Literature DB >> 27844146

Effect of center practices on the choice of the first dialysis modality for children and young adults.

Julien Hogan1,2, Bruno Ranchin3, Marc Fila4, Jérome Harambat5, Saoussen Krid6, Isabelle Vrillon7, Gwenaelle Roussey8, Michel Fischbach9, Cécile Couchoud10.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Peritoneal dialysis (PD) remains the modality of choice in children, but there is no clear evidence to support a better outcome in children treated with PD. We aimed to assess factors that have an impact on the choice of dialysis modality in children and young adults in France and sought to determine the roles of medical factors and center practices.
METHODS: We included all patients aged <20 years at the start of renal replacement therapy (RRT), recorded in the French RRT Registry between 2002 and 2013. Hierarchical logistic regression models were used to study the association between the patient/center characteristics and the probability of receiving PD as the first dialysis modality.
RESULTS: We included 806 patients starting RRT in 177 centers, 23 of which were specialized pediatric centers. Six hundred and one patients (74.6 %) started with hemodialysis (HD), whereas 205 (25.4 %) started with PD. A greater probability of PD was found in younger children, whereas starting the treatment in an emergency setting was associated with a low use of PD. We found a significant variability among centers that accounted for 43 % of the total variability. The probability of PD was higher in adult centers and was proportional to the rate of PD in the center.
CONCLUSIONS: Center practices are a major factor in the choice of dialysis modality. This raises concerns about patient and family choices and to what extent doctors may influence the final decision. Further pediatric studies focusing on children's and parents' wishes are needed to provide care as close as possible to patients' and families' expectations.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Children; Dialysis modality; Epidemiology; Hemodialysis; Peritoneal dialysis

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27844146     DOI: 10.1007/s00467-016-3538-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol        ISSN: 0931-041X            Impact factor:   3.714


  42 in total

1.  Hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis are associated with similar outcomes for end-stage renal disease treatment in Canada.

Authors:  Karen Yeates; Naisu Zhu; Edward Vonesh; Lilyanna Trpeski; Peter Blake; Stanley Fenton
Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant       Date:  2012-03-05       Impact factor: 5.992

Review 2.  Outcomes of early versus late nephrology referral in chronic kidney disease: a systematic review.

Authors:  Neil A Smart; Thomas T Titus
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 4.965

3.  Socioeconomic differences in the uptake of home dialysis.

Authors:  Blair S Grace; Philip A Clayton; Nicholas A Gray; Stephen P McDonald
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2014-04-24       Impact factor: 8.237

4.  [ESRD in children and adolescents].

Authors:  J Harambat; J Hogan; M-Al Macher; C Couchoud
Journal:  Nephrol Ther       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 0.722

5.  What influences patient choice of treatment modality at the pre-dialysis stage?

Authors:  Dimitrios Chanouzas; Khai Ping Ng; Bassam Fallouh; Jyoti Baharani
Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant       Date:  2011-08-23       Impact factor: 5.992

6.  Access to, and outcome of, renal transplantation according to treatment modality of end-stage renal disease in France.

Authors:  Ylana Chalem; Jean-Philippe Ryckelynck; Philippe Tuppin; Christian Verger; Sylvie Chauvé; Denis Glotz
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 10.612

7.  Peritoneal dialysis in elderly patients: report from the French Peritoneal Dialysis Registry (RDPLF).

Authors:  Cindy Castrale; David Evans; Christian Verger; Emmanuel Fabre; Didier Aguilera; Jean-Philippe Ryckelynck; Thierry Lobbedez
Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant       Date:  2009-08-07       Impact factor: 5.992

Review 8.  Mortality studies comparing peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis: what do they tell us?

Authors:  E F Vonesh; J J Snyder; R N Foley; A J Collins
Journal:  Kidney Int Suppl       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 10.545

9.  The renal epidemiology and information network (REIN): a new registry for end-stage renal disease in France.

Authors:  Cécile Couchoud; Bénédicte Stengel; Paul Landais; Jean-Claude Aldigier; François de Cornelissen; Christian Dabot; Hervé Maheut; Véronique Joyeux; Michèle Kessler; Michel Labeeuw; Hubert Isnard; Christian Jacquelinet
Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant       Date:  2005-10-18       Impact factor: 5.992

10.  Determinants of peritoneal dialysis technique failure in incident US patients.

Authors:  Jenny I Shen; Aya A Mitani; Anjali B Saxena; Benjamin A Goldstein; Wolfgang C Winkelmayer
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2012-10-02       Impact factor: 1.756

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Podocytopathies.

Authors:  Jeffrey B Kopp; Hans-Joachim Anders; Katalin Susztak; Manuel A Podestà; Giuseppe Remuzzi; Friedhelm Hildebrandt; Paola Romagnani
Journal:  Nat Rev Dis Primers       Date:  2020-08-13       Impact factor: 52.329

2.  Factors influencing the timing of initiation of renal replacement therapy and choice of modality in children with end-stage kidney disease.

Authors:  Kristen Favel; Janis M Dionne
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2019-10-25       Impact factor: 3.714

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.