Literature DB >> 23548342

Patients' preferences regarding choice of end-stage renal disease treatment options.

Abdelmouttalib Maaroufi1, Coraline Fafin, Sophie Mougel, Guillaume Favre, Barbara Seitz-Polski, Ahmed Jeribi, Sandor Vido, Catherine Dewisme, Laetitia Albano, Vincent Esnault, Olivier Moranne.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Dialysis registries have reported a low take-up of home treatment. The aim of our study was to report patients' preferred treatment options for end-stage renal disease (ESRD) after information delivery, patients' characteristics by treatment preference, and the reasons for differences between treatment preference and the treatment delivered.
METHODS: A prospective cohort study on patients seen in our nephrology department between January 2009 and June 2011 included all patients with chronic kidney disease (GFR <20 ml/min/1.73 m(2)) and incident dialysis patients who received an information program about ESRD treatment options.
RESULTS: 228 patients received information delivery and either expressed a preference for a given renal replacement therapy (peritoneal dialysis, PD: 42%; hemodialysis, HD: 33%), remained undecided (20%) or expressed reluctance to undergo renal replacement therapy (5%). Multivariate analysis revealed that compared to HD preference, patients preferring PD were older (OR 1.02, 95% CI 1.0-1.04), had a lower BMI (OR 0.9, 95% CI 0.87-0.98) and were more likely to have been informed before rather than after starting dialysis (OR 3.4, 95% CI 1.5-7.4); home treatment was the main reason given for preferring PD. Undecided patients were mainly women and the majority were eventually treated by HD. Reluctant patients were the oldest (OR 1.12, 95% CI 1.02-1.22) and were rarely treated by dialysis. Only 24% of patients informed before and 8% of patients informed after starting dialysis were ultimately treated with PD. Reasons for a mismatch between dialysis modality preference and treatment delivered were equally distributed between medical and nonmedical.
CONCLUSION: Patients should be systematically informed before starting dialysis, patients' preferences should be taken into account before organizing dialysis and all treatment modalities should be available in all centers.
Copyright © 2013 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23548342     DOI: 10.1159/000348822

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Nephrol        ISSN: 0250-8095            Impact factor:   3.754


  13 in total

Review 1.  Selecting Peritoneal Dialysis in the Older Dialysis Population.

Authors:  Matthew J Oliver; Robert R Quinn
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 1.756

2.  Spatial Analysis of Case-Mix and Dialysis Modality Associations.

Authors:  Tamar Phirtskhalaishvili; Florian Bayer; Stephane Edet; Isabelle Bongiovanni; Julien Hogan; Cécile Couchoud
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2015-10-16       Impact factor: 1.756

3.  Effect of center practices on the choice of the first dialysis modality for children and young adults.

Authors:  Julien Hogan; Bruno Ranchin; Marc Fila; Jérome Harambat; Saoussen Krid; Isabelle Vrillon; Gwenaelle Roussey; Michel Fischbach; Cécile Couchoud
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2016-11-14       Impact factor: 3.714

Review 4.  Peritoneal Dialysis in Western Countries.

Authors:  Dirk G Struijk
Journal:  Kidney Dis (Basel)       Date:  2015-09-03

5.  A simple clinical tool to inform the decision-making process to refer elderly incident dialysis patients for kidney transplant evaluation.

Authors:  Emmanuelle Dusseux; Laetitia Albano; Coraline Fafin; Maryvonne Hourmant; Olivier Guérin; Cécile Couchoud; Olivier Moranne
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2015-02-11       Impact factor: 10.612

6.  Foreign Perspective on Achieving a Successful Peritoneal Dialysis-First Program.

Authors:  Philip Kam-Tao Li; Mark E Rosenberg
Journal:  Kidney360       Date:  2020-05-13

7.  Impacts of Geographic Distance on Peritoneal Dialysis Utilization: Refining Models of Treatment Selection.

Authors:  Virginia Wang; Matthew L Maciejewski; Cynthia J Coffman; Linda L Sanders; Shoou-Yih Daniel Lee; Richard Hirth; Joseph Messana
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2016-04-07       Impact factor: 3.402

8.  Economic impact of a modification of the treatment trajectories of patients with end-stage renal disease.

Authors:  Cécile Couchoud; Anne-Line Couillerot; Emmanuelle Dantony; Mad-Hélénie Elsensohn; Michel Labeeuw; Emmanuel Villar; René Ecochard; Isabelle Bongiovanni
Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant       Date:  2015-08-12       Impact factor: 5.992

Review 9.  Assisted Peritoneal Dialysis for Older People with End-Stage Renal Disease: The French and Danish Experience.

Authors:  Clémence Béchade; Thierry Lobbedez; Per Ivarsen; Johan V Povlsen
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 1.756

Review 10.  The changing landscape of home dialysis in the United States.

Authors:  Matthew B Rivara; Rajnish Mehrotra
Journal:  Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 2.894

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.