Literature DB >> 23555006

Genetic variant rs7758229 in 6q26-q27 is not associated with colorectal cancer risk in a Chinese population.

Lingjun Zhu1, Mulong Du, Dongying Gu, Lan Ma, Haiyan Chu, Na Tong, Jinfei Chen, Zhengdong Zhang, Meilin Wang.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A recent genome-wide association study has identified a new genetic variant rs7758229 in SLC22A3 for colorectal cancer susceptibility in a Japanese population, but it is unknown whether this newly identified variant is associated with colorectal cancer in other populations, including the Chinese population.
METHODS: We examined the associations between rs7758229 and colorectal cancer risk among 1,147 cases and 1,203 controls matched by age and sex. Logistic regression model was used to assess the associations.
RESULTS: No significant association was found between rs7758229 and colorectal cancer risk (OR = 0.95, 95%CI = 0.84-1.09, P = 0.463). Similar results were observed in the stratification of tumor location (OR = 0.94, 95%CI = 0.80-1.11, P = 0.481 for colon cancer, and OR = 0.96, 95%CI = 0.82-1.13, P = 0.621 for rectum cancer).
CONCLUSIONS: Our findings did not support an association between rs7758229 in 6q26-q27 and the risk of colorectal cancer in a Chinese population.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23555006      PMCID: PMC3595231          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0059256

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


Introduction

Colorectal cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related death in most countries, which is caused by a combination of genetic and environmental risk factors [1], [2], [3]. Twin studies have shown that genetic susceptibility accounts for ∼35% of disease etiology, most of which is still unclear [4]. Recent widespread availability of high-throughput genomic approaches have provided the opportunity to scan the genomes of large numbers of individuals in genome-wide association studies (GWAS) rapidly [5]. Several GWAS have been completed with the aim of identifying genetic variants influencing the risk of colorectal cancer [6]. Previously, three validation [7], [8], [9] studies in Chinese failed to replicate most of GWAS-identified loci, suggesting that genetic heterogeneity existed between Caucasians and Asians. Recently, Cui et al. conducted a GWAS in a Japanese population (4,809 colorectal cancer cases and 2,973 controls) and identified a new locus rs7758229 in SLC22A3 for distal colon cancer [10]. Moreover, they found cumulative effects of rs7758229, other genetic and environmental factors could increase colorectal cancer risk. However, little or nothing is known about whether the effect of this locus exists in other Asian populations. Here, we carried out an independent case-control study to assess the association between rs7758229 identified by Cui et al. and colorectal cancer risk in a Chinese population.

Materials and Methods

Study population

The patients of colorectal cancer were recruited from September 2010 at the First Affiliated Hospital and Nanjing First Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, which have been described in detail previously [11]. All the cases were histologically confirmed colorectal adenocarcinoma. The pathological stage of colorectal cancer was classified into Dukes A, B, C, and D. Tumor grade was divided into low, intermediate, and high. The control subjects were randomly selected from a pool of more than 25,000 cancer-free individuals on the basis of physical examinations and frequency-matched to cases on age and sex. The exclusion criteria included no history of cancer. After having signed informed consent, each subject donated 5 ml of blood for genomic DNA extraction. This study was approved by the institutional review boards of Nanjing Medical University.

Genotyping

Genomic DNA was isolated from peripheral blood lymphocytes. In this study, rs7758229 was genotyped using the TaqMan assay (Applied Biosystems). The sequences of primer and probe for each SNP are available on request. Genomic DNA of 50 ng and 0.5×mix (TaKaRa Bio, JPN) was used for each reaction and amplification was performed under the following conditions: 50°C for 2 min, 95°C for 10 min followed by 45 cycles of 95°C for 15 sec, and 60°C for 1 min. We assessed genotype data quality by typing 10% blinded replicate samples; the concordance rate was 100.0%.

Statistical analyses

Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium of the controls' genotype distributions was tested by a goodness-of-fit chi-square test. Unconditional univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to obtain crude and adjusted odds ratios (ORs) for risk of colorectal cancer and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs). A P value <0.05 was considered statistically significant, and all statistical tests were two sided. Statistical analyses were done using SAS software, release 9.1 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC).

Results

A total of 1,147 colorectal cancer cases and 1,203 control subjects were included in this study (Table 1). The mean age was 60.1 years old for cases and 59.9 years old for controls. Cases were more likely to have family members with cancer than controls (21.2% versus 10.6%, P<0.001). The observed rs7758229 genotype frequencies among the control subjects were in agreement with the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (P = 0.778). As shown in Table 2, the frequencies of GG, GT and TT genotypes were 58.3%, 35.6%, and 6.1%, respectively, among the cases, and 56.4%, 37.6%, and 6.0%, respectively, among the controls. Furthermore, rs7758229 T allele frequency was 0.248 among the cases and 0.238 among the controls, and the difference was not statistically significant (OR = 0.95, 95%CI = 0.84–1.09, P = 0.463). We performed a stratification analysis according to tumor location (colon and rectum) to examine the association between rs7758229 and colorectal cancer risk. Similarly, rs7758229 T allele was not associated with the risk of colon cancer or rectum cancer, compared with the G allele (OR = 0.94, 95%CI = 0.80–1.11, P = 0.481 for colon cancer, and OR = 0.96, 95%CI  = 0.82–1.13, P = 0.621 for rectum cancer).
Table 1

Characteristics of colorectal cancer cases and controls.

VariablesCases (n = 1147)Controls (n = 1203)
N%N%
Age (mean ± SD)60.1±12.659.9±14.3
Sex
Male70261.269858.0
Female44538.850542.0
Family history of cancer
No90478.8107689.4
Yes24321.212710.6
Tumor site
Colon55948.7
Rectum58851.3
Dukes stage
A978.4
B49443.1
C42236.8
D13411.7
Tumor grade
Low857.4
Intermediate88076.7
High18215.9
Table 2

Genotype and allelic frequencies of rs7758229 among cases and controls and associations with risk of colorectal cancer.

Chr. 6q26-q27ControlsTotal colorectal cancer casesColonRectum
N (%)N (%)OR (95% CI)a P a N (%)OR (95% CI)a P a N (%)OR (95% CI)a P a
rs7758229
GG679 (56.4)669 (58.3)1.00325 (58.1)1.00344 (58.5)1.00
GT452 (37.6)408 (35.6)0.92 (0.77-1.09)0.308203 (36.3)0.94 (0.76-1.16)0.547205 (34.9)0.89 (0.72-1.10)0.292
TT72 (6.0)70 (6.1)0.98 (0.69-1.39)0.91531 (5.6)0.90 (0.58-1.40)0.63139 (6.6)1.06 (0.70-1.60)0.777
T alleleb 0.2480.2380.95 (0.84-1.09)0.4630.2370.94 (0.80-1.11)0.4810.2410.96 (0.82-1.13)0.621

Adjusted for age and sex in logistic regression model.

Additive model.

Adjusted for age and sex in logistic regression model. Additive model.

Discussion

In the present study, we found no statistically significant association between rs7758229 in SLC22A3 and colorectal cancer risk, and no association with the risk of tumor location. Our inability of replicate the findings of Cui et al. [10] may be due to several reasons. First, a weak and inadequate power may explain our inconsistent results. However, this study had reasonable power (>75%) to detect an OR of 1.28 per copy of T allele, which had been reported previously by Cui et al. [10]. Second, we recruited colorectal cancer cases from hospitals and selected controls from populations, which might not well represent the whole population and might result in potential selection bias. Third, it is biologically conceivable that the same susceptibility variant for colorectal cancer may be implicated across different populations. Therefore, the discrepant findings may be related to genetic and/or environmental modifiers that vary in frequency between the Chinese populations and the Japanese populations. Finally, Cui et al, reported that rs7758229 had a more significant association with the risk of distal colon cancer (P = 7.92×10−9) than colorectal cancer (P = 1.31×10−5) [10], suggesting that their carcinomas have different pathological mechanisms of carcinogenesis involving different genetic and epigenetic defects [12]. In conclusion, our study confirmed that rs7758229 in 6q26-q27 may not contribute to the risk of colorectal cancer in a Chinese population. Therefore, further other loci and large-scale GWAS of colorectal cancer in the Chinese population are expecting.
  12 in total

1.  Risk of genome-wide association study-identified genetic variants for colorectal cancer in a Chinese population.

Authors:  Fang Xiong; Chen Wu; Xinyu Bi; Dianke Yu; Liming Huang; Jian Xu; Tongwen Zhang; Kan Zhai; Jiang Chang; Wen Tan; Jianqiang Cai; Dongxin Lin
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2010-06-08       Impact factor: 4.254

2.  Clinical impact of molecular genetic diagnosis, genetic counseling, and management of hereditary cancer. Part II: Hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal carcinoma as a model.

Authors:  H T Lynch; P Watson; T G Shaw; J F Lynch; A E Harty; B A Franklin; C R Kapler; S T Tinley; B Liu; C Lerman
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1999-12-01       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 3.  Molecular pathological epidemiology of colorectal neoplasia: an emerging transdisciplinary and interdisciplinary field.

Authors:  Shuji Ogino; Andrew T Chan; Charles S Fuchs; Edward Giovannucci
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2010-10-29       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 4.  Epidemiology - identifying the causes and preventability of cancer?

Authors:  Graham A Colditz; Thomas A Sellers; Edward Trapido
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 60.716

5.  Mechanisms of oncogenesis in colon versus rectal cancer.

Authors:  E Kapiteijn; G J Liefers; L C Los; E K Kranenbarg; J Hermans; R A Tollenaar; Y Moriya; C J van de Velde; J H van Krieken
Journal:  J Pathol       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 7.996

6.  Environmental and heritable factors in the causation of cancer--analyses of cohorts of twins from Sweden, Denmark, and Finland.

Authors:  P Lichtenstein; N V Holm; P K Verkasalo; A Iliadou; J Kaprio; M Koskenvuo; E Pukkala; A Skytthe; K Hemminki
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2000-07-13       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Association of Caucasian-identified variants with colorectal cancer risk in Singapore Chinese.

Authors:  Lai Fun Thean; Hui Hua Li; Yik Ying Teo; Woon-Puay Koh; Jian-Min Yuan; Mei Lin Teoh; Poh Koon Koh; Choong Leong Tang; Peh Yean Cheah
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-08-03       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Common variant in 6q26-q27 is associated with distal colon cancer in an Asian population.

Authors:  R Cui; Y Okada; S G Jang; J L Ku; J G Park; Y Kamatani; N Hosono; T Tsunoda; V Kumar; C Tanikawa; N Kamatani; R Yamada; M Kubo; Y Nakamura; K Matsuda
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2011-01-17       Impact factor: 23.059

9.  Replication study of SNP associations for colorectal cancer in Hong Kong Chinese.

Authors:  J W Ho; S-c Choi; Y-f Lee; T C Hui; S S Cherny; M-M Garcia-Barceló; L Carvajal-Carmona; R Liu; S-h To; T-k Yau; C C Chung; C C Yau; S M Hui; P Y Lau; C-h Yuen; Y-w Wong; S Ho; S S Fung; I P Tomlinson; R S Houlston; K K Cheng; P C Sham
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2010-12-21       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Genomewide association studies and human disease.

Authors:  John Hardy; Andrew Singleton
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2009-04-15       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  4 in total

1.  Identification of a shared protective genetic susceptibility locus for colorectal cancer and gastric cancer.

Authors:  Na He; Lijun Liu; Xianglong Duan; Li Wang; Dongya Yuan; Tianbo Jin; Longli Kang
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2015-09-17

2.  Genetic variants in SLC22A3 contribute to the susceptibility to colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Anjing Ren; Shanwen Sun; Shuwei Li; Tao Chen; Yongqian Shu; Mulong Du; Lingjun Zhu
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2019-01-03       Impact factor: 7.396

3.  Genetic risk factors for colorectal cancer in multiethnic Indonesians.

Authors:  Irawan Yusuf; Bens Pardamean; James W Baurley; Arif Budiarto; Upik A Miskad; Ronald E Lusikooy; Arham Arsyad; Akram Irwan; George Mathew; Ivet Suriapranata; Rinaldy Kusuma; Muhamad F Kacamarga; Tjeng W Cenggoro; Christopher McMahan; Chase Joyner; Carissa I Pardamean
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-05-11       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 4.  Solute carrier transporters: potential targets for digestive system neoplasms.

Authors:  Jing Xie; Xiao Yan Zhu; Lu Ming Liu; Zhi Qiang Meng
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2018-01-24       Impact factor: 3.989

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.