Literature DB >> 19524962

The prognostic predictors of primary ureteral transitional cell carcinoma after radical nephroureterectomy.

Wei-Ming Li1, Ching-Chia Li, Hung-Lung Ke, Wen-Jeng Wu, Chun-Nung Huang, Chun-Hsiung Huang.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We studied the long-term prognosis, and evaluated the predictors of disease specific and recurrence-free survival in a large cohort of patients who had undergone radical nephroureterectomy for primary transitional cell carcinoma of the ureter.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: From January 1990 to December 2006, 145 patients with primary ureteral transitional cell carcinoma treated with nephroureterectomy and bladder cuff removal at our institution were included in the study. The medical records of these patients were reviewed retrospectively. The clinical and histopathological data were analyzed to evaluate the prognostic predictive factors. Univariate and multivariate statistical analyses were performed.
RESULTS: The 5-year disease specific survival rates of stage pTa/Tis/T1, pT2, pT3 and pT4 were 94.6%, 81.8%, 47.4% and 0%, respectively. The 5-year recurrence-free survival rates according to tumor grade were 68.4% for low grade and 35.7% for high grade disease. Of the 145 patients subsequent bladder tumors developed in 38 (26.2%), local recurrence developed in 11 (7.6%) and metachronous contralateral upper urinary tract tumor developed in 3 (2.1%). Most patients had subsequent tumor recurrence within the first year after radical surgery. On univariate and multivariate analyses tumor stage, tumor grade, severity of chronic renal disease, synchronous bladder tumor and hematuria were the significant prognostic variables predicting disease specific and recurrence-free survival.
CONCLUSIONS: Advanced tumor and chronic renal disease stages were significantly associated with a worse prognosis in patients with primary ureteral transitional cell carcinoma who had undergone radical nephroureterectomy. With regard to tumor recurrence, advanced tumor stage, high tumor grade and synchronous bladder tumor were independent risk factors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19524962     DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.04.026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  17 in total

1.  [Urothelial carcinoma of the upper urinary tract: clinical and pathological criteria and their predictive implications after radical nephroureterectomy].

Authors:  Christian Seitz; Paul Schramek
Journal:  Wien Med Wochenschr       Date:  2011-08

Review 2.  [Upper tract urothelial carcinoma. An update on clinical and pathological prognostic factors].

Authors:  M Rink; M Adam; J Hansen; F K Chun; S A Ahyai; M Remzi; T Schlomm; O Engel; R Heuer; C Eichelberg; M Fisch; R Dahlem; S F Shariat
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 0.639

3.  Canadian guidelines for postoperative surveillance of upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma.

Authors:  Anil Kapoor; Christopher B Allard; Peter Black; Wassim Kassouf; Christopher Morash; Ricardo Rendon
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2013 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.862

4.  Upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma: what have we learned in the last 4 years?

Authors:  Mesut Remzi; Shahrokh Shariat; Wilhelm Huebner; Harun Fajkovic; Christian Seitz
Journal:  Ther Adv Urol       Date:  2011-04

Review 5.  Prognostic factors for upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma.

Authors:  Thomas F Chromecki; Karim Bensalah; Mesut Remzi; Grégory Verhoest; Eugene K Cha; Douglas S Scherr; Giacomo Novara; Pierre I Karakiewicz; Shahrokh F Shariat
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2011-07-05       Impact factor: 14.432

6.  Specific body mass index cut-off value in relation to survival of patients with upper urinary tract urothelial carcinomas.

Authors:  Teruo Inamoto; Kazumasa Komura; Toshikazu Watsuji; Haruhito Azuma
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-07-08       Impact factor: 3.402

7.  Prognostic implication of infiltrative growth pattern and establishment of novel risk stratification model for survival in patients with upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma.

Authors:  Takeshi Hashimoto; Jun Nakashima; Rie Inoue; Tatsuo Gondo; Yoshio Ohno; Masaaki Tachibana
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-04-03       Impact factor: 3.402

8.  High visfatin expression predicts poor prognosis of upper tract urothelial carcinoma patients.

Authors:  Hung-Lung Ke; Hui-Hui Lin; Wei-Ming Li; Ching-Chia Li; Lin-Li Chang; Yi-Chen Lee; Chun-Nung Huang; Wen-Jeng Wu
Journal:  Am J Cancer Res       Date:  2015-07-15       Impact factor: 6.166

9.  Risk stratification model, including preoperative serum C-reactive protein and estimated glomerular filtration rate levels, in patients with upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma undergoing radical nephroureterectomy.

Authors:  Shuichi Morizane; Tetsuya Yumioka; Noriya Yamaguchi; Toshihiko Masago; Masashi Honda; Takehiro Sejima; Atsushi Takenaka
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2015-06-24       Impact factor: 2.370

10.  Preoperative prognostic factors after radical nephroureterectomy in patients with upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma.

Authors:  Shuichi Morizane; Hideto Iwamoto; Toshihiko Masago; Akihisa Yao; Tadahiro Isoyama; Takehiro Sejima; Atsushi Takenaka
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2012-12-11       Impact factor: 2.370

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.