| Literature DB >> 24427747 |
Antonino Bianco1, Francesco Pomara2, Ewan Thomas1, Antonio Paoli3, Giuseppe Battaglia1, Marco Petrucci1, Patrizia Proia1, Marianna Bellafiore1, Antonio Palma1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Diabetes type 2 is a world wide spread disease with a multifactorial pathogenetic evolution. Various factors like obesity, physical inactivity and poor lifestyle habits contribute to its development. The aim of this study was to verify if in young healthy sedentary male and female there is positive correlation between family history to type 2 diabetes and an increase in body weight and fat mass, or alterations in basal glycemia values.Entities:
Keywords: Body composition; Family history; Fasting glucose level; Lifestyle; Type 2 diabetes
Year: 2013 PMID: 24427747 PMCID: PMC3881614
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Iran J Public Health ISSN: 2251-6085 Impact factor: 1.429
Anthropometric parameters of male subjects
| Age, years | 34.80 ± 12.03 | 25.50 ± 6.39 | 28.20 ± 10.41 | 0.0005 |
| Height, cm | 172.77 ± 6.57 | 174.27 ± 8.89 | 174.02 ± 6.33 | NS |
| Body weight, kg | 82.96 ± 18.51 | 75.63 ± 12.71 | 77.78 ± 11.58 | NS |
| BMI, kg/m2 | 27.72 ± 5.62 | 24.83 ± 3.20 | 25.67 ± 3.58 | 0.0078 |
| BSA, m2 | 1.96 ± 0.21 | 1.90 ± 0.19 | 1.92 ± 0.15 | NS |
| Shoulder circumference, cm | 113.73 ± 8.53 | 111.73 ± 9.91 | 114.00 ± 9.23 | NS |
| Waist circumferences. cm | 94.21 ± 15.47 | 84.17 ± 10.54 | 86.93 ± 10.47 | 0.0007 |
| Hip circumferences. cm | 95.21 ± 13.42 | 87.34 ± 9.10 | 89.44 ± 9.34 | 0.0360 |
| WHR | 0.99 ± 0.05 | 0.96 ± 0.03 | 0.97 ± 0.04 | 0.0079 |
NS: no significance
Anthropometric parameters of female subjects
| Age, years | 34.25 ± 12.31 | 27.62 ± 9.23 | 32.73 ± 11.71 | 0.0047 |
| Height, cm | 162.28 ± 6.27 | 160.18 ± 6.57 | 159.24 ± 5.09 | NS |
| Body weight, kg | 67.58 ± 14.67 | 61.51 ± 12.82 | 60.75 ± 10.89 | 0.0052 |
| BMI, kg/m2 | 25.77 ± 5.85 | 23.98 ± 4.85 | 23.96 ± 4.14 | NS |
| BSA, m2 | 1.71 ± 0.16 | 1.63 ± 0.16 | 1.62 ± 0.13 | 0.0015 |
| Shoulder circumferences, cm | 100.84 ± 8.87 | 98.02 ± 7.05 | 98.38 ± 6.00 | NS |
| Waist circumferences, cm | 82.82 ± 12.53 | 75.75 ± 10.79 | 77.46 ± 10.47 | 0.0040 |
| Hip circumferences. cm | 96.07 ± 13.57 | 90.55 ± 12.63 | 90.72 ± 11.35 | 0.0296 |
| WHR | 0.86 ± 0.05 | 0.84 ± 0.04 | 0.85 ± 0.05 | NS |
NS: no significance
Body composition (BIA) of male subjects
| H2O, litres | 39.06 ± 8.26 | 37.60 ± 7.50 | 36.95 ± 5.57 | NS |
| FM, % | 29.10 ± 5.41 | 25.46 ± 7.97 | 28.59 ± 5.43 | 0.0191 |
| FFM, % | 70.90 ± 5.41 | 74.54 ± 7.97 | 71.41 ± 5.43 | 0.0191 |
| FM, kg | 24.37 ± 7.83 | 19.23 ± 6.87 | 22.35 ± 5.85 | 0.0052 |
| FFM, kg | 58.59 ± 12.40 | 56.40 ± 11.25 | 55.43 ± 8.36 | NS |
| FFM/FM | 2.63 ± 1.10 | 3.51 ± 1.94 | 2.72 ± 1.20 | 0.0085 |
NS: no significance
Body composition (BIA) of female subjects
| H2O, litres | 28.33 ± 3.48 | 27.33 ± 3.20 | 27.96 ± 3.31 | NS |
| FM, % | 35.28 ± 11.12 | 31.76 ± 9.82 | 29.90 ± 8.32 | 0.0039 |
| FFM, % | 64.72 ± 11.12 | 68.24 ± 9.82 | 70.10 ± 8.32 | 0.0039 |
| FM, kg | 25.08 ± 13.86 | 20.51 ± 11.19 | 18.81 ± 8.49 | 0.0026 |
| FFM, kg | 42.50 ± 5.22 | 40.99 ± 4.80 | 41.94 ± 4.97 | NS |
| FFM/FM | 2.09 ± 0.90 | 2.43 ± 1.00 | 2.60 ± 0.97 | 0.0102 |
NS: no significance
Fasting blood glucose levels of male subject in absolute and relative values
| mg/dl | 73.86 ± 10.14 | 71.72 ± 9.81 | 74.30 ± 9.31 | NS |
| mg/dl · kg BW−1 | 0.93 ± 0.24 | 0.97 ± 0.20 | 0.97 ± 0.18 | NS |
| mg/dl · kg FFM−1 | 1.32 ± 0.36 | 1.33 ± 0.34 | 1.37 ± 0.29 | NS |
| mg/dl · kg FM−1 | 3.36 ± 1.18 | 4.28 ± 1.88 | 3.58 ± 1.08 | 0.0076 |
| mg/dl · kg BSA−1 | 38.15 ± 6.81 | 38.15 ± 6.60 | 38.91 ± 5.59 | NS |
NS: no significance
Fasting blood glucose levels of female subject in absolute and relative values
| mg/dl | 73.61 ± 8.93 | 73.09 ± 8.75 | 75.33 ± 9.29 | |
| mg/dl · kg BW−1 | 1.13 ± 0.23 | 1.24 ± 0.28 | 1.27 ± 0.23 | 0.0046 |
| mg/dl · kg FFM−1 | 1.75 ± 0.29 | 1.81 ± 0.32 | 1.82 ± 0.29 | NS |
| mg/dl · kg FM−1 | 3.61 ± 1.52 | 4.39 ± 1.93 | 4.67 ± 1.78 | 0.0031 |
| mg/dl · kg BSA−1 | 43.25 ± 6.40 | 45.22 ± 7.32 | 46.75 ± 6.30 | 0.0081 |
NS: no significance
Fig. 1:Linear trend between glucose levels and fat mass (kg); (correlation Coefficient r = 0.1199; r2 = 0.01437)
Fig. 2:Male Subjects variables: WHR (Waist–hip ratio); BSA (Body Surface Area, m2); Glycemia (* Glucose levels reported in mg/dl ·kg FM−1); FM% (** Body Fat Mass reported in % divided by 10)
Fig. 3:Female Subjects variables: WHR (Waist–hip ratio); BSA (Body Surface Area, m2); Glycemia (* Glucose levels reported in mg/dl ·kg FM−1); FM% (** Body Fat Mass reported in % divided by 10)