Literature DB >> 11592095

Mechanisms of oncogenesis in colon versus rectal cancer.

E Kapiteijn1, G J Liefers, L C Los, E K Kranenbarg, J Hermans, R A Tollenaar, Y Moriya, C J van de Velde, J H van Krieken.   

Abstract

Observations support the theory that development of left- and right-sided colorectal cancers may involve different mechanisms. This study investigated different genes involved in oncogenesis of colon and rectal cancers and analysed their prognostic value. The study group comprised 35 colon and 42 rectal cancers. Rectal cancer patients had been treated with standardized surgery performed by an experienced rectal cancer surgeon. Mutation analysis was performed for p53 in eight colon cancers and for APC and p53 in 22 rectal cancers. MLH1, MSH2, Bcl-2, p53, E-cadherin and beta-catenin were investigated by immunohistochemistry in all colorectal tumours. APC mutation analysis of the MCR showed truncating mutations in 18 of 22 rectal tumours (82%), but the presence of an APC mutation was not related to nuclear beta-catenin expression (p=0.75). Rectal cancers showed significantly more nuclear beta-catenin than colon cancers (65% versus 40%, p=0.04). p53 mutation analysis corresponded well with p53 immunohistochemistry (p<0.001). Rectal cancers showed significantly more immunohistochemical expression of p53 than colon cancers (64% versus 29%, p=0.003). In rectal cancers, a significant correlation was found between positive p53 expression and worse disease-free survival (p=0.008), but not in colon cancers. Cox regression showed that p53-expression (p=0.03) was an independent predictor for disease-free survival in rectal cancers. This study concluded that rectal cancer may involve more nuclear beta-catenin in the APC/beta-catenin pathway than colon cancer and/or nuclear beta-catenin may have another role in rectal cancer independently of APC. The p53-pathway seems to be more important in rectal cancer, in which it also has independent prognostic value. When prognostic markers are investigated in larger series, differences in biological behaviour between colon and rectal cancer should be considered. Copyright 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11592095     DOI: 10.1002/path.918

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pathol        ISSN: 0022-3417            Impact factor:   7.996


  70 in total

1.  Postsurgical disparity in survival between African Americans and Caucasians with colonic adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Dominik Alexander; Chakrapani Chatla; Ellen Funkhouser; Sreelatha Meleth; William E Grizzle; Upender Manne
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2004-07-01       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  Glutathione peroxidase tagSNPs: associations with rectal cancer but not with colon cancer.

Authors:  Ulrike Haug; Elizabeth M Poole; Liren Xiao; Karen Curtin; David Duggan; Li Hsu; Karen W Makar; Ulrike Peters; Richard J Kulmacz; John D Potter; Lisel Koepl; Bette J Caan; Martha L Slattery; Cornelia M Ulrich
Journal:  Genes Chromosomes Cancer       Date:  2012-02-27       Impact factor: 5.006

3.  Wnt pathway may not be implicated in all routes to colorectal cancer.

Authors:  J R Jass
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 23.059

4.  Differential gene expression in colon cancer of the caecum versus the sigmoid and rectosigmoid.

Authors:  K Birkenkamp-Demtroder; S H Olesen; F B Sørensen; S Laurberg; P Laiho; L A Aaltonen; T F Orntoft
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 23.059

5.  Opposite association of serum prolactin and survival in patients with colon and rectal carcinomas: influence of preoperative radiotherapy.

Authors:  Marcos Gutiéerrez De La Barrera; Belem Trejo; Pedro Luna-Péerez; Fernándo López-Barrera; Gonzalo Martínez De La Escalera; Carmen Clapp
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 3.199

6.  Novel diet-related mouse model of colon cancer parallels human colon cancer.

Authors:  Anil R Prasad; Shilpa Prasad; Huy Nguyen; Alexander Facista; Cristy Lewis; Beryl Zaitlin; Harris Bernstein; Carol Bernstein
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2014-07-15

7.  Prognostic factors for overall survival in metastatic colorectal cancer using a stop-and-go FLIRI-based treatment strategy.

Authors:  Camilla S Kronborg; Anni R Jensen
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2015-05-23       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  Differences in protein expression and gene amplification of cyclins between colon and rectal adenocarcinomas.

Authors:  Rolf Aamodt; Kristin Jonsdottir; Solveig Norheim Andersen; Johan Bondi; Geir Bukholm; Ida R K Bukholm
Journal:  Gastroenterol Res Pract       Date:  2009-12-15       Impact factor: 2.260

9.  Loss of heterozygosity on long arm of chromosome 22 in sporadic colorectal carcinoma.

Authors:  Chong-Zhi Zhou; Zhi-Hai Peng; Fang Zhang; Guo-Qiang Qiu; Lin He
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 5.742

10.  Epigenetic inactivation of the novel candidate tumor suppressor gene ITIH5 in colon cancer predicts unfavorable overall survival in the CpG island methylator phenotype.

Authors:  Vera Kloten; Michael Rose; Sophie Kaspar; Saskia von Stillfried; Ruth Knüchel; Edgar Dahl
Journal:  Epigenetics       Date:  2014-08-04       Impact factor: 4.528

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.