Literature DB >> 23557200

Validation of physical activity monitors in individuals with diabetes: energy expenditure estimation by the multisensor SenseWear Armband Pro3 and the step counter Omron HJ-720 against indirect calorimetry during walking.

Stanislav Machač1, Michal Procházka, Jiří Radvanský, Kryštof Slabý.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study is to test the agreement between energy expenditure estimate of the SenseWear(®) Armband Pro3 (SWA) (BodyMedia, Pittsburgh, PA) and the Omron HJ-720 (Omron Healthcare, Kyoto, Japan) step counter with indirect calorimetry (IC) as a gold standard in older individuals with type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus while walking on a treadmill. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: In total, six men (60.3±3.1 years old) and 13 women (51.1±11.0 years old) with type 1 or type 2 diabetes mellitus were included in the study. Each subject performed three 15-min walking sessions with different combinations of speed and incline (3 km/h, 0%; 4 km/h, 0%; 5 km/h, 5%) on a treadmill. Energy expenditure (EE) was simultaneously measured by the SWA, Omron, and IC. Mean over-/underestimation and Pearson's correlation coefficients were used for statistical evaluation of the agreement between tested methods and IC.
RESULTS: At the speed of 3 km/h with 0% incline, mean overestimation of +81.19±23.81% was found for SWA (r=0.79, P<0.001) and +70.51±20.91% for Omron (r=0.77, P<0.001). At the speed of 4 km/h and 0% incline, mean overestimation found for SWA was +78.18±33.96% (r=0.63, P<0.01) and +75.77±33.36% for Omron (r=0.52, P<0.05). At the level of high-intensity exercise at the speed of 5 km/h and 5% incline, mean underestimation was -7.88±16.86% for SWA (r=0.74, P<0.001) and -7.37±16.07% for Omron (r=0.75, P<0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Both methods led to considerable overestimation of calculated EE in level walking and a relatively minor underestimation during fast uphill walking.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23557200      PMCID: PMC3643221          DOI: 10.1089/dia.2012.0235

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther        ISSN: 1520-9156            Impact factor:   6.118


  19 in total

1.  Validity of accelerometry for the assessment of moderate intensity physical activity in the field.

Authors:  D Hendelman; K Miller; C Baggett; E Debold; P Freedson
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 5.411

Review 2.  A review of field techniques for the assessment of energy expenditure.

Authors:  D A Schoeller; S B Racette
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 4.798

3.  2011 Compendium of Physical Activities: a second update of codes and MET values.

Authors:  Barbara E Ainsworth; William L Haskell; Stephen D Herrmann; Nathanael Meckes; David R Bassett; Catrine Tudor-Locke; Jennifer L Greer; Jesse Vezina; Melicia C Whitt-Glover; Arthur S Leon
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 5.411

4.  The validity of two Omron pedometers during treadmill walking is speed dependent.

Authors:  Dimitra M Giannakidou; Antonis Kambas; Nikolaos Ageloussis; Ioannis Fatouros; Christos Christoforidis; Fotini Venetsanou; Ioannis Douroudos; Kyriakos Taxildaris
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2011-04-09       Impact factor: 3.078

5.  Validity of Physical Activity Monitors in Assessing Energy Expenditure in Normal, Overweight, and Obese Adults.

Authors:  Ann M Swartz; Scott J Strath; Nora E Miller; Elizabeth K Grimm; Lauren A Ewalt; Michael S Loy; Keith P Gennuso
Journal:  Open Sports Sci J       Date:  2009

6.  Predicting metabolic energy cost.

Authors:  B Givoni; R F Goldman
Journal:  J Appl Physiol       Date:  1971-03       Impact factor: 3.531

7.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Validity of physical activity monitors in adults participating in free-living activities.

Authors:  S Berntsen; R Hageberg; A Aandstad; P Mowinckel; S A Anderssen; K-H Carlsen; L B Andersen
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2008-07-15       Impact factor: 13.800

9.  Study to determine the criterion validity of the SenseWear Armband as a measure of physical activity in people with rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Marie Tierney; Alexander Fraser; Helen Purtill; Norelee Kennedy
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 4.794

10.  The energetic cost of walking: a comparison of predictive methods.

Authors:  Patricia Ann Kramer; Adam D Sylvester
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-06-22       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  13 in total

1.  Association of Light-Intensity Physical Activity With Lower Cardiovascular Disease Risk Burden in Rheumatoid Arthritis.

Authors:  Samannaaz S Khoja; Gustavo J Almeida; Mary Chester Wasko; Lauren Terhorst; Sara R Piva
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 4.794

2.  The accuracy of the 24-h activity recall method for assessing sedentary behaviour: the physical activity measurement survey (PAMS) project.

Authors:  Youngwon Kim; Gregory J Welk
Journal:  J Sports Sci       Date:  2016-03-28       Impact factor: 3.337

3.  Validity of physical activity measures in individuals after total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Gustavo J Almeida; David M Wert; Kelly S Brower; Sara R Piva
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2014-10-31       Impact factor: 3.966

Review 4.  Validity of Accelerometers for the Evaluation of Energy Expenditure in Obese and Overweight Individuals: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Silvia Pisanu; Andrea Deledda; Andrea Loviselli; Inge Huybrechts; Fernanda Velluzzi
Journal:  J Nutr Metab       Date:  2020-08-04

5.  Inflammatory cytokines in general and central obesity and modulating effects of physical activity.

Authors:  Frank M Schmidt; Julia Weschenfelder; Christian Sander; Juliane Minkwitz; Julia Thormann; Tobias Chittka; Roland Mergl; Kenneth C Kirkby; Mathias Faßhauer; Michael Stumvoll; Lesca M Holdt; Daniel Teupser; Ulrich Hegerl; Hubertus Himmerich
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-17       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 6.  Energy Expenditure in People with Diabetes Mellitus: A Review.

Authors:  Nathan Caron; Nicolas Peyrot; Teddy Caderby; Chantal Verkindt; Georges Dalleau
Journal:  Front Nutr       Date:  2016-12-22

7.  Type 2 diabetes family histories, body composition and fasting glucose levels: a cross-section analysis in healthy sedentary male and female.

Authors:  Antonino Bianco; Francesco Pomara; Ewan Thomas; Antonio Paoli; Giuseppe Battaglia; Marco Petrucci; Patrizia Proia; Marianna Bellafiore; Antonio Palma
Journal:  Iran J Public Health       Date:  2013-07-01       Impact factor: 1.429

8.  Low validity of the Sensewear Pro3 activity monitor compared to indirect calorimetry during simulated free living in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip.

Authors:  Andreas Hermann; Mathias Ried-Larsen; Andreas Kryger Jensen; René Holst; Lars Bo Andersen; Søren Overgaard; Anders Holsgaard-Larsen
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2014-02-19       Impact factor: 2.362

Review 9.  Sensor Monitoring of Physical Activity to Improve Glucose Management in Diabetic Patients: A Review.

Authors:  Sandrine Ding; Michael Schumacher
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2016-04-23       Impact factor: 3.576

10.  Optimal Estimate for Energy Requirements in Adult Patients With the m.3243A>G Mutation in Mitochondrial DNA.

Authors:  Heidi E E Zweers; Mirian C H Janssen; Geert J A Wanten
Journal:  JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr       Date:  2020-08-01       Impact factor: 4.016

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.