammar link and its implications for typical and atypical language development.

Authors:  Reyna L Gordon; Magdalene S Jacobs; C Melanie Schuele; J Devin McAuley
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 5.691

7.  Words and melody are intertwined in perception of sung words: EEG and behavioral evidence.

Authors:  Reyna L Gordon; Daniele Schön; Cyrille Magne; Corine Astésano; Mireille Besson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-03-31       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Specific aspects of cognitive and language proficiency account for variability in neural indices of semantic and syntactic processing in children.

Authors:  Amanda Hampton Wray; Christine Weber-Fox
Journal:  Dev Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2013-03-17       Impact factor: 6.464

9.  New evidence of a rhythmic priming effect that enhances grammaticality judgments in children.

Authors:  Alexander Chern; Barbara Tillmann; Chloe Vaughan; Reyna L Gordon
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  2018-05-16

10.  The role of rhythm in perceiving speech in noise: a comparison of percussionists, vocalists and non-musicians.

Authors:  Jessica Slater; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2015-10-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.