| Literature DB >> 23556128 |
Abstract
This review deals with the application of the pulsed electron double resonance (PELDOR) method to studies of spin-labeled DNA and RNA with complicated spatial structures, such as tetramers, aptamers, riboswitches, and three- and four-way junctions. The use of this method for studying DNA damage sites is also described.Entities:
Keywords: DNA; RNA; oligonucleotides; pulsed electron double resonance (PELDOR); spin-labels
Year: 2013 PMID: 23556128 PMCID: PMC3612823
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Acta Naturae ISSN: 2075-8251 Impact factor: 1.845
Spin-labeled DNA duplexes with nicks and insertions [77]
| A |
|
|
| B |
| |
| C |
|
|
| D |
| Gap |
|
|
|
|
| F |
| Insertion A1 |
Fig. 18The intramolecular contribution to the PELDOR signal obtained for complexes of DNA with Fpg [79]. (A) Curves 1 and 2 refer to DNA G/C17 and F/C17/Fpg, respectively; curves 3 and 4 refer to DNA G/C13 and F/C13/Fpg, respectively. For convenience of comparison, curves 1 and 2 are shifted upwards relative to curves 3 and 4. The smooth curves were calculated using the distribution functions shown in Fig. 18B. (B) The distance distribution function between labels, F(r), obtained from the data in Fig. 18 (A) neglecting the orientational selectivity. Curves 1 and 2 refer to DNA G/C17 and F/C17/Fpg, respectively; curves 3 and 4 refer to DNA G/C13 and F/C13/Fpg, respectively. (Reproduced by permission from The Royal Society of Chemistry: [Kuznetsov N.A., Milov A.D., Isaev N.P., VorobjevYu.N., Koval V.V., Dzuba S.A., Fedorova O.S., TsvetkovYu.D. (2011) Mol. BioSystems 7, 2670-2680], copyright 2009)
Experimental and calculated distances between the spin labels (nm) for the A- and B-form of DNA
| DNA duplex | PELDOR | B-form, O–O distance, MD calculation | PELDOR | A-form, O–O distance, MD calculation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| (4;20) | 5.6 ± 0.2 | 5.6 ± 0.3 | 4.8 ± 0.2 | 4.5 ± 0.4 |
| (4;19) | 5.1 ± 0.2 | 5.1 ± 0.3 | 4.6 ± 0.3 | 4.4 ± 0.4 |
| (4;18') | 4.9 ± 0.2 | 4.8 ± 0.4 | 4.3 ± 0.3 | 4.2 ± 0.4 |
| (4;14') | 3.2 ± 0.2 | 3.6 ± 0.3 | 2.8 ± 0.3 | 3.3 ± 0.3 |
Nucleic acids studied in [70]
| Sample | Nucleotide sequence* |
|---|---|
| A hairpin (U6–U11) | 5'-GGC-AC |
| Neomycin riboswitch (U14–U26) | 5'-GGC-UGC-UU G-UCC -U |
| DNA duplex | 5'-GCT -GAT-A |
| 3'-CGA-C |
* Spin-labeled nucleotides are shown in bold.
Experimental distances rmax between the spin labels and widths of the Δ-bands of the spectra lines (nm) in the duplexes with spin labels at positions (4;11) [77]
| DNA duplex |
| Δ |
|---|---|---|
| Undamaged duplex | 2.81 ± 0.01 | 0.21 ± 0.02 |
| Nick | 2.87 ± 0.01 | 0.22 ± 0.02 |
| Gap | 2.84 ± 0.01 | 0.26 ± 0.02 |
| Insertion А1 | 2.85 ± 0.02 | 0.23 ± 0.02 |
| 8-oxoG (E1 duplex) | 2.81 ± 0.01 | 0.22 ± 0.02 |
| 8-oxoG (E2 duplex) | 2.84 ± 0.01 | 0.27 ± 0.02 |
| THF | 2.46 ± 0.02 | 0.35 ± 0.02 |
| Ethyl | 2.65 ± 0.02 | 0.38 ± 0.04 |
| Propyl | 2.48 ± 0.02 | 0.45 ± 0.03 |
Structures of radical R, nucleotides, and non-nucleotide insertions [78, 79]
|
|
|
|
|
|
| THF | G | deg2p | R | 8-oxoG |
Parameters of the distance spectra (nm) for 12-meric oligonucleotides and their DNA duplexes ;[78]
| Sample* | Average distance, r | Width, Δ |
|---|---|---|
| sG/C12 | 4.05 ± 0.05 | 2.8 ± 0.2 |
| sTHF/C12 | 4.32 ± 0.05 | 2.85 ± 0.2 |
| G/C12 | 4.35 ± 0.03 | 0.98 ± 0.1 |
| deg2p/C12 | 4.23 ± 0.03 | 1.39 ± 0.1 |
| THF/C12 | 4.26 ± 0.03 | 0.95 ± 0.1 |
* Symbol s denotes the single-stranded DNA.
Parameters (nm) of the distance distribution function F(r) between two spin labels in the DNA duplexes [79]
| Sample | Δ, nm* | |
|---|---|---|
| G/C13 | 4.96 | 1.1 |
| 8-oxoG/C13 | 4.96 | 1.1 |
| THF/C13 | 4.83 | 1.1 |
| THF/C13/Fpg | 4.60 | 1.2 |
| G/C13/Fpg | 4.78 | 1.1 |
| G/C17 | 6.00 | 1.2 |
| 8-oxoG/C17 | 6.02 | 1.2 |
| THF/C17 | 5.98 | 1.2 |
| THF/C17/Fpg | 5.76 | 1.2 |
| G/C17/Fpg | 5.99 | 1.4 |
* rmax and Δ were measured with errors of 0.8 and 10%, respectively.