Literature DB >> 23556916

Analog receive signal processing for magnetic particle imaging.

Matthias Graeser1, Tobias Knopp, Mandy Grüttner, Timo F Sattel, Thorsten M Buzug.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Magnetic particle imaging (MPI) applies oscillating magnetic fields to determine the distribution of magnetic nanoparticles in vivo. Using a receive coil, the change of the particle magnetization can be detected. However, the signal induced by the nanoparticles is superimposed by the direct feedthrough interference of the sinusoidal excitation field, which couples into the receive coils. As the latter is several magnitudes higher, the extraction of the particle signal from the excitation signal is a challenging task.
METHODS: One way to remove the interfering signal is to suppress the excitation signal by means of a band-stop filter. However, this technique removes parts of the desired particle signal, which are essential for direct reconstruction of the particle concentration. A way to recover the entire particle signal is to cancel out the excitation signal by coupling a matching cancellation signal into the receive chain. However, the suppression rates that can be achieved by signal cancellation are not as high as with the filtering method, which limits the sensitivity of this method. In order to unite the advantages of both methods, in this work the authors propose to combine the filtering and the cancellation technique. All methods were compared by measuring 10 μl Resovist, in the same field generator only switching the signal processing parts.
RESULTS: The reconstructed time signals of the three methods, show the advantage of the proposed combination of filtering and cancellation. The method preserves the fundamental frequency and is able to detect the tracer signal at its full bandwidth even for low concentrations.
CONCLUSIONS: By recovering the full particle signal the SNR can be improved and errors in the x-space reconstruction are prevented. The authors show that the combined method provides this full particle signal and makes it possible to improve image quality.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23556916     DOI: 10.1118/1.4794482

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  12 in total

1.  Pulsed Excitation in Magnetic Particle Imaging.

Authors:  Zhi Wei Tay; Daniel Hensley; Jie Ma; Prashant Chandrasekharan; Bo Zheng; Patrick Goodwill; Steven Conolly
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2019-02-11       Impact factor: 10.048

2.  Magnetic nanoparticle sensing: decoupling the magnetization from the excitation field.

Authors:  Daniel B Reeves; John B Weaver
Journal:  J Phys D Appl Phys       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 3.207

3.  Magnetic Particle Spectroscopy with One-Stage Lock-In Implementation for Magnetic Bioassays with Improved Sensitivities.

Authors:  Vinit Kumar Chugh; Kai Wu; Venkatramana D Krishna; Arturo di Girolamo; Robert P Bloom; Yongqiang Andrew Wang; Renata Saha; Shuang Liang; Maxim C-J Cheeran; Jian-Ping Wang
Journal:  J Phys Chem C Nanomater Interfaces       Date:  2021-07-30       Impact factor: 4.177

4.  Optimization of Drive Parameters for Resolution, Sensitivity and Safety in Magnetic Particle Imaging.

Authors:  Zhi Wei Tay; Daniel W Hensley; Prashant Chandrasekharan; Bo Zheng; Steven M Conolly
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2019-12-02       Impact factor: 10.048

5.  Flexible and modular MPI simulation framework and its use in modelling a μMPI.

Authors:  Marcel Straub; Twan Lammers; Fabian Kiessling; Volkmar Schulz
Journal:  IEEE Trans Magn       Date:  2015-02-01       Impact factor: 1.700

6.  A FIELD CANCELATION SIGNAL EXTRACTION METHOD FOR MAGNETIC PARTICLE IMAGING.

Authors:  Volkmar Schulz; Marcel Straub; Max Mahlke; Simon Hubertus; Twan Lammers; Fabian Kiessling
Journal:  IEEE Trans Magn       Date:  2015-02-01       Impact factor: 1.700

Review 7.  Magnetic particle imaging: current developments and future directions.

Authors:  Nikolaos Panagiotopoulos; Robert L Duschka; Mandy Ahlborg; Gael Bringout; Christina Debbeler; Matthias Graeser; Christian Kaethner; Kerstin Lüdtke-Buzug; Hanne Medimagh; Jan Stelzner; Thorsten M Buzug; Jörg Barkhausen; Florian M Vogt; Julian Haegele
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2015-04-22

8.  Human-sized magnetic particle imaging for brain applications.

Authors:  M Graeser; F Thieben; P Szwargulski; F Werner; N Gdaniec; M Boberg; F Griese; M Möddel; P Ludewig; D van de Ven; O M Weber; O Woywode; B Gleich; T Knopp
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2019-04-26       Impact factor: 14.919

9.  A High-Throughput, Arbitrary-Waveform, MPI Spectrometer and Relaxometer for Comprehensive Magnetic Particle Optimization and Characterization.

Authors:  Zhi Wei Tay; Patrick W Goodwill; Daniel W Hensley; Laura A Taylor; Bo Zheng; Steven M Conolly
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-09-30       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Towards Picogram Detection of Superparamagnetic Iron-Oxide Particles Using a Gradiometric Receive Coil.

Authors:  Matthias Graeser; Tobias Knopp; Patryk Szwargulski; Thomas Friedrich; Anselm von Gladiss; Michael Kaul; Kannan M Krishnan; Harald Ittrich; Gerhard Adam; Thorsten M Buzug
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-07-31       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.