Literature DB >> 23552992

Biomarker testing for ovarian cancer: clinical utility of multiplex assays.

Brian M Nolen1, Anna E Lokshin.   

Abstract

The improved detection of ovarian cancer at the earliest stages of development would confer a significant benefit in the therapeutic efficacy and overall survival associated with this devastating disease. The inadequate performance of currently used imaging modalities and the CA 125 biomarker test have precluded the establishment of screening programs and hindered the development of diagnostic tests for ovarian cancer. Two recently completed large clinical trials of ovarian cancer screening have reported findings of mixed impact, further clouding the issue. Considerable effort has been applied to the development of multiplexed biomarker-based tests and the most recent advances are discussed here. Within the clinical setting of pelvic mass differential diagnosis and triage, several significant advancements have been achieved recently, including the US Food and Drug Administration-approved Risk of Ovarian Malignancy Algorithm and OVA1 tests. The development and evaluation of those tests are described in this review. Thus while effective routine screening for ovarian cancer remains a lofty goal, advancement within the clinical management of pelvic mass diagnoses appears to be near at hand.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23552992      PMCID: PMC3670781          DOI: 10.1007/s40291-013-0027-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Diagn Ther        ISSN: 1177-1062            Impact factor:   4.074


  61 in total

1.  Human epididymis protein 4 (HE4) as a serum tumor biomarker in patients with ovarian carcinoma.

Authors:  Xiaohong Chang; Xue Ye; Li Dong; Hongyan Cheng; Yexia Cheng; Lirong Zhu; Qinping Liao; Yang Zhao; Li Tian; Tianyun Fu; Jun Chen; Heng Cui
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 3.437

2.  HE4 and epithelial ovarian cancer: comparison and clinical evaluation of two immunoassays and a combination algorithm.

Authors:  Giuseppina Ruggeri; Elisabetta Bandiera; Laura Zanotti; Silvana Belloli; Antonella Ravaggi; Chiara Romani; Eliana Bignotti; Renata A Tassi; Germana Tognon; Claudio Galli; Luigi Caimi; Sergio Pecorelli
Journal:  Clin Chim Acta       Date:  2011-04-30       Impact factor: 3.786

3.  Human epididymis protein 4 offers superior specificity in the differentiation of benign and malignant adnexal masses in premenopausal women.

Authors:  Kevin Holcomb; Zivjena Vucetic; M Craig Miller; Robert C Knapp
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2011-05-14       Impact factor: 8.661

4.  A novel multiple marker bioassay utilizing HE4 and CA125 for the prediction of ovarian cancer in patients with a pelvic mass.

Authors:  Richard G Moore; D Scott McMeekin; Amy K Brown; Paul DiSilvestro; M Craig Miller; W Jeffrey Allard; Walter Gajewski; Robert Kurman; Robert C Bast; Steven J Skates
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2008-10-12       Impact factor: 5.482

5.  Sensitivity and specificity of multimodal and ultrasound screening for ovarian cancer, and stage distribution of detected cancers: results of the prevalence screen of the UK Collaborative Trial of Ovarian Cancer Screening (UKCTOCS).

Authors:  Usha Menon; Aleksandra Gentry-Maharaj; Rachel Hallett; Andy Ryan; Matthew Burnell; Aarti Sharma; Sara Lewis; Susan Davies; Susan Philpott; Alberto Lopes; Keith Godfrey; David Oram; Jonathan Herod; Karin Williamson; Mourad W Seif; Ian Scott; Tim Mould; Robert Woolas; John Murdoch; Stephen Dobbs; Nazar N Amso; Simon Leeson; Derek Cruickshank; Alistair McGuire; Stuart Campbell; Lesley Fallowfield; Naveena Singh; Anne Dawnay; Steven J Skates; Mahesh Parmar; Ian Jacobs
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2009-03-11       Impact factor: 41.316

6.  How relevant are ACOG and SGO guidelines for referral of adnexal mass?

Authors:  Amy C Dearking; Giovanni D Aletti; Michaela E McGree; Amy L Weaver; Marla-Kay Sommerfield; William A Cliby
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 7.661

7.  Development of multiplexed bead-based immunoassays for the detection of early stage ovarian cancer using a combination of serum biomarkers.

Authors:  Yong-Wan Kim; Su Mi Bae; Hyunsun Lim; Yoon Ji Kim; Woong Shick Ahn
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-09-10       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  HE4 and CA125 as a diagnostic test in ovarian cancer: prospective validation of the Risk of Ovarian Malignancy Algorithm.

Authors:  T Van Gorp; I Cadron; E Despierre; A Daemen; K Leunen; F Amant; D Timmerman; B De Moor; I Vergote
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2011-02-08       Impact factor: 7.640

9.  Assessing lead time of selected ovarian cancer biomarkers: a nested case-control study.

Authors:  Garnet L Anderson; Martin McIntosh; Lieling Wu; Matt Barnett; Gary Goodman; Jason D Thorpe; Lindsay Bergan; Mark D Thornquist; Nathalie Scholler; Nam Kim; Kathy O'Briant; Charles Drescher; Nicole Urban
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2009-12-30       Impact factor: 13.506

10.  Phase II biomarker trial of a multimarker diagnostic for ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Tracey Edgell; G Martin-Roussety; G Barker; D J Autelitano; D Allen; P Grant; G E Rice
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-01-16       Impact factor: 4.553

View more
  30 in total

Review 1.  Emerging diagnostic, prognostic and therapeutic biomarkers for ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Khalid El Bairi; Abdul Hafeez Kandhro; Adel Gouri; Wafaa Mahfoud; Noureddine Louanjli; Brahim Saadani; Said Afqir; Mariam Amrani
Journal:  Cell Oncol (Dordr)       Date:  2016-12-15       Impact factor: 6.730

Review 2.  Serum Biomarker Based Algorithms in Diagnosis of Ovarian Cancer: A Review.

Authors:  Suchitra Kumari
Journal:  Indian J Clin Biochem       Date:  2018-08-06

Review 3.  Development of nanoscale approaches for ovarian cancer therapeutics and diagnostics.

Authors:  Sarah A Engelberth; Nadine Hempel; Magnus Bergkvist
Journal:  Crit Rev Oncog       Date:  2014

4.  Detection of the HE4 protein in urine as a biomarker for ovarian neoplasms: Clinical correlates.

Authors:  John B Liao; Yuen Yee Yip; Elizabeth M Swisher; Kathy Agnew; Karl Erik Hellstrom; Ingegerd Hellstrom
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2015-04-09       Impact factor: 5.482

5.  Advanced architectures in the design of responsive polymers for cancer nanomedicine.

Authors:  Angela M Wagner; Nicholas A Peppas; David S Spencer
Journal:  J Appl Polym Sci       Date:  2018-01-31       Impact factor: 3.125

6.  The influence of neighborhood socioeconomic status and race on survival from ovarian cancer: a population-based analysis of Cook County, Illinois.

Authors:  Katherine C Brewer; Caryn E Peterson; Faith G Davis; Kent Hoskins; Heather Pauls; Charlotte E Joslin
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2015-04-18       Impact factor: 3.797

7.  Methodical and pre-analytical characteristics of a multiplex cancer biomarker immunoassay.

Authors:  Natalie Hermann; Katja Dreßen; Frank A Schildberg; Christopher Jakobs; Stefan Holdenrieder
Journal:  World J Methodol       Date:  2014-12-26

8.  Simultaneous Measurement of 92 Serum Protein Biomarkers for the Development of a Multiprotein Classifier for Ovarian Cancer Detection.

Authors:  Amy P N Skubitz; Kristin L M Boylan; Kate Geschwind; Qing Cao; Timothy K Starr; Melissa A Geller; Joseph Celestino; Robert C Bast; Karen H Lu; Joseph S Koopmeiners
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2019-02-01

9.  A microfluidic ExoSearch chip for multiplexed exosome detection towards blood-based ovarian cancer diagnosis.

Authors:  Zheng Zhao; Yang Yang; Yong Zeng; Mei He
Journal:  Lab Chip       Date:  2016-02-07       Impact factor: 6.799

10.  Identification of novel candidate plasma metabolite biomarkers for distinguishing serous ovarian carcinoma and benign serous ovarian tumors.

Authors:  Matthew F Buas; Haiwei Gu; Danijel Djukovic; Jiangjiang Zhu; Charles W Drescher; Nicole Urban; Daniel Raftery; Christopher I Li
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2015-10-30       Impact factor: 5.482

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.