Literature DB >> 23543747

Translesion synthesis past acrolein-derived DNA adducts by human mitochondrial DNA polymerase γ.

Rajesh Kasiviswanathan1, Irina G Minko, R Stephen Lloyd, William C Copeland.   

Abstract

Acrolein, a mutagenic aldehyde, is produced endogenously by lipid peroxidation and exogenously by combustion of organic materials, including tobacco products. Acrolein reacts with DNA bases forming exocyclic DNA adducts, such as γ-hydroxy-1,N(2)-propano-2'-deoxyguanosine (γ-HOPdG) and γ-hydroxy-1,N(6)-propano-2'-deoxyadenosine (γ-HOPdA). The bulky γ-HOPdG adduct blocks DNA synthesis by replicative polymerases but can be bypassed by translesion synthesis polymerases in the nucleus. Although acrolein-induced adducts are likely to be formed and persist in mitochondrial DNA, animal cell mitochondria lack specialized translesion DNA synthesis polymerases to tolerate these lesions. Thus, it is important to understand how pol γ, the sole mitochondrial DNA polymerase in human cells, acts on acrolein-adducted DNA. To address this question, we investigated the ability of pol γ to bypass the minor groove γ-HOPdG and major groove γ-HOPdA adducts using single nucleotide incorporation and primer extension analyses. The efficiency of pol γ-catalyzed bypass of γ-HOPdG was low, and surprisingly, pol γ preferred to incorporate purine nucleotides opposite the adduct. Pol γ also exhibited ∼2-fold lower rates of excision of the misincorporated purine nucleotides opposite γ-HOPdG compared with the corresponding nucleotides opposite dG. Extension of primers from the termini opposite γ-HOPdG was accomplished only following error-prone purine nucleotide incorporation. However, pol γ preferentially incorporated dT opposite the γ-HOPdA adduct and efficiently extended primers from the correctly paired terminus, indicating that γ-HOPdA is probably nonmutagenic. In summary, our data suggest that acrolein-induced exocyclic DNA lesions can be bypassed by mitochondrial DNA polymerase but, in the case of the minor groove γ-HOPdG adduct, at the cost of unprecedented high mutation rates.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acrolein; DNA Damage; DNA Polymerase; DNA Replication; Mitochondrial DNA; Oxidative Stress; Translesion DNA Synthesis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23543747      PMCID: PMC3656281          DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M113.458802

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biol Chem        ISSN: 0021-9258            Impact factor:   5.157


  57 in total

1.  Efficient and error-free replication past a minor-groove DNA adduct by the sequential action of human DNA polymerases iota and kappa.

Authors:  M Todd Washington; Irina G Minko; Robert E Johnson; William T Wolfle; Thomas M Harris; R Stephen Lloyd; Satya Prakash; Louise Prakash
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 4.272

2.  Characterization of the native and recombinant catalytic subunit of human DNA polymerase gamma: identification of residues critical for exonuclease activity and dideoxynucleotide sensitivity.

Authors:  M J Longley; P A Ropp; S E Lim; W C Copeland
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1998-07-21       Impact factor: 3.162

3.  Detection of exocyclic 1,N2-propanodeoxyguanosine adducts as common DNA lesions in rodents and humans.

Authors:  R G Nath; F L Chung
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1994-08-02       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  The effect of DNA mismatches on the ATPase activity of MSH1, a protein in yeast mitochondria that recognizes DNA mismatches.

Authors:  N W Chi; R D Kolodner
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1994-11-25       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 5.  Endogenous formation and significance of 1,N2-propanodeoxyguanosine adducts.

Authors:  F L Chung; R G Nath; M Nagao; A Nishikawa; G D Zhou; K Randerath
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  1999-03-08       Impact factor: 2.433

6.  Purification and characterization of MSH1, a yeast mitochondrial protein that binds to DNA mismatches.

Authors:  N W Chi; R D Kolodner
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1994-11-25       Impact factor: 5.157

7.  Efficient and error-free replication past a minor-groove N2-guanine adduct by the sequential action of yeast Rev1 and DNA polymerase zeta.

Authors:  M Todd Washington; Irina G Minko; Robert E Johnson; Lajos Haracska; Thomas M Harris; R Stephen Lloyd; Satya Prakash; Louise Prakash
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 4.272

8.  Action of mitochondrial DNA polymerase gamma at sites of base loss or oxidative damage.

Authors:  K G Pinz; S Shibutani; D F Bogenhagen
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1995-04-21       Impact factor: 5.157

9.  Detection of 1, N2-propanodeoxyguanosine adducts as potential endogenous DNA lesions in rodent and human tissues.

Authors:  R G Nath; J E Ocando; F L Chung
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1996-02-01       Impact factor: 12.701

10.  Acrolein is a product of lipid peroxidation reaction. Formation of free acrolein and its conjugate with lysine residues in oxidized low density lipoproteins.

Authors:  K Uchida; M Kanematsu; Y Morimitsu; T Osawa; N Noguchi; E Niki
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1998-06-26       Impact factor: 5.157

View more
  13 in total

1.  Synergistic Effects of the in cis T251I and P587L Mitochondrial DNA Polymerase γ Disease Mutations.

Authors:  Karen L DeBalsi; Matthew J Longley; Kirsten E Hoff; William C Copeland
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2017-02-02       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 2.  Molecular mechanisms of acrolein toxicity: relevance to human disease.

Authors:  Akshata Moghe; Smita Ghare; Bryan Lamoreau; Mohammad Mohammad; Shirish Barve; Craig McClain; Swati Joshi-Barve
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 4.849

3.  Polymerase γ efficiently replicates through many natural template barriers but stalls at the HSP1 quadruplex.

Authors:  Eric D Sullivan; Matthew J Longley; William C Copeland
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2020-10-19       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 4.  Mitochondrial toxicity of tobacco smoke and air pollution.

Authors:  Jessica L Fetterman; Melissa J Sammy; Scott W Ballinger
Journal:  Toxicology       Date:  2017-08-22       Impact factor: 4.221

Review 5.  Metabolic reprogramming and dysregulated metabolism: cause, consequence and/or enabler of environmental carcinogenesis?

Authors:  R Brooks Robey; Judith Weisz; Nancy B Kuemmerle; Anna C Salzberg; Arthur Berg; Dustin G Brown; Laura Kubik; Roberta Palorini; Fahd Al-Mulla; Rabeah Al-Temaimi; Annamaria Colacci; Chiara Mondello; Jayadev Raju; Jordan Woodrick; A Ivana Scovassi; Neetu Singh; Monica Vaccari; Rabindra Roy; Stefano Forte; Lorenzo Memeo; Hosni K Salem; Amedeo Amedei; Roslida A Hamid; Graeme P Williams; Leroy Lowe; Joel Meyer; Francis L Martin; William H Bisson; Ferdinando Chiaradonna; Elizabeth P Ryan
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 4.944

6.  Mitochondrial DNA exhibits resistance to induced point and deletion mutations.

Authors:  William J Valente; Nolan G Ericson; Alexandra S Long; Paul A White; Francesco Marchetti; Jason H Bielas
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2016-08-22       Impact factor: 16.971

7.  Deficiencies in mitochondrial dynamics sensitize Caenorhabditis elegans to arsenite and other mitochondrial toxicants by reducing mitochondrial adaptability.

Authors:  Anthony L Luz; Tewodros R Godebo; Latasha L Smith; Tess C Leuthner; Laura L Maurer; Joel N Meyer
Journal:  Toxicology       Date:  2017-06-08       Impact factor: 4.221

Review 8.  DNA damage related crosstalk between the nucleus and mitochondria.

Authors:  Mohammad Saki; Aishwarya Prakash
Journal:  Free Radic Biol Med       Date:  2016-11-30       Impact factor: 7.376

9.  Analysis of Translesion DNA Synthesis by the Mitochondrial DNA Polymerase γ.

Authors:  William C Copeland; Rajesh Kasiviswanathan; Matthew J Longley
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2016

Review 10.  Mitochondrial DNA damage induced autophagy, cell death, and disease.

Authors:  Bennett Van Houten; Senyene E Hunter; Joel N Meyer
Journal:  Front Biosci (Landmark Ed)       Date:  2016-01-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.